PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ACFIX vs. TTRZX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ACFIX vs. TTRZX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Water Island Credit Opportunities Fund (ACFIX) and Templeton Global Total Return Fund (TTRZX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ACFIX achieves a 2.14% return, which is significantly lower than TTRZX's 2.36% return. Over the past 10 years, ACFIX has outperformed TTRZX with an annualized return of 3.76%, while TTRZX has yielded a comparatively lower 1.13% annualized return.


ACFIX

1D
-0.10%
1M
0.62%
YTD
2.14%
6M
2.30%
1Y
4.69%
3Y*
5.48%
5Y*
3.50%
10Y*
3.76%

TTRZX

1D
0.14%
1M
0.31%
YTD
2.36%
6M
3.23%
1Y
10.02%
3Y*
6.57%
5Y*
0.03%
10Y*
1.13%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ACFIX vs. TTRZX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ACFIX
Water Island Credit Opportunities Fund
2.14%4.79%5.51%6.54%-2.70%3.24%6.71%5.68%1.85%1.45%
TTRZX
Templeton Global Total Return Fund
2.36%18.26%-6.61%6.28%-12.29%-5.14%-5.58%2.01%2.03%3.09%

Correlation

The correlation between ACFIX and TTRZX is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.27

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.19

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.29

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.19

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 10, 2012

0.21

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ACFIX vs. TTRZX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ACFIX
ACFIX Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
ACFIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ACFIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
ACFIX Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
ACFIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
ACFIX Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank

TTRZX
TTRZX Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
TTRZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TTRZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
TTRZX Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
TTRZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
TTRZX Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ACFIX vs. TTRZX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Water Island Credit Opportunities Fund (ACFIX) and Templeton Global Total Return Fund (TTRZX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ACFIXTTRZXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.21

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.48

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.25

+0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.23

1.43

-1.20

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.28

5.06

-4.78

ACFIX vs. TTRZX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ACFIX Sharpe Ratio is 0.14, which is lower than the TTRZX Sharpe Ratio of 1.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ACFIX and TTRZX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ACFIXTTRZXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.14

1.35

-1.21

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.23

0.00

+0.23

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.35

0.14

+0.20

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.36

0.48

-0.12

Drawdowns

ACFIX vs. TTRZX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ACFIX drawdown since its inception was -20.82%, smaller than the maximum TTRZX drawdown of -33.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACFIX and TTRZX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ACFIXTTRZXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.82%

-33.17%

+12.35%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-20.82%

-6.95%

-13.87%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.82%

-11.49%

-9.33%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.82%

-27.73%

+6.91%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-20.82%

-33.17%

+12.35%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-17.62%

-8.34%

-9.28%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.69%

-7.61%

+5.92%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

17.09%

1.95%

+15.14%

Volatility

ACFIX vs. TTRZX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Water Island Credit Opportunities Fund (ACFIX) is 0.45%, while Templeton Global Total Return Fund (TTRZX) has a volatility of 2.24%. This indicates that ACFIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TTRZX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ACFIXTTRZXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.45%

2.24%

-1.79%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.03%

6.11%

-5.08%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

33.49%

7.39%

+26.10%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.13%

9.22%

+5.91%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.89%

7.92%

+2.97%

ACFIX vs. TTRZX - Expense Ratio Comparison

ACFIX has a 0.98% expense ratio, which is higher than TTRZX's 0.89% expense ratio.


Dividends

ACFIX vs. TTRZX - Dividend Comparison

ACFIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.85%, less than TTRZX's 6.91% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ACFIX
Water Island Credit Opportunities Fund
3.85%4.17%4.71%4.00%3.55%2.59%2.95%3.52%2.92%3.01%2.38%2.91%
TTRZX
Templeton Global Total Return Fund
6.91%5.57%8.19%5.95%7.54%8.18%4.84%6.96%5.55%3.54%2.94%4.31%

Frequently Asked Questions


ACFIX and TTRZX have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TTRZX has higher volatility (2.24%) compared to ACFIX (0.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ACFIX dropped -20.82% vs TTRZX's -33.17%.

TTRZX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.35 vs 0.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ACFIX and TTRZX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer