ACFFX vs. FAOSX
ACFFX (Columbia Acorn International Select Fund) and FAOSX (Fidelity Advisor Overseas Fund Class Z) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, ACFFX returned 0.90%/yr vs 3.89%/yr for FAOSX. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. ACFFX charges 0.98%/yr vs 1.02%/yr for FAOSX.
Performance
ACFFX vs. FAOSX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
ACFFX
- 1D
- 1.33%
- 1M
- 5.20%
- YTD
- 6.50%
- 6M
- 7.05%
- 1Y
- 17.82%
- 3Y*
- 9.13%
- 5Y*
- 0.90%
- 10Y*
- 7.57%
FAOSX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- 0.00%
- 6M
- 0.00%
- 1Y
- 0.31%
- 3Y*
- 8.01%
- 5Y*
- 3.89%
- 10Y*
- —
ACFFX vs. FAOSX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ACFFX Columbia Acorn International Select Fund | 6.50% | 21.35% | -0.03% | 18.42% | -36.66% | 10.79% | 18.84% | 33.68% | -12.30% | 28.85% |
FAOSX Fidelity Advisor Overseas Fund Class Z | 0.00% | 15.36% | 5.06% | 20.52% | -24.31% | 19.42% | 15.17% | 27.96% | -14.73% | 26.25% |
Correlation
The correlation between ACFFX and FAOSX is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 1, 2017 | 0.87 |
Over the past year, the correlation between ACFFX and FAOSX has dropped to 0.52 - well below their long-term average of 0.87, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ACFFX vs. FAOSX — Risk / Return Rank
ACFFX
FAOSX
ACFFX vs. FAOSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Acorn International Select Fund (ACFFX) and Fidelity Advisor Overseas Fund Class Z (FAOSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ACFFX | FAOSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.97 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.41 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.00 | +0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.16 | -0.06 | +1.22 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.89 | -0.09 | +3.98 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ACFFX vs. FAOSX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ACFFX drawdown since its inception was -64.23%, which is greater than FAOSX's maximum drawdown of -36.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACFFX and FAOSX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ACFFX | FAOSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -64.23% | -36.24% | -27.99% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.48% | -7.26% | -7.22% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.12% | -13.96% | -4.16% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -47.50% | -36.24% | -11.26% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -47.50% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.85% | -5.86% | -0.99% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.91% | -7.92% | -11.99% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.32% | 4.13% | +0.19% |
Volatility
ACFFX vs. FAOSX - Volatility Comparison
Columbia Acorn International Select Fund (ACFFX) has a higher volatility of 5.68% compared to Fidelity Advisor Overseas Fund Class Z (FAOSX) at 0.00%. This indicates that ACFFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FAOSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ACFFX | FAOSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.68% | 0.00% | +5.68% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.33% | 3.63% | +11.70% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.28% | 8.76% | +9.52% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.21% | 16.70% | +3.51% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.22% | 16.64% | +2.58% |
ACFFX vs. FAOSX - Expense Ratio Comparison
ACFFX has a 0.98% expense ratio, which is lower than FAOSX's 1.02% expense ratio.
Dividends
ACFFX vs. FAOSX - Dividend Comparison
ACFFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.65%, less than FAOSX's 8.67% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ACFFX Columbia Acorn International Select Fund | 3.65% | 6.63% | 1.15% | 0.00% | 4.20% | 5.12% | 0.54% | 9.53% | 7.79% | 0.26% | 1.03% | 2.31% |
FAOSX Fidelity Advisor Overseas Fund Class Z | 8.67% | 8.67% | 1.80% | 1.12% | 0.85% | 2.07% | 0.00% | 1.70% | 5.30% | 3.93% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ACFFX and FAOSX have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ACFFX has higher volatility (5.68%) compared to FAOSX (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ACFFX dropped -64.23% vs FAOSX's -36.24%.
ACFFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.92 vs -0.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ACFFX and FAOSX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer