PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ACFFX vs. COSZX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ACFFX vs. COSZX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Columbia Acorn International Select Fund (ACFFX) and Columbia Overseas Value Fund (COSZX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ACFFX achieves a 6.50% return, which is significantly higher than COSZX's 6.13% return. Over the past 10 years, ACFFX has underperformed COSZX with an annualized return of 7.57%, while COSZX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.27% annualized return.


ACFFX

1D
1.33%
1M
5.20%
YTD
6.50%
6M
7.05%
1Y
17.82%
3Y*
9.13%
5Y*
0.90%
10Y*
7.57%

COSZX

1D
-0.07%
1M
-1.31%
YTD
6.13%
6M
6.05%
1Y
26.38%
3Y*
20.06%
5Y*
12.15%
10Y*
10.27%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ACFFX vs. COSZX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ACFFX
Columbia Acorn International Select Fund
6.50%21.35%-0.03%18.42%-36.66%10.79%18.84%33.68%-12.30%35.71%
COSZX
Columbia Overseas Value Fund
6.13%45.80%4.70%16.05%-5.99%10.78%-0.07%22.37%-16.70%27.82%

Correlation

The correlation between ACFFX and COSZX is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.81

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.81

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.78

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.78

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 1, 2008

0.82

The correlation between ACFFX and COSZX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ACFFX vs. COSZX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ACFFX
ACFFX Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
ACFFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ACFFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
ACFFX Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
ACFFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
ACFFX Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank

COSZX
COSZX Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
COSZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
COSZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
COSZX Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
COSZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
COSZX Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ACFFX vs. COSZX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Acorn International Select Fund (ACFFX) and Columbia Overseas Value Fund (COSZX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ACFFXCOSZXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.94

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.19

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.34

-0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.16

2.22

-1.06

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.89

7.29

-3.40

ACFFX vs. COSZX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ACFFX Sharpe Ratio is 0.92, which is lower than the COSZX Sharpe Ratio of 1.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ACFFX and COSZX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ACFFX vs. COSZX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ACFFX drawdown since its inception was -64.23%, roughly equal to the maximum COSZX drawdown of -63.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACFFX and COSZX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ACFFXCOSZXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-64.23%

-63.37%

-0.86%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.48%

-11.76%

-2.72%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.12%

-13.34%

-4.78%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-47.50%

-25.77%

-21.73%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-47.50%

-43.40%

-4.10%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.85%

-5.69%

-1.16%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.91%

-17.87%

-2.04%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.32%

3.58%

+0.74%

Volatility

ACFFX vs. COSZX - Volatility Comparison

Columbia Acorn International Select Fund (ACFFX) has a higher volatility of 5.68% compared to Columbia Overseas Value Fund (COSZX) at 4.16%. This indicates that ACFFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than COSZX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ACFFXCOSZXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.68%

4.16%

+1.52%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.33%

11.37%

+3.96%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.28%

14.02%

+4.26%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.21%

15.87%

+4.34%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.22%

17.43%

+1.79%

ACFFX vs. COSZX - Expense Ratio Comparison

ACFFX has a 0.98% expense ratio, which is higher than COSZX's 0.90% expense ratio.


Dividends

ACFFX vs. COSZX - Dividend Comparison

ACFFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.65%, less than COSZX's 7.46% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ACFFX
Columbia Acorn International Select Fund
3.65%6.63%1.15%0.00%4.20%5.12%0.54%9.53%7.79%0.26%1.03%2.31%
COSZX
Columbia Overseas Value Fund
7.46%7.91%5.38%3.97%1.88%3.59%1.69%3.82%3.59%1.71%1.99%2.27%

Frequently Asked Questions


ACFFX and COSZX have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ACFFX has higher volatility (5.68%) compared to COSZX (4.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ACFFX dropped -64.23% vs COSZX's -63.37%.

COSZX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.86 vs 0.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ACFFX and COSZX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer