ACFFX vs. COSZX
ACFFX (Columbia Acorn International Select Fund) and COSZX (Columbia Overseas Value Fund) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds from Columbia. Over the past 10 years, ACFFX returned 7.57%/yr vs 10.27%/yr for COSZX. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. ACFFX charges 0.98%/yr vs 0.90%/yr for COSZX.
Performance
ACFFX vs. COSZX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ACFFX achieves a 6.50% return, which is significantly higher than COSZX's 6.13% return. Over the past 10 years, ACFFX has underperformed COSZX with an annualized return of 7.57%, while COSZX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.27% annualized return.
ACFFX
- 1D
- 1.33%
- 1M
- 5.20%
- YTD
- 6.50%
- 6M
- 7.05%
- 1Y
- 17.82%
- 3Y*
- 9.13%
- 5Y*
- 0.90%
- 10Y*
- 7.57%
COSZX
- 1D
- -0.07%
- 1M
- -1.31%
- YTD
- 6.13%
- 6M
- 6.05%
- 1Y
- 26.38%
- 3Y*
- 20.06%
- 5Y*
- 12.15%
- 10Y*
- 10.27%
ACFFX vs. COSZX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ACFFX Columbia Acorn International Select Fund | 6.50% | 21.35% | -0.03% | 18.42% | -36.66% | 10.79% | 18.84% | 33.68% | -12.30% | 35.71% |
COSZX Columbia Overseas Value Fund | 6.13% | 45.80% | 4.70% | 16.05% | -5.99% | 10.78% | -0.07% | 22.37% | -16.70% | 27.82% |
Correlation
The correlation between ACFFX and COSZX is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 1, 2008 | 0.82 |
The correlation between ACFFX and COSZX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ACFFX vs. COSZX — Risk / Return Rank
ACFFX
COSZX
ACFFX vs. COSZX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Acorn International Select Fund (ACFFX) and Columbia Overseas Value Fund (COSZX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ACFFX | COSZX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.94 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.19 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.34 | -0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.16 | 2.22 | -1.06 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.89 | 7.29 | -3.40 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ACFFX vs. COSZX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ACFFX drawdown since its inception was -64.23%, roughly equal to the maximum COSZX drawdown of -63.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACFFX and COSZX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ACFFX | COSZX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -64.23% | -63.37% | -0.86% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.48% | -11.76% | -2.72% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.12% | -13.34% | -4.78% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -47.50% | -25.77% | -21.73% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -47.50% | -43.40% | -4.10% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.85% | -5.69% | -1.16% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.91% | -17.87% | -2.04% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.32% | 3.58% | +0.74% |
Volatility
ACFFX vs. COSZX - Volatility Comparison
Columbia Acorn International Select Fund (ACFFX) has a higher volatility of 5.68% compared to Columbia Overseas Value Fund (COSZX) at 4.16%. This indicates that ACFFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than COSZX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ACFFX | COSZX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.68% | 4.16% | +1.52% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.33% | 11.37% | +3.96% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.28% | 14.02% | +4.26% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.21% | 15.87% | +4.34% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.22% | 17.43% | +1.79% |
ACFFX vs. COSZX - Expense Ratio Comparison
ACFFX has a 0.98% expense ratio, which is higher than COSZX's 0.90% expense ratio.
Dividends
ACFFX vs. COSZX - Dividend Comparison
ACFFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.65%, less than COSZX's 7.46% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ACFFX Columbia Acorn International Select Fund | 3.65% | 6.63% | 1.15% | 0.00% | 4.20% | 5.12% | 0.54% | 9.53% | 7.79% | 0.26% | 1.03% | 2.31% |
COSZX Columbia Overseas Value Fund | 7.46% | 7.91% | 5.38% | 3.97% | 1.88% | 3.59% | 1.69% | 3.82% | 3.59% | 1.71% | 1.99% | 2.27% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ACFFX and COSZX have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ACFFX has higher volatility (5.68%) compared to COSZX (4.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ACFFX dropped -64.23% vs COSZX's -63.37%.
COSZX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.86 vs 0.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ACFFX and COSZX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer