PortfoliosLab logo
ACET vs. BEAM
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between ACET and BEAM is 0.31, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

ACET vs. BEAM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Adicet Bio, Inc. (ACET) and Beam Therapeutics Inc. (BEAM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

ACET:

-0.58

BEAM:

-0.47

Sortino Ratio

ACET:

-0.68

BEAM:

-0.30

Omega Ratio

ACET:

0.93

BEAM:

0.97

Calmar Ratio

ACET:

-0.54

BEAM:

-0.39

Martin Ratio

ACET:

-1.44

BEAM:

-1.24

Ulcer Index

ACET:

37.58%

BEAM:

27.94%

Daily Std Dev

ACET:

89.02%

BEAM:

73.63%

Max Drawdown

ACET:

-99.69%

BEAM:

-89.12%

Current Drawdown

ACET:

-99.51%

BEAM:

-88.15%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

ACET:

$59.55M

BEAM:

$1.64B

EPS

ACET:

-$1.42

BEAM:

-$4.61

PS Ratio

ACET:

9.72

BEAM:

25.81

PB Ratio

ACET:

0.37

BEAM:

1.46

Total Revenue (TTM)

ACET:

$0.00

BEAM:

$63.58M

Gross Profit (TTM)

ACET:

-$1.60M

BEAM:

$47.08M

EBITDA (TTM)

ACET:

-$114.17M

BEAM:

-$399.03M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ACET achieves a -25.33% return, which is significantly higher than BEAM's -36.17% return.


ACET

YTD

-25.33%

1M

8.49%

6M

-36.43%

1Y

-51.47%

3Y*

-60.68%

5Y*

-45.68%

10Y*

N/A

BEAM

YTD

-36.17%

1M

-20.57%

6M

-42.16%

1Y

-34.29%

3Y*

-23.37%

5Y*

-9.13%

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Adicet Bio, Inc.

Beam Therapeutics Inc.

Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

ACET vs. BEAM — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ACET
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of ACET is 1616
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of ACET is 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of ACET is 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of ACET is 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of ACET is 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of ACET is 77
Martin Ratio Rank

BEAM
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of BEAM is 2424
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of BEAM is 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of BEAM is 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of BEAM is 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of BEAM is 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of BEAM is 1515
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

ACET vs. BEAM - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Adicet Bio, Inc. (ACET) and Beam Therapeutics Inc. (BEAM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current ACET Sharpe Ratio is -0.58, which is comparable to the BEAM Sharpe Ratio of -0.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ACET and BEAM, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

ACET vs. BEAM - Dividend Comparison

Neither ACET nor BEAM has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

ACET vs. BEAM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ACET drawdown since its inception was -99.69%, which is greater than BEAM's maximum drawdown of -89.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACET and BEAM.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

ACET vs. BEAM - Volatility Comparison

Adicet Bio, Inc. (ACET) has a higher volatility of 48.78% compared to Beam Therapeutics Inc. (BEAM) at 24.72%. This indicates that ACET's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BEAM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

ACET vs. BEAM - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Adicet Bio, Inc. and Beam Therapeutics Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00100.00M200.00M300.00M202120222023202420250
7.47M
(ACET) Total Revenue
(BEAM) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items