ACES vs. WNTR

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

ACES (ALPS Clean Energy ETF) and WNTR (YieldMax Short MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ACES is a Alternative Energy Equities fund tracking the CIBC Atlas Clean Energy Index, while WNTR is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by YieldMax. ACES is passively managed, while WNTR is actively managed. Over the past year, ACES returned 38.20% vs 97.02% for WNTR. At a correlation of -0.45, they often move in opposite directions. ACES charges 0.55%/yr vs 1.01%/yr for WNTR.

Performance

ACES vs. WNTR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ALPS Clean Energy ETF (ACES) and YieldMax Short MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF (WNTR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ACES achieves a 8.08% return, which is significantly lower than WNTR's 10.46% return.

ACES

• 1D: -1.10%
• 1M: -10.50%
• YTD: 8.08%
• 6M: 3.03%
• 1Y: 38.20%
• 3Y*: -5.46%
• 5Y*: -13.18%
• 10Y*: —

WNTR

• 1D: 6.01%
• 1M: 37.47%
• YTD: 10.46%
• 6M: 14.06%
• 1Y: 97.02%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ACES vs. WNTR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
ACES ALPS Clean Energy ETF	8.08%	38.82%
WNTR YieldMax Short MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF	10.46%	52.78%

Correlation

The correlation between ACES and WNTR is -0.43, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.43
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 27, 2025	-0.45

Return for Risk

ACES vs. WNTR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ACES

ACES Risk / Return Rank: 36
ACES Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
ACES Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
ACES Omega Ratio Rank: 32
ACES Calmar Ratio Rank: 46
ACES Martin Ratio Rank: 36

WNTR

WNTR Risk / Return Rank: 51
WNTR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 63
WNTR Sortino Ratio Rank: 49
WNTR Omega Ratio Rank: 52
WNTR Calmar Ratio Rank: 51
WNTR Martin Ratio Rank: 40

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ACES vs. WNTR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ALPS Clean Energy ETF (ACES) and YieldMax Short MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF (WNTR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ACES	WNTR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.13	1.85	-0.72
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.64	2.20	-0.56
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.20	1.30	-0.10
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.08	2.29	-0.20
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.00	5.85	-0.85

ACES vs. WNTR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ACES Sharpe Ratio is 1.13, which is lower than the WNTR Sharpe Ratio of 1.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ACES and WNTR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

ACES vs. WNTR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ACES drawdown since its inception was -79.05%, which is greater than WNTR's maximum drawdown of -42.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACES and WNTR.

Drawdown Indicators

	ACES	WNTR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-79.05%	-42.65%	-36.40%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-18.42%	-42.65%	+24.23%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-58.68%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-74.44%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-63.40%	-9.88%	-53.52%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-39.01%	-20.93%	-18.08%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	7.67%	16.70%	-9.03%

Volatility

ACES vs. WNTR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ALPS Clean Energy ETF (ACES) is 13.82%, while YieldMax Short MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF (WNTR) has a volatility of 17.54%. This indicates that ACES experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WNTR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ACES	WNTR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	13.82%	17.54%	-3.72%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	25.18%	45.99%	-20.81%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	33.96%	52.83%	-18.87%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	36.53%	53.10%	-16.57%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	35.72%	53.10%	-17.38%

ACES vs. WNTR - Expense Ratio Comparison

ACES has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is lower than WNTR's 1.01% expense ratio.

Dividends

ACES vs. WNTR - Dividend Comparison

ACES's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.63%, less than WNTR's 96.66% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
ACES ALPS Clean Energy ETF	0.63%	0.70%	1.10%	1.44%	1.08%	0.71%	0.56%	1.79%	0.34%
WNTR YieldMax Short MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF	96.66%	58.56%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ACES and WNTR in my portfolio?

ACES and WNTR have a correlation of -0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ACES or WNTR?

WNTR has higher volatility (17.54%) compared to ACES (13.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ACES dropped -79.05% vs WNTR's -42.65%.

Which ETF is better, ACES or WNTR?

On 1-year performance, WNTR leads with 97.02% vs 38.20% for ACES. On fees, ACES is cheaper at 0.55% per year. On volatility, ACES has been the lower-risk option at 13.82%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, ACES or WNTR?

Over the 1-year period, WNTR has performed better with a 97.02% return vs 38.20%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, ACES or WNTR?

ACES is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 1.01% for WNTR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ACES or WNTR?

WNTR has the higher dividend yield at 96.66%, compared with 0.63% for ACES.

What is the main difference between ACES and WNTR?

ACES is categorized as Alternative Energy Equities, while WNTR is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: SS&C and YieldMax. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for ACES and 1.01% for WNTR.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

WNTR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.85 vs 1.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.