ACES vs. EVX
ACES (ALPS Clean Energy ETF) and EVX (VanEck Vectors Environmental Services ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ACES is a Alternative Energy Equities fund tracking the CIBC Atlas Clean Energy Index, while EVX is a Industrials Equities fund tracking the NYSE Arca Environmental Services Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, ACES returned -8.07%/yr vs 6.96%/yr for EVX. A 0.58 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.55% expense ratio.
Performance
ACES vs. EVX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ACES achieves a 32.49% return, which is significantly higher than EVX's 1.43% return.
ACES
- 1D
- 2.95%
- 1M
- 20.25%
- YTD
- 32.49%
- 6M
- 32.78%
- 1Y
- 80.47%
- 3Y*
- -0.25%
- 5Y*
- -8.07%
- 10Y*
- —
EVX
- 1D
- 0.05%
- 1M
- -3.39%
- YTD
- 1.43%
- 6M
- 1.62%
- 1Y
- 4.18%
- 3Y*
- 9.85%
- 5Y*
- 6.96%
- 10Y*
- 11.86%
ACES vs. EVX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ACES ALPS Clean Energy ETF | 32.49% | 25.44% | -26.71% | -20.04% | -28.44% | -19.44% | 140.33% | 51.70% | -9.63% |
EVX VanEck Vectors Environmental Services ETF | 1.43% | 11.72% | 12.99% | 12.97% | -10.58% | 27.47% | 13.28% | 28.41% | -7.24% |
Correlation
The correlation between ACES and EVX is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 2, 2018 | 0.58 |
The correlation between ACES and EVX shifts across timeframes, from 0.40 (1 year) to 0.58 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
ACES vs. EVX - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ACES
EVX
Utilities
Technology
-
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
-
Basic Materials
Financial Services
-
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Communication Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
ACES
EVX
Technology
ACES
EVX
-
Industrials
ACES
EVX
Consumer Cyclical
ACES
EVX
-
Basic Materials
ACES
EVX
Financial Services
ACES
EVX
-
Consumer Defensive
ACES
EVX
Energy
ACES
EVX
Communication Services
ACES
-
EVX
-
Healthcare
ACES
-
EVX
-
Real Estate
ACES
-
EVX
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ACES vs. EVX — Risk / Return Rank
ACES
EVX
ACES vs. EVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ALPS Clean Energy ETF (ACES) and VanEck Vectors Environmental Services ETF (EVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ACES | EVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.51 | 0.31 | +2.20 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.09 | 0.52 | +2.57 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.06 | +0.31 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.47 | 0.33 | +4.14 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.30 | 0.80 | +10.50 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ACES | EVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.51 | 0.31 | +2.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.22 | 0.40 | -0.62 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.59 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.23 | 0.43 | -0.20 |
Drawdowns
ACES vs. EVX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ACES drawdown since its inception was -79.05%, which is greater than EVX's maximum drawdown of -55.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACES and EVX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ACES | EVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -79.05% | -55.91% | -23.14% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.44% | -10.85% | -6.59% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -58.68% | -19.33% | -39.35% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -74.44% | -21.45% | -52.99% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -41.01% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -55.14% | -8.37% | -46.77% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -38.86% | -8.76% | -30.10% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.91% | 4.54% | +2.37% |
Volatility
ACES vs. EVX - Volatility Comparison
ALPS Clean Energy ETF (ACES) has a higher volatility of 9.41% compared to VanEck Vectors Environmental Services ETF (EVX) at 3.32%. This indicates that ACES's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ACES | EVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.41% | 3.32% | +6.09% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.55% | 9.83% | +12.72% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 32.32% | 13.51% | +18.81% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 36.15% | 17.59% | +18.56% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 35.58% | 20.25% | +15.33% |
ACES vs. EVX - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both ACES and EVX have an expense ratio of 0.55%.
Dividends
ACES vs. EVX - Dividend Comparison
ACES's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.53%, more than EVX's 0.18% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ACES ALPS Clean Energy ETF | 0.53% | 0.70% | 1.10% | 1.44% | 1.08% | 0.71% | 0.56% | 1.79% | 0.34% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
EVX VanEck Vectors Environmental Services ETF | 0.18% | 0.19% | 0.46% | 0.95% | 0.41% | 0.24% | 0.32% | 0.38% | 0.38% | 0.89% | 0.70% | 1.16% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ACES and EVX have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ACES has higher volatility (9.41%) compared to EVX (3.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ACES dropped -79.05% vs EVX's -55.91%.
On 5-year performance, EVX leads with 6.96% vs -8.07% for ACES. Both ETFs have the same 0.55% expense ratio. On volatility, EVX has been the lower-risk option at 3.32%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, EVX has performed better with a 6.96% return vs -8.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ACES and EVX have the same expense ratio: 0.55% per year.
ACES has the higher dividend yield at 0.53%, compared with 0.18% for EVX.
ACES is categorized as Alternative Energy Equities, while EVX is Industrials Equities. ACES tracks CIBC Atlas Clean Energy Index, while EVX tracks NYSE Arca Environmental Services Index. They also come from different issuers: SS&C and VanEck.
ACES currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.51 vs 0.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ACES and EVX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer