ACCNX vs. TIBDX

Last updated Jun 6, 2026

ACCNX (American Century Core Plus Fund) and TIBDX (TIAA-CREF Core Bond Fund) are both Intermediate Core-Plus Bond funds. Over the past 10 years, ACCNX returned 1.74%/yr vs 1.99%/yr for TIBDX. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. ACCNX charges 0.54%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for TIBDX.

Performance

ACCNX vs. TIBDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Century Core Plus Fund (ACCNX) and TIAA-CREF Core Bond Fund (TIBDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with ACCNX having a 0.54% return and TIBDX slightly higher at 0.56%. Over the past 10 years, ACCNX has underperformed TIBDX with an annualized return of 1.74%, while TIBDX has yielded a comparatively higher 1.99% annualized return.

ACCNX

• 1D: 0.22%
• 1M: -0.04%
• YTD: 0.54%
• 6M: 0.94%
• 1Y: 5.70%
• 3Y*: 4.45%
• 5Y*: -0.14%
• 10Y*: 1.74%

TIBDX

• 1D: 0.11%
• 1M: -0.17%
• YTD: 0.56%
• 6M: 0.93%
• 1Y: 5.56%
• 3Y*: 4.29%
• 5Y*: 0.18%
• 10Y*: 1.99%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ACCNX vs. TIBDX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
ACCNX American Century Core Plus Fund	0.54%	7.45%	2.00%	5.64%	-15.80%	0.34%	8.00%	9.05%	-1.37%	4.59%
TIBDX TIAA-CREF Core Bond Fund	0.56%	7.38%	1.95%	5.63%	-13.68%	-0.95%	8.10%	9.57%	-0.64%	4.48%

Correlation

The correlation between ACCNX and TIBDX is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.94
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.96
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.97
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.95
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 4, 2006	0.93

The correlation between ACCNX and TIBDX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

ACCNX vs. TIBDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ACCNX

ACCNX Risk / Return Rank: 26
ACCNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 26
ACCNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 27
ACCNX Omega Ratio Rank: 25
ACCNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 25
ACCNX Martin Ratio Rank: 25

TIBDX

TIBDX Risk / Return Rank: 26
TIBDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 26
TIBDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 27
TIBDX Omega Ratio Rank: 26
TIBDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 26
TIBDX Martin Ratio Rank: 24

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ACCNX vs. TIBDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Century Core Plus Fund (ACCNX) and TIAA-CREF Core Bond Fund (TIBDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ACCNX	TIBDX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.39	1.39	0.00
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.06	2.07	0.00
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.25	1.25	0.00
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.78	1.80	-0.03
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.71	5.59	+0.13
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ACCNX vs. TIBDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ACCNX Sharpe Ratio is 1.39, which is comparable to the TIBDX Sharpe Ratio of 1.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ACCNX and TIBDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ACCNX	TIBDX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.39	1.39	0.00
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.02	0.03	-0.05
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.35	0.42	-0.08
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.74	0.95	-0.21

Drawdowns

ACCNX vs. TIBDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ACCNX drawdown since its inception was -20.34%, which is greater than TIBDX's maximum drawdown of -18.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACCNX and TIBDX.

Drawdown Indicators

	ACCNX	TIBDX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-20.34%	-18.82%	-1.52%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.09%	-2.98%	-0.11%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-6.99%	-6.29%	-0.70%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-20.34%	-18.82%	-1.52%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-20.34%	-18.82%	-1.52%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.75%	-1.32%	-1.43%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.18%	-2.30%	-0.88%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.96%	0.96%	0.00%

Volatility

ACCNX vs. TIBDX - Volatility Comparison

American Century Core Plus Fund (ACCNX) has a higher volatility of 1.45% compared to TIAA-CREF Core Bond Fund (TIBDX) at 1.32%. This indicates that ACCNX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TIBDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ACCNX	TIBDX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.45%	1.32%	+0.13%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.93%	2.85%	+0.08%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.98%	3.90%	+0.08%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	6.15%	5.63%	+0.52%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	5.03%	4.73%	+0.30%

ACCNX vs. TIBDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

ACCNX has a 0.54% expense ratio, which is higher than TIBDX's 0.29% expense ratio.

Dividends

ACCNX vs. TIBDX - Dividend Comparison

ACCNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.70%, more than TIBDX's 4.45% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ACCNX American Century Core Plus Fund	4.70%	4.74%	4.84%	4.21%	2.29%	3.18%	2.03%	2.75%	3.88%	2.99%	2.79%	2.93%
TIBDX TIAA-CREF Core Bond Fund	4.45%	4.34%	3.60%	3.22%	2.44%	2.39%	4.45%	3.09%	2.88%	2.93%	3.80%	4.68%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ACCNX and TIBDX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.94, ACCNX and TIBDX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, ACCNX or TIBDX?

ACCNX has higher volatility (1.45%) compared to TIBDX (1.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ACCNX dropped -20.34% vs TIBDX's -18.82%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

TIBDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.39 vs 1.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.