ACAYX vs. JLGMX

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

ACAYX (Alger Capital Appreciation Institutional Fund Class Y) and JLGMX (JPMorgan Large Cap Growth Fund Class R6) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, ACAYX returned 21.95%/yr vs 13.99%/yr for JLGMX. With a 0.96 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. ACAYX charges 0.83%/yr vs 0.44%/yr for JLGMX.

Performance

ACAYX vs. JLGMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Alger Capital Appreciation Institutional Fund Class Y (ACAYX) and JPMorgan Large Cap Growth Fund Class R6 (JLGMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ACAYX achieves a 17.49% return, which is significantly higher than JLGMX's 7.96% return.

ACAYX

• 1D: 1.34%
• 1M: 11.11%
• YTD: 17.49%
• 6M: 16.72%
• 1Y: 47.85%
• 3Y*: 44.96%
• 5Y*: 21.95%
• 10Y*: —

JLGMX

• 1D: 0.66%
• 1M: 6.71%
• YTD: 7.96%
• 6M: 6.63%
• 1Y: 21.82%
• 3Y*: 24.07%
• 5Y*: 13.99%
• 10Y*: 20.16%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ACAYX vs. JLGMX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
ACAYX Alger Capital Appreciation Institutional Fund Class Y	17.49%	32.26%	70.32%	43.39%	-36.58%	18.80%	42.01%	33.67%	-0.38%	18.92%
JLGMX JPMorgan Large Cap Growth Fund Class R6	7.96%	14.38%	35.40%	34.95%	-25.20%	18.48%	56.39%	39.47%	0.74%	24.97%

Correlation

The correlation between ACAYX and JLGMX is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.91
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.95
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.96
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 2, 2017	0.96

The correlation between ACAYX and JLGMX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

ACAYX vs. JLGMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ACAYX

ACAYX Risk / Return Rank: 50
ACAYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 64
ACAYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 50
ACAYX Omega Ratio Rank: 48
ACAYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 48
ACAYX Martin Ratio Rank: 41

JLGMX

JLGMX Risk / Return Rank: 20
JLGMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 25
JLGMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
JLGMX Omega Ratio Rank: 24
JLGMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 14
JLGMX Martin Ratio Rank: 13

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ACAYX vs. JLGMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alger Capital Appreciation Institutional Fund Class Y (ACAYX) and JPMorgan Large Cap Growth Fund Class R6 (JLGMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ACAYX	JLGMX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.35	1.44	+0.91
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.97	1.98	+0.99
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.38	1.26	+0.12
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.66	1.34	+1.32
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	8.86	3.82	+5.04
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ACAYX vs. JLGMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ACAYX Sharpe Ratio is 2.35, which is higher than the JLGMX Sharpe Ratio of 1.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ACAYX and JLGMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ACAYX	JLGMX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.35	1.44	+0.91
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.78	0.70	+0.08
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.94	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.87	0.85	+0.02

Drawdowns

ACAYX vs. JLGMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ACAYX drawdown since its inception was -46.37%, which is greater than JLGMX's maximum drawdown of -31.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACAYX and JLGMX.

Drawdown Indicators

	ACAYX	JLGMX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-46.37%	-31.82%	-14.55%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-18.50%	-16.73%	-1.77%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-27.75%	-21.47%	-6.28%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-46.37%	-31.13%	-15.24%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-31.82%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.74%	-5.81%	-4.93%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.56%	5.85%	-0.29%

Volatility

ACAYX vs. JLGMX - Volatility Comparison

Alger Capital Appreciation Institutional Fund Class Y (ACAYX) has a higher volatility of 5.07% compared to JPMorgan Large Cap Growth Fund Class R6 (JLGMX) at 3.87%. This indicates that ACAYX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JLGMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ACAYX	JLGMX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.07%	3.87%	+1.20%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	16.00%	11.22%	+4.78%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	21.24%	15.60%	+5.64%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	28.25%	20.18%	+8.07%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	25.82%	21.57%	+4.25%

ACAYX vs. JLGMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

ACAYX has a 0.83% expense ratio, which is higher than JLGMX's 0.44% expense ratio.

Dividends

ACAYX vs. JLGMX - Dividend Comparison

ACAYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.65%, less than JLGMX's 10.23% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ACAYX Alger Capital Appreciation Institutional Fund Class Y	5.65%	6.64%	24.81%	7.76%	3.77%	18.85%	16.28%	10.19%	12.28%	6.73%	0.00%	0.00%
JLGMX JPMorgan Large Cap Growth Fund Class R6	10.23%	11.04%	2.12%	0.31%	3.49%	14.25%	5.14%	12.65%	15.59%	14.44%	9.71%	4.43%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ACAYX and JLGMX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.91, ACAYX and JLGMX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, ACAYX or JLGMX?

ACAYX has higher volatility (5.07%) compared to JLGMX (3.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ACAYX dropped -46.37% vs JLGMX's -31.82%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ACAYX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.35 vs 1.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.