PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ABX.TO vs. SIS.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

ABX.TO vs. SIS.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Barrick Gold Corporation (ABX.TO) and Savaria Corporation (SIS.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ABX.TO achieves a -7.65% return, which is significantly lower than SIS.TO's 32.01% return. Over the past 10 years, ABX.TO has underperformed SIS.TO with an annualized return of 10.36%, while SIS.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 17.49% annualized return.


ABX.TO

1D
-0.96%
1M
-7.27%
YTD
-7.65%
6M
-2.56%
1Y
100.69%
3Y*
37.09%
5Y*
17.25%
10Y*
10.36%

SIS.TO

1D
2.40%
1M
5.43%
YTD
32.01%
6M
39.38%
1Y
59.39%
3Y*
24.84%
5Y*
11.53%
10Y*
17.49%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ABX.TO vs. SIS.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ABX.TO
Barrick Gold Corporation
-7.65%173.89%-4.69%5.66%1.28%-13.98%21.72%31.81%2.67%-14.89%
SIS.TO
Savaria Corporation
32.01%17.77%34.86%12.15%-24.44%35.92%7.37%10.42%-26.61%71.44%

Correlation

The correlation between ABX.TO and SIS.TO is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.23

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.18

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.10

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.04

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 7, 2006

0.01

Over the past year, ABX.TO and SIS.TO have become more correlated (0.23) than their long-term average of 0.01, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

ABX.TO:

CA$91.34B

SIS.TO:

CA$2.17B

EPS

ABX.TO:

CA$3.60

SIS.TO:

CA$1.10

PE Ratio

ABX.TO:

15.16

SIS.TO:

27.19

PEG Ratio

ABX.TO:

0.17

SIS.TO:

0.43

PS Ratio

ABX.TO:

4.86

SIS.TO:

2.31

PB Ratio

ABX.TO:

3.34

SIS.TO:

3.29

Total Revenue (TTM)

ABX.TO:

CA$19.02B

SIS.TO:

CA$928.84M

Gross Profit (TTM)

ABX.TO:

CA$10.15B

SIS.TO:

CA$362.29M

EBITDA (TTM)

ABX.TO:

CA$12.44B

SIS.TO:

CA$176.47M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ABX.TO vs. SIS.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ABX.TO
ABX.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
ABX.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ABX.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
ABX.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
ABX.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
ABX.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank

SIS.TO
SIS.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
SIS.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SIS.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
SIS.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
SIS.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
SIS.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ABX.TO vs. SIS.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Barrick Gold Corporation (ABX.TO) and Savaria Corporation (SIS.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ABX.TOSIS.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.24

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.17

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.44

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.55

6.14

-2.58

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.00

17.99

-9.00

ABX.TO vs. SIS.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ABX.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.28, which is comparable to the SIS.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ABX.TO and SIS.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ABX.TOSIS.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.28

2.53

-0.24

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

0.43

+0.07

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.29

0.54

-0.25

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.10

0.39

-0.29

Drawdowns

ABX.TO vs. SIS.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ABX.TO drawdown since its inception was -84.65%, which is greater than SIS.TO's maximum drawdown of -75.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ABX.TO and SIS.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ABX.TOSIS.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-84.65%

-75.48%

-9.17%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-28.49%

-9.72%

-18.77%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.49%

-33.99%

+5.50%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-43.11%

-44.22%

+1.11%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-56.74%

-62.16%

+5.42%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-23.16%

-1.33%

-21.83%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-40.47%

-20.77%

-19.70%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.23%

3.31%

+7.92%

Volatility

ABX.TO vs. SIS.TO - Volatility Comparison

Barrick Gold Corporation (ABX.TO) has a higher volatility of 16.64% compared to Savaria Corporation (SIS.TO) at 6.86%. This indicates that ABX.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SIS.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ABX.TOSIS.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

16.64%

6.86%

+9.78%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

34.09%

19.36%

+14.73%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

44.43%

23.68%

+20.75%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

34.52%

26.92%

+7.60%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

35.90%

32.32%

+3.58%

Dividends

ABX.TO vs. SIS.TO - Dividend Comparison

ABX.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.32%, more than SIS.TO's 1.86% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ABX.TO
Barrick Gold Corporation
2.32%1.22%2.46%2.27%4.77%3.96%1.33%0.60%1.17%0.72%0.47%1.43%
SIS.TO
Savaria Corporation
1.86%2.40%2.65%3.42%3.62%2.54%3.23%3.11%2.91%1.73%1.98%3.09%

Financials

ABX.TO vs. SIS.TO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Barrick Gold Corporation and Savaria Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.001.00B2.00B3.00B4.00B5.00B6.00B20222023202420252026
5.16B
235.55M
(ABX.TO) Total Revenue
(SIS.TO) Total Revenue
Values in CAD except per share items

ABX.TO vs. SIS.TO - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Barrick Gold Corporation and Savaria Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%20222023202420252026
57.5%
39.0%
Portfolio components
ABX.TO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Barrick Gold Corporation reported a gross profit of 2.97B and revenue of 5.16B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 57.5%.

SIS.TO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Savaria Corporation reported a gross profit of 91.74M and revenue of 235.55M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 39.0%.

ABX.TO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Barrick Gold Corporation reported an operating income of 2.93B and revenue of 5.16B, resulting in an operating margin of 56.7%.

SIS.TO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Savaria Corporation reported an operating income of 33.15M and revenue of 235.55M, resulting in an operating margin of 14.1%.

ABX.TO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Barrick Gold Corporation reported a net income of 1.58B and revenue of 5.16B, resulting in a net margin of 30.5%.

SIS.TO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Savaria Corporation reported a net income of 22.68M and revenue of 235.55M, resulting in a net margin of 9.6%.


Frequently Asked Questions


ABX.TO and SIS.TO have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ABX.TO and SIS.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer