PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ABX.TO vs. GRT-UN.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

ABX.TO vs. GRT-UN.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Barrick Gold Corporation (ABX.TO) and Granite Real Estate Investment Trust (GRT-UN.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ABX.TO achieves a -7.65% return, which is significantly lower than GRT-UN.TO's 19.72% return. Over the past 10 years, ABX.TO has underperformed GRT-UN.TO with an annualized return of 10.36%, while GRT-UN.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 14.48% annualized return.


ABX.TO

1D
-0.96%
1M
-7.27%
YTD
-7.65%
6M
-2.56%
1Y
100.69%
3Y*
37.09%
5Y*
17.25%
10Y*
10.36%

GRT-UN.TO

1D
0.22%
1M
3.25%
YTD
19.72%
6M
28.31%
1Y
41.14%
3Y*
9.94%
5Y*
7.55%
10Y*
14.48%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ABX.TO vs. GRT-UN.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ABX.TO
Barrick Gold Corporation
-7.65%173.89%-4.69%5.66%1.28%-13.98%21.72%31.81%2.67%-14.89%
GRT-UN.TO
Granite Real Estate Investment Trust
19.72%22.80%-4.30%15.18%-31.88%40.16%22.56%29.65%14.45%15.87%

Correlation

The correlation between ABX.TO and GRT-UN.TO is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.21

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.16

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.14

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.12

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 7, 2006

0.08

The correlation between ABX.TO and GRT-UN.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.08 (all time) to 0.21 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

ABX.TO:

CA$91.34B

GRT-UN.TO:

CA$5.83B

EPS

ABX.TO:

CA$3.60

GRT-UN.TO:

CA$6.39

PE Ratio

ABX.TO:

15.16

GRT-UN.TO:

15.07

PEG Ratio

ABX.TO:

0.17

GRT-UN.TO:

0.93

PS Ratio

ABX.TO:

4.86

GRT-UN.TO:

9.32

PB Ratio

ABX.TO:

3.34

GRT-UN.TO:

1.04

Total Revenue (TTM)

ABX.TO:

CA$19.02B

GRT-UN.TO:

CA$629.87M

Gross Profit (TTM)

ABX.TO:

CA$10.15B

GRT-UN.TO:

CA$517.51M

EBITDA (TTM)

ABX.TO:

CA$12.44B

GRT-UN.TO:

CA$513.85M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ABX.TO vs. GRT-UN.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ABX.TO
ABX.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
ABX.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ABX.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
ABX.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
ABX.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
ABX.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank

GRT-UN.TO
GRT-UN.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
GRT-UN.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GRT-UN.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
GRT-UN.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
GRT-UN.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
GRT-UN.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ABX.TO vs. GRT-UN.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Barrick Gold Corporation (ABX.TO) and Granite Real Estate Investment Trust (GRT-UN.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ABX.TOGRT-UN.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.13

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.28

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.37

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.55

3.20

+0.35

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.00

10.28

-1.29

ABX.TO vs. GRT-UN.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ABX.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.28, which is comparable to the GRT-UN.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ABX.TO and GRT-UN.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ABX.TOGRT-UN.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.28

2.15

+0.13

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

0.35

+0.16

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.29

0.65

-0.36

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.10

0.33

-0.23

Drawdowns

ABX.TO vs. GRT-UN.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ABX.TO drawdown since its inception was -84.65%, roughly equal to the maximum GRT-UN.TO drawdown of -87.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ABX.TO and GRT-UN.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ABX.TOGRT-UN.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-84.65%

-87.48%

+2.83%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-28.49%

-12.91%

-15.58%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.49%

-27.99%

-0.50%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-43.11%

-37.82%

-5.29%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-56.74%

-44.89%

-11.85%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-23.16%

-0.77%

-22.39%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-40.47%

-16.98%

-23.49%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.23%

4.01%

+7.22%

Volatility

ABX.TO vs. GRT-UN.TO - Volatility Comparison

Barrick Gold Corporation (ABX.TO) has a higher volatility of 16.64% compared to Granite Real Estate Investment Trust (GRT-UN.TO) at 5.88%. This indicates that ABX.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GRT-UN.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ABX.TOGRT-UN.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

16.64%

5.88%

+10.76%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

34.09%

14.87%

+19.22%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

44.43%

19.25%

+25.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

34.52%

21.88%

+12.64%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

35.90%

22.44%

+13.46%

Dividends

ABX.TO vs. GRT-UN.TO - Dividend Comparison

ABX.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.32%, less than GRT-UN.TO's 3.61% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ABX.TO
Barrick Gold Corporation
2.32%1.22%2.46%2.27%4.77%3.96%1.33%0.60%1.17%0.72%0.47%1.43%
GRT-UN.TO
Granite Real Estate Investment Trust
3.61%4.18%4.74%4.21%4.50%2.86%3.43%4.25%5.69%5.31%5.42%1.62%

Financials

ABX.TO vs. GRT-UN.TO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Barrick Gold Corporation and Granite Real Estate Investment Trust. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.001.00B2.00B3.00B4.00B5.00B6.00B20222023202420252026
5.16B
165.83M
(ABX.TO) Total Revenue
(GRT-UN.TO) Total Revenue
Values in CAD except per share items

ABX.TO vs. GRT-UN.TO - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Barrick Gold Corporation and Granite Real Estate Investment Trust over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%80.0%90.0%20222023202420252026
57.5%
81.0%
Portfolio components
ABX.TO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Barrick Gold Corporation reported a gross profit of 2.97B and revenue of 5.16B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 57.5%.

GRT-UN.TO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Granite Real Estate Investment Trust reported a gross profit of 134.27M and revenue of 165.83M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 81.0%.

ABX.TO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Barrick Gold Corporation reported an operating income of 2.93B and revenue of 5.16B, resulting in an operating margin of 56.7%.

GRT-UN.TO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Granite Real Estate Investment Trust reported an operating income of 122.29M and revenue of 165.83M, resulting in an operating margin of 73.7%.

ABX.TO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Barrick Gold Corporation reported a net income of 1.58B and revenue of 5.16B, resulting in a net margin of 30.5%.

GRT-UN.TO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Granite Real Estate Investment Trust reported a net income of 91.25M and revenue of 165.83M, resulting in a net margin of 55.0%.


Frequently Asked Questions


ABX.TO and GRT-UN.TO have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ABX.TO and GRT-UN.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer