PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ABRZX vs. QDSNX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ABRZX vs. QDSNX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Balanced-Risk Allocation Fund Class A (ABRZX) and AQR Diversifying Strategies Fund Class N (QDSNX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ABRZX achieves a 20.22% return, which is significantly higher than QDSNX's 6.23% return.


ABRZX

1D
0.20%
1M
1.34%
YTD
20.22%
6M
20.35%
1Y
29.57%
3Y*
11.95%
5Y*
4.33%
10Y*
4.83%

QDSNX

1D
1.02%
1M
1.71%
YTD
6.23%
6M
7.28%
1Y
14.86%
3Y*
13.69%
5Y*
10.97%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ABRZX vs. QDSNX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
ABRZX
Invesco Balanced-Risk Allocation Fund Class A
20.22%8.20%3.14%5.97%-14.96%9.36%14.26%
QDSNX
AQR Diversifying Strategies Fund Class N
6.23%16.14%9.56%8.62%14.48%10.35%5.40%

Correlation

The correlation between ABRZX and QDSNX is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.56

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.42

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.27

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 11, 2020

0.31

Over the past year, ABRZX and QDSNX have become more correlated (0.56) than their long-term average of 0.31, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ABRZX vs. QDSNX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ABRZX
ABRZX Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
ABRZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ABRZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
ABRZX Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
ABRZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
ABRZX Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank

QDSNX
QDSNX Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
QDSNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QDSNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
QDSNX Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
QDSNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
QDSNX Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ABRZX vs. QDSNX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Balanced-Risk Allocation Fund Class A (ABRZX) and AQR Diversifying Strategies Fund Class N (QDSNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ABRZXQDSNXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

3.41

3.12

+0.30

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

4.49

4.69

-0.20

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.69

1.61

+0.08

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

7.42

7.87

-0.44

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

26.97

22.79

+4.18

ABRZX vs. QDSNX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ABRZX Sharpe Ratio is 3.41, which is comparable to the QDSNX Sharpe Ratio of 3.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ABRZX and QDSNX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ABRZXQDSNXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.41

3.12

+0.30

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.36

1.44

-1.09

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.44

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.62

1.63

-1.01

Drawdowns

ABRZX vs. QDSNX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ABRZX drawdown since its inception was -26.62%, which is greater than QDSNX's maximum drawdown of -7.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ABRZX and QDSNX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ABRZXQDSNXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.62%

-7.15%

-19.47%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.07%

-1.97%

-2.10%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.28%

-6.93%

-11.35%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.33%

-7.15%

-12.18%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-26.62%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.10%

0.00%

-0.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.75%

-1.46%

-3.29%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.12%

0.68%

+0.44%

Volatility

ABRZX vs. QDSNX - Volatility Comparison

Invesco Balanced-Risk Allocation Fund Class A (ABRZX) has a higher volatility of 2.90% compared to AQR Diversifying Strategies Fund Class N (QDSNX) at 1.38%. This indicates that ABRZX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QDSNX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ABRZXQDSNXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.90%

1.38%

+1.52%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.89%

3.58%

+4.31%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.86%

5.00%

+3.86%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.21%

7.63%

+4.58%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.90%

7.31%

+3.59%

ABRZX vs. QDSNX - Expense Ratio Comparison

ABRZX has a 1.41% expense ratio, which is lower than QDSNX's 3.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

ABRZX vs. QDSNX - Dividend Comparison

ABRZX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.81%, more than QDSNX's 1.87% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ABRZX
Invesco Balanced-Risk Allocation Fund Class A
2.81%3.38%13.28%2.21%0.00%26.02%1.18%6.49%0.00%6.43%4.41%6.91%
QDSNX
AQR Diversifying Strategies Fund Class N
1.87%1.99%0.00%11.18%8.01%5.99%1.83%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


ABRZX and QDSNX have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ABRZX has higher volatility (2.90%) compared to QDSNX (1.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ABRZX dropped -26.62% vs QDSNX's -7.15%.

ABRZX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.41 vs 3.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ABRZX and QDSNX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer