ABRYX vs. GUG
Compare and contrast key facts about Invesco Balanced-Risk Allocation Fund (ABRYX) and Guggenheim Active Allocation Fund (GUG).
ABRYX is managed by Invesco. It was launched on Jun 1, 2009. GUG is an actively managed fund by Guggenheim. It was launched on Nov 23, 2021.
Performance
ABRYX vs. GUG - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
ABRYX vs. GUG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ABRYX Invesco Balanced-Risk Allocation Fund | 11.77% | 8.50% | 3.34% | 6.34% | -14.82% | 0.17% |
GUG Guggenheim Active Allocation Fund | 1.54% | 13.12% | 11.46% | 20.68% | -26.55% | -0.20% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ABRYX achieves a 11.77% return, which is significantly higher than GUG's 1.54% return.
ABRYX
- 1D
- 0.97%
- 1M
- -0.95%
- YTD
- 11.77%
- 6M
- 13.89%
- 1Y
- 19.48%
- 3Y*
- 9.06%
- 5Y*
- 4.26%
- 10Y*
- 4.93%
GUG
- 1D
- 1.74%
- 1M
- -3.78%
- YTD
- 1.54%
- 6M
- 2.11%
- 1Y
- 10.74%
- 3Y*
- 13.02%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
ABRYX vs. GUG - Expense Ratio Comparison
ABRYX has a 1.06% expense ratio, which is lower than GUG's 3.86% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
ABRYX vs. GUG — Risk / Return Rank
ABRYX
GUG
ABRYX vs. GUG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Balanced-Risk Allocation Fund (ABRYX) and Guggenheim Active Allocation Fund (GUG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ABRYX | GUG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.05 | 0.80 | +1.25 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.65 | 1.18 | +1.47 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | 1.15 | +0.26 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.70 | 1.18 | +1.53 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.71 | 3.37 | +7.34 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ABRYX | GUG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.05 | 0.80 | +1.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.35 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.46 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.61 | 0.17 | +0.44 |
Correlation
The correlation between ABRYX and GUG is 0.29, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
ABRYX vs. GUG - Dividend Comparison
ABRYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.17%, less than GUG's 9.36% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ABRYX Invesco Balanced-Risk Allocation Fund | 3.17% | 3.55% | 13.21% | 2.43% | 0.00% | 25.72% | 1.40% | 6.66% | 0.00% | 6.34% | 4.36% | 7.17% |
GUG Guggenheim Active Allocation Fund | 9.36% | 9.30% | 9.58% | 9.72% | 9.71% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
ABRYX vs. GUG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ABRYX drawdown since its inception was -26.63%, smaller than the maximum GUG drawdown of -32.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ABRYX and GUG.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| ABRYX | GUG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -26.63% | -32.78% | +6.15% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.93% | -8.45% | +1.52% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.17% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -26.63% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.39% | -5.44% | +3.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.68% | -12.02% | +7.34% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.75% | 2.94% | -1.19% |
Volatility
ABRYX vs. GUG - Volatility Comparison
Invesco Balanced-Risk Allocation Fund (ABRYX) has a higher volatility of 4.01% compared to Guggenheim Active Allocation Fund (GUG) at 3.35%. This indicates that ABRYX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GUG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| ABRYX | GUG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.01% | 3.35% | +0.66% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.55% | 8.66% | -1.11% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.37% | 13.43% | -4.06% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.13% | 17.72% | -5.59% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.88% | 17.72% | -6.84% |