PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ABRVX vs. GTAPX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ABRVX vs. GTAPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ABR Dynamic Blend Equity & Volatility Fund (ABRVX) and Quantitative U.S. Long/Short Equity Portfolio (GTAPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ABRVX achieves a 10.02% return, which is significantly higher than GTAPX's 5.43% return. Over the past 10 years, ABRVX has outperformed GTAPX with an annualized return of 6.77%, while GTAPX has yielded a comparatively lower 5.77% annualized return.


ABRVX

1D
0.16%
1M
4.77%
YTD
10.02%
6M
9.44%
1Y
20.91%
3Y*
8.14%
5Y*
1.24%
10Y*
6.77%

GTAPX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.30%
YTD
5.43%
6M
7.29%
1Y
14.91%
3Y*
12.02%
5Y*
8.76%
10Y*
5.77%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ABRVX vs. GTAPX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ABRVX
ABR Dynamic Blend Equity & Volatility Fund
10.02%-0.70%11.76%8.89%-27.36%15.95%49.42%9.08%-3.28%9.50%
GTAPX
Quantitative U.S. Long/Short Equity Portfolio
5.43%12.79%13.28%4.42%3.16%17.72%-5.16%3.26%-8.65%8.74%

Correlation

The correlation between ABRVX and GTAPX is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.34

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.34

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.36

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.41

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2016

0.42

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ABRVX vs. GTAPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ABRVX
ABRVX Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
ABRVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ABRVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
ABRVX Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
ABRVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
ABRVX Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank

GTAPX
GTAPX Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
GTAPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GTAPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
GTAPX Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
GTAPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
GTAPX Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ABRVX vs. GTAPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ABR Dynamic Blend Equity & Volatility Fund (ABRVX) and Quantitative U.S. Long/Short Equity Portfolio (GTAPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ABRVXGTAPXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.30

2.22

+0.08

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.31

3.29

+0.02

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.39

+0.04

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.12

5.00

-1.88

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

11.10

15.60

-4.50

ABRVX vs. GTAPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ABRVX Sharpe Ratio is 2.30, which is comparable to the GTAPX Sharpe Ratio of 2.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ABRVX and GTAPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ABRVXGTAPXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.30

2.22

+0.08

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.10

0.81

-0.71

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.50

0.57

-0.07

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.50

0.40

+0.10

Drawdowns

ABRVX vs. GTAPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ABRVX drawdown since its inception was -29.71%, roughly equal to the maximum GTAPX drawdown of -30.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ABRVX and GTAPX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ABRVXGTAPXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-29.71%

-30.40%

+0.69%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.93%

-3.01%

-3.92%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.65%

-12.21%

-8.44%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.71%

-12.21%

-17.50%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-29.71%

-30.40%

+0.69%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.93%

-0.22%

-3.71%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.39%

-7.04%

-4.35%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.94%

0.96%

+0.98%

Volatility

ABRVX vs. GTAPX - Volatility Comparison

ABR Dynamic Blend Equity & Volatility Fund (ABRVX) has a higher volatility of 2.62% compared to Quantitative U.S. Long/Short Equity Portfolio (GTAPX) at 2.05%. This indicates that ABRVX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GTAPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ABRVXGTAPXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.62%

2.05%

+0.57%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.61%

5.01%

+1.60%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.39%

6.77%

+2.62%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.50%

10.89%

+1.61%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.66%

10.22%

+3.44%

ABRVX vs. GTAPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

ABRVX has a 1.98% expense ratio, which is higher than GTAPX's 1.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

ABRVX vs. GTAPX - Dividend Comparison

ABRVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.15%, less than GTAPX's 15.73% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
ABRVX
ABR Dynamic Blend Equity & Volatility Fund
1.15%1.26%2.07%0.00%0.00%8.33%24.49%0.80%3.95%3.26%1.29%
GTAPX
Quantitative U.S. Long/Short Equity Portfolio
15.73%16.63%11.79%11.23%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.96%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


ABRVX and GTAPX have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ABRVX has higher volatility (2.62%) compared to GTAPX (2.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ABRVX dropped -29.71% vs GTAPX's -30.40%.

ABRVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.30 vs 2.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ABRVX and GTAPX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer