ABRVX vs. GTAPX

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

ABRVX (ABR Dynamic Blend Equity & Volatility Fund) and GTAPX (Quantitative U.S. Long/Short Equity Portfolio) are both Long-Short funds. Over the past 10 years, ABRVX returned 6.38%/yr vs 6.13%/yr for GTAPX. Their 0.42 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. ABRVX charges 1.98%/yr vs 1.25%/yr for GTAPX.

Performance

ABRVX vs. GTAPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ABR Dynamic Blend Equity & Volatility Fund (ABRVX) and Quantitative U.S. Long/Short Equity Portfolio (GTAPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ABRVX achieves a 4.65% return, which is significantly lower than GTAPX's 9.72% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with ABRVX having a 6.38% annualized return and GTAPX not far behind at 6.13%.

ABRVX

• 1D: 0.86%
• 1M: -1.27%
• 6M: 3.72%
• YTD: 4.65%
• 1Y: 11.65%
• 3Y*: 4.61%
• 5Y*: -0.48%
• 10Y*: 6.38%
• ALL TIME*: 6.08%

GTAPX

• 1D: 0.21%
• 1M: 5.25%
• 6M: 7.39%
• YTD: 9.72%
• 1Y: 18.62%
• 3Y*: 11.96%
• 5Y*: 9.97%
• 10Y*: 6.13%
• ALL TIME*: 4.00%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
ABRVX ABR Dynamic Blend Equity & Volatility Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
GTAPX Quantitative U.S. Long/Short Equity Portfolio	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

ABRVX vs. GTAPX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
ABRVX ABR Dynamic Blend Equity & Volatility Fund	4.65%	-0.70%	11.76%	8.89%	-27.36%	15.95%	49.42%	9.08%	-3.28%	9.50%
GTAPX Quantitative U.S. Long/Short Equity Portfolio	9.72%	12.79%	13.28%	4.42%	3.16%	17.72%	-5.16%	3.26%	-8.65%	8.74%

Correlation

The correlation between ABRVX and GTAPX is 0.26, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.26
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.32
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.34
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.40
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2016	0.42

The correlation between ABRVX and GTAPX shifts across timeframes, from 0.26 (1 year) to 0.42 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

ABRVX vs. GTAPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

ABRVX

ABRVX Risk / Return Rank: 28
ABRVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 28
ABRVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 27
ABRVX Omega Ratio Rank: 28
ABRVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 31
ABRVX Martin Ratio Rank: 27

GTAPX

GTAPX Risk / Return Rank: 96
GTAPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
GTAPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 96
GTAPX Omega Ratio Rank: 90
GTAPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
GTAPX Martin Ratio Rank: 97

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

ABRVX vs. GTAPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ABR Dynamic Blend Equity & Volatility Fund (ABRVX) and Quantitative U.S. Long/Short Equity Portfolio (GTAPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ABRVX	GTAPX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.95	2.75	-1.81
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.38	4.17	-2.79
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.17	1.50	-0.32
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.37	6.37	-4.99
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.89	20.02	-16.13

ABRVX vs. GTAPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ABRVX Sharpe Ratio is 0.95, which is lower than the GTAPX Sharpe Ratio of 2.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ABRVX and GTAPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

ABRVX vs. GTAPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ABRVX drawdown since its inception was -29.71%, roughly equal to the maximum GTAPX drawdown of -30.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ABRVX and GTAPX.

Drawdown Indicators

	ABRVX	GTAPX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-29.71%	-30.40%	+0.69%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.93%	-3.01%	-3.92%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-20.65%	-12.21%	-8.44%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-29.71%	-12.21%	-17.50%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-29.71%	-30.40%	+0.69%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-8.62%	0.00%	-8.62%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-11.32%	-6.98%	-4.34%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.45%	0.95%	+1.50%

Volatility

ABRVX vs. GTAPX - Volatility Comparison

ABR Dynamic Blend Equity & Volatility Fund (ABRVX) has a higher volatility of 2.70% compared to Quantitative U.S. Long/Short Equity Portfolio (GTAPX) at 2.03%. This indicates that ABRVX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GTAPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ABRVX	GTAPX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.70%	2.03%	+0.67%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.38%	5.42%	+1.96%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.07%	6.96%	+3.11%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.57%	10.89%	+1.68%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.70%	10.24%	+3.46%

ABRVX vs. GTAPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

ABRVX has a 1.98% expense ratio, which is higher than GTAPX's 1.25% expense ratio.

Dividends

ABRVX vs. GTAPX - Dividend Comparison

ABRVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.21%, less than GTAPX's 14.99% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
ABRVX ABR Dynamic Blend Equity & Volatility Fund	1.21%	1.26%	2.07%	0.00%	0.00%	8.33%	24.49%	0.80%	3.95%	3.26%	1.29%
GTAPX Quantitative U.S. Long/Short Equity Portfolio	14.99%	16.63%	11.79%	11.23%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.96%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ABRVX and GTAPX in my portfolio?

ABRVX and GTAPX have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ABRVX or GTAPX?

ABRVX has higher volatility (2.70%) compared to GTAPX (2.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ABRVX dropped -29.71% vs GTAPX's -30.40%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GTAPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.75 vs 0.95), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.