ABRSX vs. QAMNX

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about ABR 50/50 Volatility Fund (ABRSX) and Federated Hermes MDT Market Neutral A (QAMNX).

ABRSX is managed by ABR. It was launched on Oct 1, 2017. QAMNX is managed by Federated. It was launched on Sep 30, 2008.

Performance

ABRSX vs. QAMNX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ABR 50/50 Volatility Fund (ABRSX) and Federated Hermes MDT Market Neutral A (QAMNX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

ABRSX vs. QAMNX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
ABRSX ABR 50/50 Volatility Fund	-14.32%	6.22%	13.84%	38.75%	-34.12%	10.97%
QAMNX Federated Hermes MDT Market Neutral A	1.36%	10.00%	17.33%	4.71%	9.19%	12.29%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ABRSX achieves a -14.32% return, which is significantly lower than QAMNX's 1.36% return.

ABRSX

• 1D: 3.89%
• 1M: -12.82%
• YTD: -14.32%
• 6M: -9.86%
• 1Y: -3.75%
• 3Y*: 9.45%
• 5Y*: 4.26%
• 10Y*: —

QAMNX

• 1D: -0.05%
• 1M: -0.05%
• YTD: 1.36%
• 6M: 5.54%
• 1Y: 7.82%
• 3Y*: 10.36%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ABRSX vs. QAMNX - Expense Ratio Comparison

ABRSX has a 2.00% expense ratio, which is higher than QAMNX's 1.86% expense ratio.

ABRSX

ABR 50/50 Volatility Fund

QAMNX

Federated Hermes MDT Market Neutral A

Return for Risk

ABRSX vs. QAMNX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ABRSX

ABRSX Risk / Return Rank: 4
ABRSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3
ABRSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4
ABRSX Omega Ratio Rank: 4
ABRSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4
ABRSX Martin Ratio Rank: 4

QAMNX

QAMNX Risk / Return Rank: 69
QAMNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 67
QAMNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 73
QAMNX Omega Ratio Rank: 69
QAMNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 79
QAMNX Martin Ratio Rank: 56

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ABRSX vs. QAMNX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ABR 50/50 Volatility Fund (ABRSX) and Federated Hermes MDT Market Neutral A (QAMNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ABRSX	QAMNX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.12	1.23	-1.36
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.02	1.90	-1.88
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.00	1.27	-0.27
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.14	1.97	-2.11
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-0.36	5.71	-6.06
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ABRSX vs. QAMNX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ABRSX Sharpe Ratio is -0.12, which is lower than the QAMNX Sharpe Ratio of 1.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ABRSX and QAMNX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ABRSX	QAMNX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.12	1.23	-1.36
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.15	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.11	0.87	-0.76

Correlation

The correlation between ABRSX and QAMNX is 0.03, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

ABRSX vs. QAMNX - Dividend Comparison

ABRSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.74%, less than QAMNX's 1.51% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
ABRSX ABR 50/50 Volatility Fund	0.74%	0.63%	1.04%	0.00%	0.00%	47.19%	0.00%	10.50%	12.88%	0.99%
QAMNX Federated Hermes MDT Market Neutral A	1.51%	1.53%	1.85%	5.89%	11.74%	20.80%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

ABRSX vs. QAMNX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ABRSX drawdown since its inception was -49.78%, which is greater than QAMNX's maximum drawdown of -17.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ABRSX and QAMNX.

Drawdown Indicators

	ABRSX	QAMNX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-49.78%	-17.97%	-31.81%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-21.19%	-4.16%	-17.03%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-44.57%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-15.86%	-0.42%	-15.44%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-16.16%	-5.25%	-10.91%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	8.45%	1.44%	+7.01%

Volatility

ABRSX vs. QAMNX - Volatility Comparison

ABR 50/50 Volatility Fund (ABRSX) has a higher volatility of 13.73% compared to Federated Hermes MDT Market Neutral A (QAMNX) at 1.03%. This indicates that ABRSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QAMNX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ABRSX	QAMNX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	13.73%	1.03%	+12.70%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	18.61%	4.88%	+13.73%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	28.16%	6.38%	+21.78%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	27.78%	14.04%	+13.74%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	36.49%	14.04%	+22.45%