ABPYX vs. DGTSX
ABPYX (The AB Portfolios - AB Sustainable Thematic Balanced Portfolio) and DGTSX (DFA Global Allocation 25/75 Portfolio) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. Over the past 10 years, ABPYX returned 4.07%/yr vs 5.32%/yr for DGTSX. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. ABPYX charges 0.71%/yr vs 0.24%/yr for DGTSX.
Performance
ABPYX vs. DGTSX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ABPYX achieves a 2.73% return, which is significantly lower than DGTSX's 4.09% return. Over the past 10 years, ABPYX has underperformed DGTSX with an annualized return of 4.07%, while DGTSX has yielded a comparatively higher 5.32% annualized return.
ABPYX
- 1D
- 0.23%
- 1M
- -0.30%
- YTD
- 2.73%
- 6M
- 1.86%
- 1Y
- 6.97%
- 3Y*
- 7.34%
- 5Y*
- 1.75%
- 10Y*
- 4.07%
DGTSX
- 1D
- 0.14%
- 1M
- 0.21%
- YTD
- 4.09%
- 6M
- 3.87%
- 1Y
- 8.77%
- 3Y*
- 8.32%
- 5Y*
- 5.19%
- 10Y*
- 5.32%
ABPYX vs. DGTSX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ABPYX The AB Portfolios - AB Sustainable Thematic Balanced Portfolio | 2.73% | 6.68% | 5.94% | 14.47% | -19.36% | 8.86% | 4.62% | 14.94% | -5.40% | 8.59% |
DGTSX DFA Global Allocation 25/75 Portfolio | 4.09% | 8.39% | 7.43% | 8.93% | -8.06% | 10.20% | 7.29% | 9.80% | -1.85% | 5.83% |
Correlation
The correlation between ABPYX and DGTSX is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 26, 2003 | 0.91 |
The correlation between ABPYX and DGTSX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ABPYX vs. DGTSX — Risk / Return Rank
ABPYX
DGTSX
ABPYX vs. DGTSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The AB Portfolios - AB Sustainable Thematic Balanced Portfolio (ABPYX) and DFA Global Allocation 25/75 Portfolio (DGTSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ABPYX | DGTSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.72 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.54 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 1.52 | -0.37 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.84 | 3.50 | -2.66 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.68 | 15.29 | -12.61 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ABPYX vs. DGTSX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ABPYX drawdown since its inception was -28.37%, which is greater than DGTSX's maximum drawdown of -16.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ABPYX and DGTSX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ABPYX | DGTSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -28.37% | -16.71% | -11.66% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.17% | -2.64% | -6.53% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.63% | -7.46% | -8.17% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.00% | -11.26% | -14.74% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -26.00% | -11.26% | -14.74% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.35% | -0.34% | -1.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.92% | -1.64% | -2.28% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.86% | 0.60% | +2.26% |
Volatility
ABPYX vs. DGTSX - Volatility Comparison
The AB Portfolios - AB Sustainable Thematic Balanced Portfolio (ABPYX) has a higher volatility of 3.29% compared to DFA Global Allocation 25/75 Portfolio (DGTSX) at 1.41%. This indicates that ABPYX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DGTSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ABPYX | DGTSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.29% | 1.41% | +1.88% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.17% | 2.99% | +4.18% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.15% | 3.60% | +5.55% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.09% | 5.98% | +6.11% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.21% | 5.24% | +4.97% |
ABPYX vs. DGTSX - Expense Ratio Comparison
ABPYX has a 0.71% expense ratio, which is higher than DGTSX's 0.24% expense ratio.
Dividends
ABPYX vs. DGTSX - Dividend Comparison
ABPYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.47%, less than DGTSX's 5.71% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ABPYX The AB Portfolios - AB Sustainable Thematic Balanced Portfolio | 1.47% | 1.51% | 1.51% | 1.14% | 4.40% | 3.61% | 3.73% | 3.72% | 1.08% | 7.92% | 2.76% | 2.35% |
DGTSX DFA Global Allocation 25/75 Portfolio | 4.75% | 5.54% | 7.28% | 4.75% | 2.77% | 7.62% | 2.12% | 2.57% | 2.99% | 1.25% | 1.26% | 1.50% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.90, ABPYX and DGTSX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
ABPYX has higher volatility (3.29%) compared to DGTSX (1.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ABPYX dropped -28.37% vs DGTSX's -16.71%.
DGTSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.56 vs 0.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ABPYX and DGTSX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer