ABOT vs. IETC
ABOT (Abacus FCF Innovation Leaders ETF) and IETC (iShares U.S. Tech Independence Focused ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ABOT is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the FCF US Quality Innovation Index, while IETC is a Technology Equities fund actively managed by iShares. ABOT is passively managed, while IETC is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, ABOT returned 8.30%/yr vs 12.62%/yr for IETC. Their correlation of 0.86 means they have usually moved in the same direction. ABOT charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for IETC.
Performance
ABOT vs. IETC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ABOT achieves a 3.40% return, which is significantly higher than IETC's -0.96% return.
ABOT
- 1D
- 2.30%
- 1M
- 6.06%
- 6M
- 7.53%
- YTD
- 3.40%
- 1Y
- 2.78%
- 3Y*
- 15.94%
- 5Y*
- 8.30%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 10.39%
IETC
- 1D
- -0.52%
- 1M
- -2.31%
- 6M
- -0.16%
- YTD
- -0.96%
- 1Y
- 2.47%
- 3Y*
- 21.66%
- 5Y*
- 12.62%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 19.51%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $16.44K | $16.85K | $12.49K | |
| $8.18M | $5.79M | $5.78M |
ABOT vs. IETC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ABOT Abacus FCF Innovation Leaders ETF | 3.40% | 8.42% | 31.93% | 26.92% | -24.05% | 18.51% | 3.29% |
IETC iShares U.S. Tech Independence Focused ETF | -0.96% | 19.56% | 37.57% | 54.35% | -32.78% | 29.73% | 2.68% |
Correlation
The correlation between ABOT and IETC is 0.68, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.68 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.83 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.86 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 8, 2020 | 0.86 |
The correlation between ABOT and IETC shifts across timeframes, from 0.68 (1 year) to 0.86 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ABOT vs. IETC — Risk / Return Rank
ABOT
IETC
ABOT vs. IETC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Abacus FCF Innovation Leaders ETF (ABOT) and iShares U.S. Tech Independence Focused ETF (IETC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ABOT | IETC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.04 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.03 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.04 | 1.04 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.13 | 0.12 | +0.01 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.30 | 0.29 | +0.01 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ABOT vs. IETC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ABOT drawdown since its inception was -29.71%, smaller than the maximum IETC drawdown of -38.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ABOT and IETC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ABOT | IETC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -29.71% | -38.48% | +8.77% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -21.54% | -21.19% | -0.35% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.72% | -25.17% | +2.45% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.71% | -38.48% | +8.77% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.53% | -14.99% | +11.46% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.39% | -8.18% | -1.21% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.28% | 8.57% | +0.71% |
Volatility
ABOT vs. IETC - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Abacus FCF Innovation Leaders ETF (ABOT) is 5.81%, while iShares U.S. Tech Independence Focused ETF (IETC) has a volatility of 7.15%. This indicates that ABOT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IETC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ABOT | IETC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.81% | 7.15% | -1.34% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.77% | 18.96% | -3.19% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.83% | 23.57% | -4.74% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.87% | 25.00% | -5.13% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.74% | 25.48% | -5.74% |
ABOT vs. IETC - Expense Ratio Comparison
ABOT has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than IETC's 0.18% expense ratio.
Dividends
ABOT vs. IETC - Dividend Comparison
ABOT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.33%, less than IETC's 0.42% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ABOT Abacus FCF Innovation Leaders ETF | 0.33% | 0.38% | 1.28% | 0.77% | 1.20% | 4.77% | 0.02% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IETC iShares U.S. Tech Independence Focused ETF | 0.42% | 0.38% | 0.52% | 0.79% | 0.92% | 0.73% | 0.48% | 0.95% | 1.27% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ABOT and IETC have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IETC has higher volatility (7.15%) compared to ABOT (5.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ABOT dropped -29.71% vs IETC's -38.48%.
On 5-year performance, IETC leads with 12.62% vs 8.30% for ABOT. On fees, IETC is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, ABOT has been the lower-risk option at 5.81%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, IETC has performed better with a 12.62% return vs 8.30%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IETC is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for ABOT.
IETC has the higher dividend yield at 0.42%, compared with 0.33% for ABOT.
ABOT is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while IETC is Technology Equities. They also come from different issuers: Abacus and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for ABOT and 0.18% for IETC.
ABOT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.15 vs 0.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ABOT and IETC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer