ABNG vs. XTJL
ABNG (Leverage Shares 2x Long ABNB Daily ETF) and XTJL (Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF - July) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.53 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ABNG charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for XTJL.
Performance
ABNG vs. XTJL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ABNG achieves a -5.80% return, which is significantly lower than XTJL's 5.67% return.
ABNG
- 1D
- -4.57%
- 1M
- 8.99%
- YTD
- -5.80%
- 6M
- -7.81%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XTJL
- 1D
- 0.07%
- 1M
- 0.51%
- YTD
- 5.67%
- 6M
- 5.52%
- 1Y
- 14.97%
- 3Y*
- 14.44%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ABNG vs. XTJL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
ABNG Leverage Shares 2x Long ABNB Daily ETF | -5.80% | 23.24% |
XTJL Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF - July | 5.67% | 2.43% |
Correlation
The correlation between ABNG and XTJL is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 17, 2025 | 0.53 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ABNG vs. XTJL — Risk / Return Rank
ABNG
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
XTJL
ABNG vs. XTJL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2x Long ABNB Daily ETF (ABNG) and Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF - July (XTJL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ABNG | XTJL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.45 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.94 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 16.63 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ABNG vs. XTJL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ABNG drawdown since its inception was -33.03%, which is greater than XTJL's maximum drawdown of -23.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ABNG and XTJL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ABNG | XTJL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.03% | -23.24% | -9.79% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -5.12% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -16.70% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.21% | 0.00% | -11.21% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.31% | -4.00% | -8.31% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.90% | — |
Volatility
ABNG vs. XTJL - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ABNG | XTJL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.36% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 5.66% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 63.20% | 7.36% | +55.84% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 63.20% | 15.14% | +48.06% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 63.20% | 15.14% | +48.06% |
ABNG vs. XTJL - Expense Ratio Comparison
ABNG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than XTJL's 0.79% expense ratio.
Dividends
ABNG vs. XTJL - Dividend Comparison
Neither ABNG nor XTJL has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
ABNG and XTJL have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ABNG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ABNG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for XTJL.
ABNG and XTJL have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for ABNG and 0.79% for XTJL.
Find the right allocation for ABNG and XTJL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer