ABNG vs. VRTL
ABNG (Leverage Shares 2x Long ABNB Daily ETF) and VRTL (GraniteShares 2x Long VRT Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.13 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ABNG charges 0.75%/yr vs 1.50%/yr for VRTL.
Performance
ABNG vs. VRTL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ABNG achieves a -5.80% return, which is significantly lower than VRTL's 272.11% return.
ABNG
- 1D
- -4.57%
- 1M
- 8.99%
- YTD
- -5.80%
- 6M
- -7.81%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VRTL
- 1D
- 14.98%
- 1M
- 14.61%
- YTD
- 272.11%
- 6M
- 250.93%
- 1Y
- 458.39%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ABNG vs. VRTL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
ABNG Leverage Shares 2x Long ABNB Daily ETF | -5.80% | 23.24% |
VRTL GraniteShares 2x Long VRT Daily ETF | 272.11% | -14.68% |
Correlation
The correlation between ABNG and VRTL is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 17, 2025 | 0.13 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ABNG vs. VRTL — Risk / Return Rank
ABNG
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
VRTL
ABNG vs. VRTL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2x Long ABNB Daily ETF (ABNG) and GraniteShares 2x Long VRT Daily ETF (VRTL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ABNG | VRTL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.43 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 9.74 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 22.96 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ABNG vs. VRTL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ABNG drawdown since its inception was -33.03%, smaller than the maximum VRTL drawdown of -60.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ABNG and VRTL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ABNG | VRTL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.03% | -60.58% | +27.55% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -47.45% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.21% | -14.57% | +3.36% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.31% | -15.87% | +3.56% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 20.09% | — |
Volatility
ABNG vs. VRTL - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ABNG | VRTL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 35.04% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 88.31% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 63.20% | 117.72% | -54.52% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 63.20% | 125.29% | -62.09% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 63.20% | 125.29% | -62.09% |
ABNG vs. VRTL - Expense Ratio Comparison
ABNG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than VRTL's 1.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
ABNG vs. VRTL - Dividend Comparison
Neither ABNG nor VRTL has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
ABNG and VRTL have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ABNG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ABNG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for VRTL.
ABNG and VRTL have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and GraniteShares. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for ABNG and 1.50% for VRTL.
Find the right allocation for ABNG and VRTL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer