ABNG vs. CRMG
ABNG (Leverage Shares 2x Long ABNB Daily ETF) and CRMG (Leverage Shares 2X Long CRM Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds from Leverage Shares. Both are actively managed. At a 0.37 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.75% expense ratio.
Performance
ABNG vs. CRMG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ABNG achieves a 2.14% return, which is significantly higher than CRMG's -65.13% return.
ABNG
- 1D
- -2.38%
- 1M
- 6.16%
- 6M
- 11.17%
- YTD
- 2.14%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CRMG
- 1D
- -2.25%
- 1M
- 18.32%
- 6M
- -51.86%
- YTD
- -65.13%
- 1Y
- -67.15%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ABNG vs. CRMG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
ABNG Leverage Shares 2x Long ABNB Daily ETF | 2.14% | 23.24% |
CRMG Leverage Shares 2X Long CRM Daily ETF | -65.13% | 15.40% |
Correlation
The correlation between ABNG and CRMG is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 17, 2025 | 0.37 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ABNG vs. CRMG — Risk / Return Rank
ABNG
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
CRMG
ABNG vs. CRMG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2x Long ABNB Daily ETF (ABNG) and Leverage Shares 2X Long CRM Daily ETF (CRMG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ABNG | CRMG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 0.84 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | -0.89 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | -1.47 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ABNG vs. CRMG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ABNG drawdown since its inception was -33.03%, smaller than the maximum CRMG drawdown of -79.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ABNG and CRMG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ABNG | CRMG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.03% | -79.83% | +46.80% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -75.82% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.68% | -74.49% | +69.81% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.39% | -41.14% | +29.75% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 45.60% | — |
Volatility
ABNG vs. CRMG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ABNG | CRMG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 23.23% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 64.26% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 63.37% | 77.99% | -14.62% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 63.37% | 75.67% | -12.30% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 63.37% | 75.67% | -12.30% |
ABNG vs. CRMG - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both ABNG and CRMG have an expense ratio of 0.75%.
Dividends
ABNG vs. CRMG - Dividend Comparison
Neither ABNG nor CRMG has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
ABNG and CRMG have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.75% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ABNG and CRMG have the same expense ratio: 0.75% per year.
ABNG and CRMG have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
Find the right allocation for ABNG and CRMG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer