PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ABNDX vs. PCGTX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ABNDX vs. PCGTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in The Bond Fund of America Class A (ABNDX) and PACE Mortgage-Backed Securities Fixed Income Investments (PCGTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ABNDX achieves a -1.17% return, which is significantly lower than PCGTX's 1.84% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with ABNDX having a 1.42% annualized return and PCGTX not far behind at 1.37%.


ABNDX

1D
0.18%
1M
-1.33%
6M
-1.23%
YTD
-1.17%
1Y
1.16%
3Y*
3.57%
5Y*
-0.87%
10Y*
1.42%
ALL TIME*
4.15%

PCGTX

1D
0.39%
1M
-1.06%
6M
1.66%
YTD
1.84%
1Y
5.30%
3Y*
4.89%
5Y*
-0.05%
10Y*
1.37%
ALL TIME*
3.96%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

ABNDX vs. PCGTX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ABNDX
The Bond Fund of America Class A
-1.17%7.16%1.17%4.34%-13.24%-1.33%10.72%7.83%-0.12%3.21%
PCGTX
PACE Mortgage-Backed Securities Fixed Income Investments
1.84%7.84%0.98%5.12%-13.48%-0.61%5.75%6.55%0.17%2.83%

Correlation

The correlation between ABNDX and PCGTX is 0.83, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.83

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.89

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.90

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.83

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 18, 1995

0.76

The correlation between ABNDX and PCGTX shifts across timeframes, from 0.76 (all time) to 0.90 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ABNDX vs. PCGTX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

ABNDX
ABNDX Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
ABNDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ABNDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
ABNDX Omega Ratio Rank: 77
Omega Ratio Rank
ABNDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
ABNDX Martin Ratio Rank: 88
Martin Ratio Rank

PCGTX
PCGTX Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
PCGTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PCGTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
PCGTX Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
PCGTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
PCGTX Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

ABNDX vs. PCGTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The Bond Fund of America Class A (ABNDX) and PACE Mortgage-Backed Securities Fixed Income Investments (PCGTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ABNDXPCGTXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.88

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.58

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.06

1.26

-0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.40

2.25

-1.85

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.95

6.10

-5.14

ABNDX vs. PCGTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ABNDX Sharpe Ratio is 0.34, which is lower than the PCGTX Sharpe Ratio of 1.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ABNDX and PCGTX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ABNDX vs. PCGTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ABNDX drawdown since its inception was -18.18%, smaller than the maximum PCGTX drawdown of -19.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ABNDX and PCGTX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ABNDXPCGTXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.18%

-19.34%

+1.16%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.13%

-3.09%

-0.04%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.15%

-6.80%

+1.65%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.14%

-19.19%

+1.05%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-18.18%

-19.34%

+1.16%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.29%

-2.44%

-1.85%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.22%

-1.85%

-1.37%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.31%

1.11%

+0.20%

Volatility

ABNDX vs. PCGTX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for The Bond Fund of America Class A (ABNDX) is 1.00%, while PACE Mortgage-Backed Securities Fixed Income Investments (PCGTX) has a volatility of 1.58%. This indicates that ABNDX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PCGTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ABNDXPCGTXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.00%

1.58%

-0.58%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.00%

4.77%

-1.77%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.69%

5.67%

-1.98%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.97%

7.22%

-1.25%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.89%

5.43%

-0.54%

ABNDX vs. PCGTX - Expense Ratio Comparison

ABNDX has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than PCGTX's 0.73% expense ratio.


Dividends

ABNDX vs. PCGTX - Dividend Comparison

ABNDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.84%, less than PCGTX's 4.23% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ABNDX
The Bond Fund of America Class A
3.84%4.13%4.30%3.24%2.17%1.62%5.03%3.49%2.38%1.84%1.77%2.00%
PCGTX
PACE Mortgage-Backed Securities Fixed Income Investments
4.23%3.78%5.36%5.02%3.67%2.87%3.23%3.53%3.34%2.96%2.71%2.21%

Frequently Asked Questions


ABNDX and PCGTX have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PCGTX has higher volatility (1.58%) compared to ABNDX (1.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ABNDX dropped -18.18% vs PCGTX's -19.34%.

PCGTX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.23 vs 0.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ABNDX and PCGTX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer