PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ABNDX vs. BND
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ABNDX vs. BND - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Funds The Bond Fund of America (ABNDX) and Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF (BND). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ABNDX achieves a -1.08% return, which is significantly lower than BND's -0.54% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with ABNDX having a 1.41% annualized return and BND not far behind at 1.36%.


ABNDX

1D
0.00%
1M
-1.25%
6M
-1.31%
YTD
-1.08%
1Y
1.34%
3Y*
3.38%
5Y*
-0.81%
10Y*
1.41%
ALL TIME*
4.15%

BND

1D
-0.26%
1M
-1.20%
6M
-0.75%
YTD
-0.54%
1Y
1.75%
3Y*
3.92%
5Y*
-0.42%
10Y*
1.36%
ALL TIME*
2.99%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$451.00M$507.49M$592.68M

ABNDX vs. BND - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ABNDX
American Funds The Bond Fund of America
-1.08%7.16%1.17%4.34%-13.24%-1.33%10.72%7.83%-0.12%3.21%
BND
Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF
-0.54%7.08%1.38%5.65%-13.11%-1.86%7.71%8.84%-0.12%3.57%

Correlation

The correlation between ABNDX and BND is 0.92, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.95

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 10, 2007

0.87

The correlation between ABNDX and BND has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ABNDX vs. BND — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

ABNDX
ABNDX Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
ABNDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ABNDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
ABNDX Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
ABNDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
ABNDX Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank

BND
BND Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
BND Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BND Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
BND Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
BND Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
BND Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

ABNDX vs. BND - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Funds The Bond Fund of America (ABNDX) and Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF (BND). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ABNDXBNDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.03

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

1.12

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.84

0.99

-0.15

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.03

2.48

-0.45

ABNDX vs. BND - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ABNDX Sharpe Ratio is 0.69, which is comparable to the BND Sharpe Ratio of 0.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ABNDX and BND, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ABNDX vs. BND - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ABNDX drawdown since its inception was -18.18%, roughly equal to the maximum BND drawdown of -18.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ABNDX and BND.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ABNDXBNDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.18%

-18.58%

+0.40%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.13%

-2.68%

-0.45%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.15%

-4.81%

-0.34%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.15%

-17.91%

-0.24%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-18.18%

-18.58%

+0.40%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.20%

-3.15%

-1.05%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.22%

-3.06%

-0.16%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.29%

1.07%

+0.22%

Volatility

ABNDX vs. BND - Volatility Comparison

American Funds The Bond Fund of America (ABNDX) and Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF (BND) have volatilities of 0.95% and 0.98%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ABNDXBNDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.95%

0.98%

-0.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.01%

2.90%

+0.11%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.79%

3.70%

+0.09%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.96%

6.03%

-0.07%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.89%

5.53%

-0.64%

ABNDX vs. BND - Expense Ratio Comparison

ABNDX has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than BND's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

ABNDX vs. BND - Dividend Comparison

ABNDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.83%, less than BND's 4.03% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ABNDX
American Funds The Bond Fund of America
3.83%4.13%4.30%3.24%2.17%1.62%5.03%3.49%2.38%1.84%1.77%2.00%
BND
Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF
3.69%3.86%3.67%3.09%2.60%2.12%2.38%2.72%2.81%2.54%2.51%2.57%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, ABNDX and BND move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

BND has higher volatility (0.98%) compared to ABNDX (0.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ABNDX dropped -18.18% vs BND's -18.58%.

BND currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.72 vs 0.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ABNDX and BND

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer