PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ABNDX vs. FTRFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ABNDX vs. FTRFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Funds The Bond Fund of America (ABNDX) and Federated Hermes Total Return Bond Fund (FTRFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ABNDX achieves a 0.10% return, which is significantly higher than FTRFX's -0.08% return. Over the past 10 years, ABNDX has underperformed FTRFX with an annualized return of 1.68%, while FTRFX has yielded a comparatively higher 1.85% annualized return.


ABNDX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.44%
YTD
0.10%
6M
0.00%
1Y
5.03%
3Y*
3.67%
5Y*
-0.20%
10Y*
1.68%

FTRFX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.57%
YTD
-0.08%
6M
0.30%
1Y
5.19%
3Y*
3.48%
5Y*
-0.23%
10Y*
1.85%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ABNDX vs. FTRFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ABNDX
American Funds The Bond Fund of America
0.10%7.16%1.17%4.34%-13.24%-1.33%10.72%7.83%-0.12%3.21%
FTRFX
Federated Hermes Total Return Bond Fund
-0.08%7.28%1.02%4.23%-13.31%-0.47%9.19%9.42%-1.14%4.10%

Correlation

The correlation between ABNDX and FTRFX is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.42

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.78

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.86

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.86

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 1996

0.80

Over the past year, the correlation between ABNDX and FTRFX has dropped to 0.42 - well below their long-term average of 0.80, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ABNDX vs. FTRFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ABNDX
ABNDX Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
ABNDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ABNDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
ABNDX Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
ABNDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
ABNDX Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank

FTRFX
FTRFX Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
FTRFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTRFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTRFX Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
FTRFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTRFX Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ABNDX vs. FTRFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Funds The Bond Fund of America (ABNDX) and Federated Hermes Total Return Bond Fund (FTRFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ABNDXFTRFXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.06

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.26

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.61

1.82

-0.21

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.83

5.64

-0.81

ABNDX vs. FTRFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ABNDX Sharpe Ratio is 1.29, which is comparable to the FTRFX Sharpe Ratio of 1.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ABNDX and FTRFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ABNDXFTRFXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.29

1.30

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.03

-0.04

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.34

0.39

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.00

1.01

-0.01

Drawdowns

ABNDX vs. FTRFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ABNDX drawdown since its inception was -18.18%, roughly equal to the maximum FTRFX drawdown of -17.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ABNDX and FTRFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ABNDXFTRFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.18%

-17.95%

-0.23%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.13%

-2.86%

-0.27%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.19%

-6.57%

+0.38%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.15%

-17.95%

-0.20%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-18.18%

-17.95%

-0.23%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.07%

-3.09%

+0.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.22%

-2.25%

-0.97%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.04%

0.92%

+0.12%

Volatility

ABNDX vs. FTRFX - Volatility Comparison

American Funds The Bond Fund of America (ABNDX) and Federated Hermes Total Return Bond Fund (FTRFX) have volatilities of 1.39% and 1.40%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ABNDXFTRFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.39%

1.40%

-0.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.81%

2.82%

-0.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.93%

4.02%

-0.09%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.95%

5.87%

+0.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.88%

4.78%

+0.10%

ABNDX vs. FTRFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

ABNDX has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is lower than FTRFX's 0.69% expense ratio.


Dividends

ABNDX vs. FTRFX - Dividend Comparison

ABNDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.14%, less than FTRFX's 4.25% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ABNDX
American Funds The Bond Fund of America
4.14%4.13%4.30%3.24%2.17%1.62%5.03%3.49%2.38%1.84%1.77%2.00%
FTRFX
Federated Hermes Total Return Bond Fund
4.25%4.22%3.48%2.95%2.25%3.17%4.36%3.08%3.19%2.91%3.33%3.23%

Frequently Asked Questions


ABNDX and FTRFX have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FTRFX has higher volatility (1.40%) compared to ABNDX (1.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ABNDX dropped -18.18% vs FTRFX's -17.95%.

FTRFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.30 vs 1.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ABNDX and FTRFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer