PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ABNB vs. KO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

ABNB vs. KO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Airbnb, Inc. (ABNB) and The Coca-Cola Company (KO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ABNB achieves a -2.53% return, which is significantly lower than KO's 18.99% return.


ABNB

1D
1.08%
1M
-0.52%
YTD
-2.53%
6M
3.03%
1Y
-4.70%
3Y*
1.93%
5Y*
-2.28%
10Y*

KO

1D
0.11%
1M
2.94%
YTD
18.99%
6M
17.96%
1Y
17.68%
3Y*
14.33%
5Y*
11.29%
10Y*
9.55%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ABNB vs. KO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
ABNB
Airbnb, Inc.
-2.53%3.28%-3.47%59.23%-48.65%13.41%0.55%
KO
The Coca-Cola Company
18.99%15.60%8.88%-4.43%10.61%11.37%2.83%

Correlation

The correlation between ABNB and KO is -0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.04

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.01

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.06

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 10, 2020

0.03

Fundamentals

Market Cap

ABNB:

$80.43B

KO:

$356.42B

EPS

ABNB:

$4.06

KO:

$3.18

PE Ratio

ABNB:

32.56

KO:

26.01

PEG Ratio

ABNB:

0.91

KO:

3.14

PS Ratio

ABNB:

6.48

KO:

7.23

PB Ratio

ABNB:

10.53

KO:

10.60

Total Revenue (TTM)

ABNB:

$12.65B

KO:

$49.28B

Gross Profit (TTM)

ABNB:

$10.49B

KO:

$30.43B

EBITDA (TTM)

ABNB:

$2.57B

KO:

$18.35B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ABNB vs. KO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ABNB
ABNB Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
ABNB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ABNB Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
ABNB Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
ABNB Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
ABNB Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank

KO
KO Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
KO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
KO Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
KO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
KO Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ABNB vs. KO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Airbnb, Inc. (ABNB) and The Coca-Cola Company (KO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ABNBKODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.22

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.76

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.00

1.19

-0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.22

2.26

-2.48

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.47

4.51

-4.98

ABNB vs. KO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ABNB Sharpe Ratio is -0.16, which is lower than the KO Sharpe Ratio of 1.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ABNB and KO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ABNB vs. KO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ABNB drawdown since its inception was -61.96%, smaller than the maximum KO drawdown of -68.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ABNB and KO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ABNBKODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-61.96%

-68.23%

+6.27%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-21.54%

-7.87%

-13.67%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-37.16%

-16.26%

-20.90%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-60.19%

-17.27%

-42.92%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-39.00%

-1.16%

-37.84%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-36.12%

-16.09%

-20.03%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.06%

3.98%

+6.08%

Volatility

ABNB vs. KO - Volatility Comparison

Airbnb, Inc. (ABNB) has a higher volatility of 7.64% compared to The Coca-Cola Company (KO) at 6.70%. This indicates that ABNB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ABNBKODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.64%

6.70%

+0.94%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

22.25%

12.87%

+9.38%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

29.05%

16.73%

+12.32%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

43.76%

16.18%

+27.58%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

45.93%

18.24%

+27.69%

Dividends

ABNB vs. KO - Dividend Comparison

ABNB has not paid dividends to shareholders, while KO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.49%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ABNB
Airbnb, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
KO
The Coca-Cola Company
2.49%2.92%3.12%3.12%2.77%2.84%2.99%2.89%3.29%3.23%3.38%3.07%

Financials

ABNB vs. KO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Airbnb, Inc. and The Coca-Cola Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.002.00B4.00B6.00B8.00B10.00B12.00B20222023202420252026
2.68B
12.47B
(ABNB) Total Revenue
(KO) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

ABNB vs. KO - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Airbnb, Inc. and The Coca-Cola Company over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

55.0%60.0%65.0%70.0%75.0%80.0%85.0%90.0%20222023202420252026
78.3%
63.0%
Portfolio components
ABNB - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Airbnb, Inc. reported a gross profit of 2.10B and revenue of 2.68B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 78.3%.

KO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Coca-Cola Company reported a gross profit of 7.85B and revenue of 12.47B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 63.0%.

ABNB - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Airbnb, Inc. reported an operating income of 86.00M and revenue of 2.68B, resulting in an operating margin of 3.2%.

KO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Coca-Cola Company reported an operating income of 4.36B and revenue of 12.47B, resulting in an operating margin of 35.0%.

ABNB - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Airbnb, Inc. reported a net income of 160.00M and revenue of 2.68B, resulting in a net margin of 6.0%.

KO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Coca-Cola Company reported a net income of 3.92B and revenue of 12.47B, resulting in a net margin of 31.5%.


Frequently Asked Questions


ABNB and KO have a correlation of -0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ABNB has higher volatility (7.64%) compared to KO (6.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ABNB dropped -61.96% vs KO's -68.23%.

KO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.06 vs -0.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ABNB and KO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer