ABLS vs. BITI

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

ABLS (Abacus FCF Small Cap Leaders ETF) and BITI (ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ABLS is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Abacus FCF Small Cap Leaders Index, while BITI is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the Bloomberg Bitcoin Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, ABLS returned 11.11% vs 64.61% for BITI. At a correlation of -0.35, they often move in opposite directions. ABLS charges 0.39%/yr vs 1.03%/yr for BITI.

Performance

ABLS vs. BITI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Abacus FCF Small Cap Leaders ETF (ABLS) and ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF (BITI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ABLS achieves a 14.80% return, which is significantly lower than BITI's 24.48% return.

ABLS

• 1D: -1.49%
• 1M: 5.12%
• 6M: 13.24%
• YTD: 14.80%
• 1Y: 11.11%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BITI

• 1D: 1.13%
• 1M: 1.49%
• 6M: 35.86%
• YTD: 24.48%
• 1Y: 64.61%
• 3Y*: -31.62%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ABLS vs. BITI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
ABLS Abacus FCF Small Cap Leaders ETF	14.80%	-8.72%
BITI ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF	24.48%	-0.50%

Correlation

The correlation between ABLS and BITI is -0.32, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.32
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 19, 2025	-0.35

Return for Risk

ABLS vs. BITI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ABLS

ABLS Risk / Return Rank: 21
ABLS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
ABLS Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
ABLS Omega Ratio Rank: 20
ABLS Calmar Ratio Rank: 20
ABLS Martin Ratio Rank: 21

BITI

BITI Risk / Return Rank: 52
BITI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 53
BITI Sortino Ratio Rank: 50
BITI Omega Ratio Rank: 46
BITI Calmar Ratio Rank: 64
BITI Martin Ratio Rank: 48

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ABLS vs. BITI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Abacus FCF Small Cap Leaders ETF (ABLS) and ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF (BITI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ABLS	BITI	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.62	1.47	-0.85
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.00	2.04	-1.04
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.11	1.25	-0.13
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.69	2.57	-1.88
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.93	6.38	-4.45

ABLS vs. BITI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ABLS Sharpe Ratio is 0.62, which is lower than the BITI Sharpe Ratio of 1.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ABLS and BITI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

ABLS vs. BITI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ABLS drawdown since its inception was -19.28%, smaller than the maximum BITI drawdown of -92.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ABLS and BITI.

Drawdown Indicators

	ABLS	BITI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-19.28%	-92.16%	+72.88%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-16.19%	-25.28%	+9.09%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-84.63%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.79%	-86.41%	+82.62%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.87%	-68.40%	+60.53%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.77%	10.16%	-4.39%

Volatility

ABLS vs. BITI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Abacus FCF Small Cap Leaders ETF (ABLS) is 5.25%, while ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF (BITI) has a volatility of 10.76%. This indicates that ABLS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BITI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ABLS	BITI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.25%	10.76%	-5.51%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.62%	34.28%	-20.66%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.04%	44.15%	-26.11%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.11%	52.24%	-31.13%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.11%	52.24%	-31.13%

ABLS vs. BITI - Expense Ratio Comparison

ABLS has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than BITI's 1.03% expense ratio.

Dividends

ABLS vs. BITI - Dividend Comparison

ABLS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.54%, less than BITI's 15.62% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
ABLS Abacus FCF Small Cap Leaders ETF	12.54%	14.04%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
BITI ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF	15.62%	1.60%	3.91%	3.33%	0.06%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ABLS and BITI in my portfolio?

ABLS and BITI have a correlation of -0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ABLS or BITI?

BITI has higher volatility (10.76%) compared to ABLS (5.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ABLS dropped -19.28% vs BITI's -92.16%.

Which ETF is better, ABLS or BITI?

On 1-year performance, BITI leads with 64.61% vs 11.11% for ABLS. On fees, ABLS is cheaper at 0.39% per year. On volatility, ABLS has been the lower-risk option at 5.25%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, ABLS or BITI?

Over the 1-year period, BITI has performed better with a 64.61% return vs 11.11%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, ABLS or BITI?

ABLS is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 1.03% for BITI.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ABLS or BITI?

BITI has the higher dividend yield at 15.62%, compared with 12.54% for ABLS.

What is the main difference between ABLS and BITI?

ABLS is categorized as Small Cap Blend Equities, while BITI is Cryptocurrency. ABLS tracks Abacus FCF Small Cap Leaders Index, while BITI tracks Bloomberg Bitcoin Index. They also come from different issuers: Abacus and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for ABLS and 1.03% for BITI.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BITI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.47 vs 0.62), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.