PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ABDN.L vs. CCH.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

ABDN.L vs. CCH.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Abrdn plc (ABDN.L) and Coca Cola HBC AG (CCH.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with ABDN.L having a 22.11% return and CCH.L slightly higher at 22.34%. Over the past 10 years, ABDN.L has underperformed CCH.L with an annualized return of 4.14%, while CCH.L has yielded a comparatively higher 16.35% annualized return.


ABDN.L

1D
2.45%
1M
8.32%
YTD
22.11%
6M
28.94%
1Y
36.15%
3Y*
13.25%
5Y*
4.89%
10Y*
4.14%

CCH.L

1D
1.28%
1M
10.23%
YTD
22.34%
6M
27.17%
1Y
18.75%
3Y*
28.32%
5Y*
15.57%
10Y*
16.35%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ABDN.L vs. CCH.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ABDN.L
Abrdn plc
22.11%57.94%-12.84%2.11%-14.88%-9.77%-5.36%38.83%-44.96%24.70%
CCH.L
Coca Cola HBC AG
22.34%43.91%22.14%20.08%-19.68%10.15%-4.69%11.09%3.27%39.03%

Correlation

The correlation between ABDN.L and CCH.L is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.11

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.19

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.29

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.28

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 29, 2013

0.31

The correlation between ABDN.L and CCH.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.11 (1 year) to 0.31 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

EPS

ABDN.L:

£0.70

CCH.L:

€4.84

PE Ratio

ABDN.L:

3.47

CCH.L:

10.98

PEG Ratio

ABDN.L:

0.00

CCH.L:

0.61

PS Ratio

ABDN.L:

0.69

CCH.L:

0.86

Total Revenue (TTM)

ABDN.L:

£3.20B

CCH.L:

€22.35B

Gross Profit (TTM)

ABDN.L:

£3.05B

CCH.L:

€8.14B

EBITDA (TTM)

ABDN.L:

£796.00M

CCH.L:

€3.00B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ABDN.L vs. CCH.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ABDN.L
ABDN.L Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
ABDN.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ABDN.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
ABDN.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
ABDN.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
ABDN.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank

CCH.L
CCH.L Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
CCH.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CCH.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
CCH.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
CCH.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
CCH.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ABDN.L vs. CCH.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Abrdn plc (ABDN.L) and Coca Cola HBC AG (CCH.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ABDN.LCCH.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.46

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.49

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.17

+0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.44

1.03

+1.40

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.21

2.15

+5.06

ABDN.L vs. CCH.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ABDN.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.28, which is higher than the CCH.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ABDN.L and CCH.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ABDN.L vs. CCH.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ABDN.L drawdown since its inception was -64.13%, which is greater than CCH.L's maximum drawdown of -48.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ABDN.L and CCH.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ABDN.LCCH.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-64.13%

-48.45%

-15.68%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.76%

-18.05%

+3.29%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-37.10%

-18.05%

-19.05%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-50.49%

-47.54%

-2.95%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-61.82%

-48.45%

-13.37%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-12.40%

-3.09%

-9.31%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-28.92%

-14.55%

-14.37%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.00%

8.69%

-3.69%

Volatility

ABDN.L vs. CCH.L - Volatility Comparison

Abrdn plc (ABDN.L) has a higher volatility of 8.30% compared to Coca Cola HBC AG (CCH.L) at 5.17%. This indicates that ABDN.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CCH.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ABDN.LCCH.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.30%

5.17%

+3.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

23.94%

16.79%

+7.15%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

28.11%

22.83%

+5.28%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

32.63%

23.89%

+8.74%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

33.88%

26.20%

+7.68%

Dividends

ABDN.L vs. CCH.L - Dividend Comparison

ABDN.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.03%, more than CCH.L's 2.26% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ABDN.L
Abrdn plc
6.03%7.10%10.34%8.17%7.71%6.06%7.68%6.58%10.54%5.33%5.78%5.12%
CCH.L
Coca Cola HBC AG
2.26%2.33%2.96%2.94%3.60%2.50%2.35%6.99%1.95%1.60%1.88%1.76%

Financials

ABDN.L vs. CCH.L - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Abrdn plc and Coca Cola HBC AG. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


1.00B2.00B3.00B4.00B5.00B6.00B20212022202320242025
1.04B
5.98B
(ABDN.L) Total Revenue
(CCH.L) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. ABDN.L values in GBP, CCH.L values in EUR

Frequently Asked Questions


ABDN.L and CCH.L have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ABDN.L and CCH.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer