ABCS vs. SIXL

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

ABCS (Alpha Blue Capital US Small-Mid Cap Dynamic ETF) and SIXL (ETC 6 Meridian Low Beta Equity Strategy ETF) are both Mid Cap Blend Equities funds. ABCS is passively managed, while SIXL is actively managed. Over the past year, ABCS returned 16.85% vs 3.64% for SIXL. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ABCS charges 0.27%/yr vs 0.47%/yr for SIXL.

Performance

ABCS vs. SIXL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Alpha Blue Capital US Small-Mid Cap Dynamic ETF (ABCS) and ETC 6 Meridian Low Beta Equity Strategy ETF (SIXL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ABCS achieves a 6.97% return, which is significantly higher than SIXL's 3.41% return.

ABCS

• 1D: -0.49%
• 1M: 2.28%
• YTD: 6.97%
• 6M: 7.94%
• 1Y: 16.85%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

SIXL

• 1D: -0.16%
• 1M: -2.82%
• YTD: 3.41%
• 6M: 2.41%
• 1Y: 3.64%
• 3Y*: 7.60%
• 5Y*: 3.45%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ABCS vs. SIXL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
ABCS Alpha Blue Capital US Small-Mid Cap Dynamic ETF	6.97%	7.95%	14.47%	1.97%
SIXL ETC 6 Meridian Low Beta Equity Strategy ETF	3.41%	-0.61%	14.13%	1.49%

Correlation

The correlation between ABCS and SIXL is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.67
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 21, 2023	0.76

The correlation between ABCS and SIXL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.67 to 0.76 - a consistent structural relationship.

ABCS vs. SIXL - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	ABCS	SIXL
Financial Services	21.3%	15.2%
Healthcare	14.7%	14.5%
Technology	14.0%	2.4%
Consumer Cyclical	13.7%	6.8%
Industrials	10.9%	6.4%
Energy	6.5%	2.1%
Real Estate	5.0%	13.6%
Consumer Defensive	4.8%	17.0%
Utilities	3.5%	17.3%
Basic Materials	3.5%	2.2%
Communication Services	2.0%	2.6%

Return for Risk

ABCS vs. SIXL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ABCS

ABCS Risk / Return Rank: 38
ABCS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 35
ABCS Sortino Ratio Rank: 37
ABCS Omega Ratio Rank: 34
ABCS Calmar Ratio Rank: 42
ABCS Martin Ratio Rank: 40

SIXL

SIXL Risk / Return Rank: 15
SIXL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 15
SIXL Sortino Ratio Rank: 14
SIXL Omega Ratio Rank: 14
SIXL Calmar Ratio Rank: 16
SIXL Martin Ratio Rank: 17

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ABCS vs. SIXL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alpha Blue Capital US Small-Mid Cap Dynamic ETF (ABCS) and ETC 6 Meridian Low Beta Equity Strategy ETF (SIXL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ABCS	SIXL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.25	0.38	+0.86
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.89	0.60	+1.29
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.22	1.07	+0.15
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.03	0.56	+1.47
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.39	1.58	+4.81
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ABCS vs. SIXL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ABCS Sharpe Ratio is 1.25, which is higher than the SIXL Sharpe Ratio of 0.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ABCS and SIXL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ABCS	SIXL	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.25	0.38	+0.86
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.29	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.76	0.63	+0.14

Drawdowns

ABCS vs. SIXL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ABCS drawdown since its inception was -20.52%, which is greater than SIXL's maximum drawdown of -16.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ABCS and SIXL.

Drawdown Indicators

	ABCS	SIXL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-20.52%	-16.08%	-4.44%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.33%	-6.52%	-1.81%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-11.65%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-16.08%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.49%	-6.04%	+5.55%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.53%	-4.57%	+1.04%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.64%	2.31%	+0.33%

Volatility

ABCS vs. SIXL - Volatility Comparison

Alpha Blue Capital US Small-Mid Cap Dynamic ETF (ABCS) has a higher volatility of 2.66% compared to ETC 6 Meridian Low Beta Equity Strategy ETF (SIXL) at 2.36%. This indicates that ABCS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SIXL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ABCS	SIXL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.66%	2.36%	+0.30%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.27%	6.61%	+2.66%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.60%	9.50%	+4.10%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.09%	12.14%	+4.95%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.09%	12.55%	+4.54%

ABCS vs. SIXL - Expense Ratio Comparison

ABCS has a 0.27% expense ratio, which is lower than SIXL's 0.47% expense ratio.

Dividends

ABCS vs. SIXL - Dividend Comparison

ABCS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.26%, less than SIXL's 2.31% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
ABCS Alpha Blue Capital US Small-Mid Cap Dynamic ETF	1.26%	1.37%	1.39%	0.02%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SIXL ETC 6 Meridian Low Beta Equity Strategy ETF	2.31%	2.31%	1.28%	1.48%	1.45%	0.67%	0.40%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ABCS and SIXL in my portfolio?

ABCS and SIXL have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ABCS or SIXL?

ABCS has higher volatility (2.66%) compared to SIXL (2.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ABCS dropped -20.52% vs SIXL's -16.08%.

Which ETF is better, ABCS or SIXL?

On 1-year performance, ABCS leads with 16.85% vs 3.64% for SIXL. On fees, ABCS is cheaper at 0.27% per year. On volatility, SIXL has been the lower-risk option at 2.36%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, ABCS or SIXL?

Over the 1-year period, ABCS has performed better with a 16.85% return vs 3.64%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, ABCS or SIXL?

ABCS is cheaper with a 0.27% expense ratio, compared with 0.47% for SIXL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ABCS or SIXL?

SIXL has the higher dividend yield at 2.31%, compared with 1.26% for ABCS.

What is the main difference between ABCS and SIXL?

They also come from different issuers: Alpha Architect and Exchange Traded Concepts. Their fees differ too: 0.27% for ABCS and 0.47% for SIXL.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ABCS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.25 vs 0.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.