ABCS vs. OPTZ
ABCS (Alpha Blue Capital US Small-Mid Cap Dynamic ETF) and OPTZ (Optimize Strategy Index ETF) are both Mid Cap Blend Equities funds - ABCS tracks the BNY Mellon ABC Index while OPTZ tracks the Optimize Strategy Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, ABCS returned 16.85% vs 61.30% for OPTZ. A 0.80 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ABCS charges 0.27%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for OPTZ.
Performance
ABCS vs. OPTZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ABCS achieves a 6.97% return, which is significantly lower than OPTZ's 31.51% return.
ABCS
- 1D
- -0.49%
- 1M
- 2.28%
- YTD
- 6.97%
- 6M
- 7.94%
- 1Y
- 16.85%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
OPTZ
- 1D
- 0.36%
- 1M
- 12.33%
- YTD
- 31.51%
- 6M
- 32.28%
- 1Y
- 61.30%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ABCS vs. OPTZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
ABCS Alpha Blue Capital US Small-Mid Cap Dynamic ETF | 6.97% | 7.95% | 11.15% |
OPTZ Optimize Strategy Index ETF | 31.51% | 22.83% | 16.81% |
Correlation
The correlation between ABCS and OPTZ is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 24, 2024 | 0.80 |
The correlation between ABCS and OPTZ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.74 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.
ABCS vs. OPTZ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ABCS
OPTZ
Financial Services
Healthcare
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Energy
Real Estate
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Financial Services
ABCS
OPTZ
Healthcare
ABCS
OPTZ
Technology
ABCS
OPTZ
Consumer Cyclical
ABCS
OPTZ
Industrials
ABCS
OPTZ
Energy
ABCS
OPTZ
Real Estate
ABCS
OPTZ
Consumer Defensive
ABCS
OPTZ
Utilities
ABCS
OPTZ
Basic Materials
ABCS
OPTZ
Communication Services
ABCS
OPTZ
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ABCS vs. OPTZ — Risk / Return Rank
ABCS
OPTZ
ABCS vs. OPTZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alpha Blue Capital US Small-Mid Cap Dynamic ETF (ABCS) and Optimize Strategy Index ETF (OPTZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ABCS | OPTZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.17 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.60 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.57 | -0.35 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.03 | 5.80 | -3.76 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.39 | 26.36 | -19.97 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ABCS | OPTZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.25 | 3.41 | -2.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.76 | 1.71 | -0.95 |
Drawdowns
ABCS vs. OPTZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ABCS drawdown since its inception was -20.52%, smaller than the maximum OPTZ drawdown of -25.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ABCS and OPTZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ABCS | OPTZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.52% | -25.75% | +5.23% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.33% | -10.63% | +2.30% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.49% | 0.00% | -0.49% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.53% | -3.39% | -0.14% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.64% | 2.33% | +0.31% |
Volatility
ABCS vs. OPTZ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Alpha Blue Capital US Small-Mid Cap Dynamic ETF (ABCS) is 2.66%, while Optimize Strategy Index ETF (OPTZ) has a volatility of 6.09%. This indicates that ABCS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than OPTZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ABCS | OPTZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.66% | 6.09% | -3.43% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.27% | 13.52% | -4.25% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.60% | 18.09% | -4.49% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.09% | 20.66% | -3.57% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.09% | 20.66% | -3.57% |
ABCS vs. OPTZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
ABCS has a 0.27% expense ratio, which is higher than OPTZ's 0.25% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
ABCS vs. OPTZ - Dividend Comparison
ABCS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.26%, more than OPTZ's 0.44% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
ABCS Alpha Blue Capital US Small-Mid Cap Dynamic ETF | 1.26% | 1.37% | 1.39% | 0.02% |
OPTZ Optimize Strategy Index ETF | 0.44% | 0.58% | 0.32% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ABCS and OPTZ have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
OPTZ has higher volatility (6.09%) compared to ABCS (2.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ABCS dropped -20.52% vs OPTZ's -25.75%.
On 1-year performance, OPTZ leads with 61.30% vs 16.85% for ABCS. On fees, OPTZ is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, ABCS has been the lower-risk option at 2.66%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, OPTZ has performed better with a 61.30% return vs 16.85%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
OPTZ is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.27% for ABCS.
ABCS has the higher dividend yield at 1.26%, compared with 0.44% for OPTZ.
ABCS tracks BNY Mellon ABC Index, while OPTZ tracks Optimize Strategy Index. They also come from different issuers: Alpha Architect and Optimize. Their fees differ too: 0.27% for ABCS and 0.25% for OPTZ.
OPTZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.41 vs 1.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ABCS and OPTZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer