PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ABCL vs. SCHB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ABCL vs. SCHB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AbCellera Biologics Inc. (ABCL) and Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF (SCHB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ABCL achieves a 80.12% return, which is significantly higher than SCHB's 11.27% return.


ABCL

1D
-8.61%
1M
21.02%
6M
47.37%
YTD
80.12%
1Y
51.72%
3Y*
-6.56%
5Y*
-18.31%
10Y*

SCHB

1D
-0.45%
1M
0.37%
6M
9.11%
YTD
11.27%
1Y
21.89%
3Y*
19.71%
5Y*
12.36%
10Y*
14.65%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ABCL vs. SCHB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
ABCL
AbCellera Biologics Inc.
80.12%16.72%-48.69%-43.63%-29.16%-64.46%-34.03%
SCHB
Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF
11.27%16.94%23.93%26.16%-19.46%25.84%2.45%

Correlation

The correlation between ABCL and SCHB is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.46

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.42

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.42

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 11, 2020

0.39

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ABCL vs. SCHB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ABCL
ABCL Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
ABCL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ABCL Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
ABCL Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
ABCL Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
ABCL Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank

SCHB
SCHB Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
SCHB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHB Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHB Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHB Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHB Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ABCL vs. SCHB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AbCellera Biologics Inc. (ABCL) and Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF (SCHB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ABCLSCHBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.06

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.89

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.31

-0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.95

2.47

-1.52

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.71

10.75

-9.04

ABCL vs. SCHB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ABCL Sharpe Ratio is 0.66, which is lower than the SCHB Sharpe Ratio of 1.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ABCL and SCHB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ABCL vs. SCHB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ABCL drawdown since its inception was -96.84%, which is greater than SCHB's maximum drawdown of -35.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ABCL and SCHB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ABCLSCHBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-96.84%

-35.27%

-61.57%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-54.94%

-8.91%

-46.03%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-75.72%

-19.34%

-56.38%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-90.96%

-25.41%

-65.55%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.27%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-89.90%

-0.73%

-89.17%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-84.21%

-4.10%

-80.11%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

30.35%

2.04%

+28.31%

Volatility

ABCL vs. SCHB - Volatility Comparison

AbCellera Biologics Inc. (ABCL) has a higher volatility of 27.37% compared to Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF (SCHB) at 3.32%. This indicates that ABCL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ABCLSCHBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

27.37%

3.32%

+24.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

58.10%

10.17%

+47.93%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

79.15%

12.83%

+66.32%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

67.54%

17.35%

+50.19%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

70.70%

18.30%

+52.40%

Dividends

ABCL vs. SCHB - Dividend Comparison

ABCL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SCHB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.04%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ABCL
AbCellera Biologics Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SCHB
Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF
1.04%1.11%1.24%1.40%1.61%1.21%1.63%1.80%2.00%1.65%1.86%2.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


ABCL and SCHB have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ABCL has higher volatility (27.37%) compared to SCHB (3.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ABCL dropped -96.84% vs SCHB's -35.27%.

SCHB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.71 vs 0.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ABCL and SCHB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer