ABCH.DE vs. SLNC.DE
ABCH.DE (21Shares Bitcoin Cash ETP) and SLNC.DE (CoinShares FTX Physical Staked Solana EUR) are both Cryptocurrency funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, ABCH.DE returned 23.63%/yr vs 49.86%/yr for SLNC.DE. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ABCH.DE charges 2.50%/yr vs 0.00%/yr for SLNC.DE.
Performance
ABCH.DE vs. SLNC.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ABCH.DE achieves a -58.78% return, which is significantly lower than SLNC.DE's -42.42% return.
ABCH.DE
- 1D
- 0.47%
- 1M
- -45.54%
- YTD
- -58.78%
- 6M
- -57.68%
- 1Y
- -41.68%
- 3Y*
- 23.63%
- 5Y*
- -19.30%
- 10Y*
- —
SLNC.DE
- 1D
- -5.24%
- 1M
- -17.72%
- YTD
- -42.42%
- 6M
- -50.30%
- 1Y
- -55.13%
- 3Y*
- 49.86%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ABCH.DE vs. SLNC.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ABCH.DE 21Shares Bitcoin Cash ETP | -58.78% | 16.28% | 73.28% | 161.37% | -73.20% |
SLNC.DE CoinShares FTX Physical Staked Solana EUR | -42.42% | -40.96% | 94.71% | 1,027.77% | -89.44% |
Correlation
The correlation between ABCH.DE and SLNC.DE is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 24, 2022 | 0.62 |
The correlation between ABCH.DE and SLNC.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.58 to 0.62 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ABCH.DE vs. SLNC.DE — Risk / Return Rank
ABCH.DE
SLNC.DE
ABCH.DE vs. SLNC.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for 21Shares Bitcoin Cash ETP (ABCH.DE) and CoinShares FTX Physical Staked Solana EUR (SLNC.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ABCH.DE | SLNC.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.18 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.50 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.91 | 0.87 | +0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.67 | -0.78 | +0.10 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.98 | -1.25 | -0.74 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ABCH.DE | SLNC.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.67 | -0.85 | +0.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.23 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.18 | -0.06 | -0.12 |
Drawdowns
ABCH.DE vs. SLNC.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ABCH.DE drawdown since its inception was -92.87%, roughly equal to the maximum SLNC.DE drawdown of -92.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ABCH.DE and SLNC.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ABCH.DE | SLNC.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -92.87% | -92.51% | -0.36% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -61.98% | -70.93% | +8.95% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -68.05% | -75.00% | +6.95% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -86.84% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -84.51% | -75.00% | -9.51% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -73.01% | -50.99% | -22.02% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 20.98% | 44.24% | -23.26% |
Volatility
ABCH.DE vs. SLNC.DE - Volatility Comparison
21Shares Bitcoin Cash ETP (ABCH.DE) has a higher volatility of 25.19% compared to CoinShares FTX Physical Staked Solana EUR (SLNC.DE) at 14.87%. This indicates that ABCH.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SLNC.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ABCH.DE | SLNC.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 25.19% | 14.87% | +10.32% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 44.40% | 44.95% | -0.55% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 61.97% | 65.09% | -3.12% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 82.28% | 92.13% | -9.85% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 85.36% | 92.13% | -6.77% |
ABCH.DE vs. SLNC.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
ABCH.DE has a 2.50% expense ratio, which is higher than SLNC.DE's 0.00% expense ratio.
Dividends
ABCH.DE vs. SLNC.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither ABCH.DE nor SLNC.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
ABCH.DE and SLNC.DE have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SLNC.DE is cheaper at 0.00% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SLNC.DE is cheaper with a 0.00% expense ratio, compared with 2.50% for ABCH.DE.
They also come from different issuers: 21Shares and CoinShares. Their fees differ too: 2.50% for ABCH.DE and 0.00% for SLNC.DE.
Find the right allocation for ABCH.DE and SLNC.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer