ABBV vs. XLK
ABBV (AbbVie Inc.) is a stock, while XLK (State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF) is Technology Equities fund tracking the S&P Technology Select Sector Daily Capped 35/20 Index. Over the past 10 years, ABBV returned 19.10%/yr vs 25.19%/yr for XLK. At a 0.29 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
ABBV vs. XLK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ABBV achieves a 1.30% return, which is significantly lower than XLK's 28.52% return. Over the past 10 years, ABBV has underperformed XLK with an annualized return of 19.10%, while XLK has yielded a comparatively higher 25.19% annualized return.
ABBV
- 1D
- 1.32%
- 1M
- 9.22%
- YTD
- 1.30%
- 6M
- 3.65%
- 1Y
- 22.21%
- 3Y*
- 22.39%
- 5Y*
- 18.94%
- 10Y*
- 19.10%
XLK
- 1D
- 0.87%
- 1M
- 4.50%
- YTD
- 28.52%
- 6M
- 28.96%
- 1Y
- 53.24%
- 3Y*
- 30.28%
- 5Y*
- 22.02%
- 10Y*
- 25.19%
ABBV vs. XLK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ABBV AbbVie Inc. | 1.30% | 33.08% | 18.86% | -0.23% | 24.01% | 32.43% | 27.72% | 1.47% | -0.96% | 60.07% |
XLK State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF | 28.52% | 24.61% | 21.63% | 56.02% | -27.73% | 34.74% | 43.62% | 49.86% | -1.68% | 34.26% |
Correlation
The correlation between ABBV and XLK is -0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.09 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.01 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2013 | 0.29 |
The correlation between ABBV and XLK shifts across timeframes, from -0.09 (1 year) to 0.29 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ABBV vs. XLK — Risk / Return Rank
ABBV
XLK
ABBV vs. XLK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AbbVie Inc. (ABBV) and State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ABBV | XLK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.46 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.50 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.39 | -0.22 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.29 | 3.36 | -2.07 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.88 | 10.85 | -7.97 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ABBV vs. XLK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ABBV drawdown since its inception was -45.09%, smaller than the maximum XLK drawdown of -82.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ABBV and XLK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ABBV | XLK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -45.09% | -82.05% | +36.96% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.32% | -15.92% | -1.40% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.74% | -25.66% | +4.92% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.92% | -33.56% | +11.64% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.09% | -33.56% | -11.53% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.60% | -6.77% | +2.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.71% | -34.93% | +24.22% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.75% | 4.92% | +2.83% |
Volatility
ABBV vs. XLK - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for AbbVie Inc. (ABBV) is 6.10%, while State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK) has a volatility of 10.86%. This indicates that ABBV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XLK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ABBV | XLK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.10% | 10.86% | -4.76% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.85% | 18.92% | -1.07% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.31% | 22.55% | +1.76% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.89% | 25.18% | -2.29% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.73% | 24.64% | +1.09% |
Dividends
ABBV vs. XLK - Dividend Comparison
ABBV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.96%, more than XLK's 0.41% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ABBV AbbVie Inc. | 2.96% | 2.87% | 3.49% | 3.82% | 3.49% | 3.84% | 4.41% | 4.83% | 3.89% | 2.65% | 3.64% | 3.41% |
XLK State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF | 0.41% | 0.54% | 0.66% | 0.76% | 1.04% | 0.65% | 0.92% | 1.16% | 1.60% | 1.37% | 1.74% | 1.79% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ABBV and XLK have a correlation of -0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XLK has higher volatility (10.86%) compared to ABBV (6.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ABBV dropped -45.09% vs XLK's -82.05%.
XLK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.37 vs 0.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ABBV and XLK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer