ABBV vs. T
ABBV (AbbVie Inc.) and T (AT&T Inc.) are both stocks. ABBV operates in Drug Manufacturers - General (Healthcare), while T operates in Telecom Services (Communication Services). Over the past 10 years, ABBV returned 19.10%/yr vs 3.33%/yr for T. At a 0.28 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
ABBV vs. T - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ABBV achieves a 1.30% return, which is significantly higher than T's -2.96% return. Over the past 10 years, ABBV has outperformed T with an annualized return of 19.10%, while T has yielded a comparatively lower 3.33% annualized return.
ABBV
- 1D
- 1.32%
- 1M
- 9.22%
- YTD
- 1.30%
- 6M
- 3.65%
- 1Y
- 22.21%
- 3Y*
- 22.39%
- 5Y*
- 18.94%
- 10Y*
- 19.10%
T
- 1D
- 2.52%
- 1M
- -4.69%
- YTD
- -2.96%
- 6M
- -1.93%
- 1Y
- -12.96%
- 3Y*
- 20.58%
- 5Y*
- 7.38%
- 10Y*
- 3.33%
ABBV vs. T - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ABBV AbbVie Inc. | 1.30% | 33.08% | 18.86% | -0.23% | 24.01% | 32.43% | 27.72% | 1.47% | -0.96% | 60.07% |
T AT&T Inc. | -2.96% | 13.97% | 44.08% | -2.74% | 5.76% | -8.09% | -21.37% | 45.55% | -22.25% | -4.01% |
Correlation
The correlation between ABBV and T is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2013 | 0.28 |
Fundamentals
ABBV:
$2.05
T:
$3.04
ABBV:
110.96
T:
7.74
ABBV:
6.43
T:
1.35
ABBV:
$62.82B
T:
$125.65B
ABBV:
$46.15B
T:
$105.41B
ABBV:
$17.96B
T:
$54.70B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ABBV vs. T — Risk / Return Rank
ABBV
T
ABBV vs. T - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AbbVie Inc. (ABBV) and AT&T Inc. (T). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ABBV | T | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.51 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.14 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 0.92 | +0.26 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.29 | -0.59 | +1.88 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.88 | -1.22 | +4.10 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ABBV vs. T - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ABBV drawdown since its inception was -45.09%, smaller than the maximum T drawdown of -64.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ABBV and T.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ABBV | T | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -45.09% | -64.15% | +19.06% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.32% | -21.87% | +4.55% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.74% | -21.87% | +1.13% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.92% | -32.01% | +10.09% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.09% | -42.35% | -2.74% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.60% | -18.12% | +13.52% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.71% | -15.72% | +5.01% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.75% | 10.64% | -2.89% |
Volatility
ABBV vs. T - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for AbbVie Inc. (ABBV) is 6.10%, while AT&T Inc. (T) has a volatility of 8.21%. This indicates that ABBV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than T based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ABBV | T | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.10% | 8.21% | -2.11% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.85% | 17.80% | +0.05% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.31% | 22.13% | +2.18% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.89% | 24.01% | -1.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.73% | 23.73% | +2.00% |
Dividends
ABBV vs. T - Dividend Comparison
ABBV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.96%, less than T's 4.71% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ABBV AbbVie Inc. | 2.96% | 2.87% | 3.49% | 3.82% | 3.49% | 3.84% | 4.41% | 4.83% | 3.89% | 2.65% | 3.64% | 3.41% |
T AT&T Inc. | 4.71% | 4.47% | 4.87% | 6.62% | 6.66% | 8.46% | 7.23% | 5.22% | 7.01% | 5.04% | 4.51% | 5.46% |
Financials
ABBV vs. T - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between AbbVie Inc. and AT&T Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
ABBV and T have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
T has higher volatility (8.21%) compared to ABBV (6.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ABBV dropped -45.09% vs T's -64.15%.
ABBV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.92 vs -0.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ABBV and T
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer