PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ABBV vs. NWN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

ABBV vs. NWN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AbbVie Inc. (ABBV) and Northwest Natural Holding Company (NWN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ABBV achieves a 12.42% return, which is significantly higher than NWN's 7.82% return. Over the past 10 years, ABBV has outperformed NWN with an annualized return of 18.94%, while NWN has yielded a comparatively lower 0.95% annualized return.


ABBV

1D
-2.51%
1M
0.66%
6M
14.27%
YTD
12.42%
1Y
36.88%
3Y*
23.28%
5Y*
20.99%
10Y*
18.94%
ALL TIME*
20.35%

NWN

1D
-1.25%
1M
1.39%
6M
7.11%
YTD
7.82%
1Y
27.60%
3Y*
9.99%
5Y*
3.12%
10Y*
0.95%
ALL TIME*
7.67%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$1.40B$1.53B$1.60B
$10.16M$10.61M$13.82M

ABBV vs. NWN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ABBV
AbbVie Inc.
12.42%33.08%18.86%-0.23%24.01%32.43%27.72%1.47%-0.96%60.07%
NWN
Northwest Natural Holding Company
7.82%23.75%6.77%-14.45%1.49%10.26%-35.52%25.46%4.48%2.82%

Correlation

The correlation between ABBV and NWN is 0.24, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.24

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.24

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.25

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.20

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2013

0.20

Fundamentals

Market Cap

ABBV:

$443.24B

NWN:

$2.06B

EPS

ABBV:

$2.05

NWN:

$4.49

PE Ratio

ABBV:

122.29

NWN:

10.90

PS Ratio

ABBV:

7.08

NWN:

1.04

Total Revenue (TTM)

ABBV:

$62.82B

NWN:

$1.29B

Gross Profit (TTM)

ABBV:

$46.15B

NWN:

$288.00M

EBITDA (TTM)

ABBV:

$17.96B

NWN:

$426.96M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ABBV vs. NWN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

ABBV
ABBV Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
ABBV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ABBV Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
ABBV Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
ABBV Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
ABBV Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

NWN
NWN Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
NWN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NWN Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
NWN Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
NWN Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
NWN Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

ABBV vs. NWN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AbbVie Inc. (ABBV) and Northwest Natural Holding Company (NWN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ABBVNWNDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.05

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.26

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.25

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.14

2.06

+0.08

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.73

5.01

-0.27

ABBV vs. NWN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ABBV Sharpe Ratio is 1.42, which is comparable to the NWN Sharpe Ratio of 1.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ABBV and NWN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ABBV vs. NWN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ABBV drawdown since its inception was -45.09%, roughly equal to the maximum NWN drawdown of -46.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ABBV and NWN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ABBVNWNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-45.09%

-46.27%

+1.18%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.32%

-13.46%

-3.86%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.74%

-15.14%

-5.60%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.92%

-32.09%

+10.17%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.09%

-46.27%

+1.18%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.69%

-16.22%

+11.53%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.64%

-12.15%

+1.51%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.81%

5.53%

+2.28%

Volatility

ABBV vs. NWN - Volatility Comparison

AbbVie Inc. (ABBV) has a higher volatility of 8.35% compared to Northwest Natural Holding Company (NWN) at 6.67%. This indicates that ABBV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NWN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ABBVNWNDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.35%

6.67%

+1.68%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.56%

16.71%

+2.85%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

26.14%

20.31%

+5.83%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.46%

22.83%

+0.63%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.92%

28.19%

-2.27%

Dividends

ABBV vs. NWN - Dividend Comparison

ABBV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.72%, less than NWN's 4.03% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ABBV
AbbVie Inc.
2.72%2.87%3.49%3.82%3.49%3.84%4.41%4.83%3.89%2.65%3.64%3.41%
NWN
Northwest Natural Holding Company
4.03%4.20%4.94%4.99%4.06%3.94%4.16%2.58%3.13%3.16%3.13%3.68%

Financials

ABBV vs. NWN - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between AbbVie Inc. and Northwest Natural Holding Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

ABBV vs. NWN - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between AbbVie Inc. and Northwest Natural Holding Company over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

ABBV - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, AbbVie Inc. reported a gross profit of 12.53B and revenue of 15.00B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 83.5%.

NWN - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Northwest Natural Holding Company reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 490.40M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

ABBV - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, AbbVie Inc. reported an operating income of 4.73B and revenue of 15.00B, resulting in an operating margin of 31.6%.

NWN - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Northwest Natural Holding Company reported an operating income of 162.87M and revenue of 490.40M, resulting in an operating margin of 33.2%.

ABBV - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, AbbVie Inc. reported a net income of 699.00M and revenue of 15.00B, resulting in a net margin of 4.7%.

NWN - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Northwest Natural Holding Company reported a net income of 97.49M and revenue of 490.40M, resulting in a net margin of 19.9%.


Frequently Asked Questions


ABBV and NWN have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ABBV has higher volatility (8.35%) compared to NWN (6.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ABBV dropped -45.09% vs NWN's -46.27%.

ABBV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.42 vs 1.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ABBV and NWN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer