ABBV vs. MSA
ABBV (AbbVie Inc.) and MSA (MSA Safety Incorporated) are both stocks. ABBV operates in Drug Manufacturers - General (Healthcare), while MSA operates in Security & Protection Services (Industrials). Over the past 10 years, ABBV returned 18.63%/yr vs 13.54%/yr for MSA. At a 0.26 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
ABBV vs. MSA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ABBV achieves a -0.77% return, which is significantly lower than MSA's -0.18% return. Over the past 10 years, ABBV has outperformed MSA with an annualized return of 18.63%, while MSA has yielded a comparatively lower 13.54% annualized return.
ABBV
- 1D
- -1.83%
- 1M
- 10.68%
- YTD
- -0.77%
- 6M
- 1.62%
- 1Y
- 21.34%
- 3Y*
- 21.59%
- 5Y*
- 18.74%
- 10Y*
- 18.63%
MSA
- 1D
- -1.46%
- 1M
- -6.18%
- YTD
- -0.18%
- 6M
- -0.35%
- 1Y
- -2.56%
- 3Y*
- 2.22%
- 5Y*
- 0.24%
- 10Y*
- 13.54%
ABBV vs. MSA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ABBV AbbVie Inc. | -0.77% | 33.08% | 18.86% | -0.23% | 24.01% | 32.43% | 27.72% | 1.47% | -0.96% | 60.07% |
MSA MSA Safety Incorporated | -0.18% | -2.14% | -0.71% | 18.52% | -3.15% | 2.14% | 19.79% | 36.10% | 23.61% | 13.97% |
Correlation
The correlation between ABBV and MSA is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2013 | 0.26 |
The correlation between ABBV and MSA shifts across timeframes, from 0.15 (3 years) to 0.26 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
ABBV:
$2.05
MSA:
$9.85
ABBV:
108.68
MSA:
16.13
ABBV:
6.30
MSA:
2.45
ABBV:
$62.82B
MSA:
$1.92B
ABBV:
$46.15B
MSA:
$897.30M
ABBV:
$17.96B
MSA:
$465.55M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ABBV vs. MSA — Risk / Return Rank
ABBV
MSA
ABBV vs. MSA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AbbVie Inc. (ABBV) and MSA Safety Incorporated (MSA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ABBV | MSA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.99 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.36 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.00 | +0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.24 | -0.12 | +1.36 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.77 | -0.26 | +3.03 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ABBV | MSA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.88 | -0.11 | +0.99 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.82 | 0.01 | +0.81 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.73 | 0.47 | +0.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.74 | 0.34 | +0.40 |
Drawdowns
ABBV vs. MSA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ABBV drawdown since its inception was -45.09%, smaller than the maximum MSA drawdown of -70.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ABBV and MSA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ABBV | MSA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -45.09% | -70.32% | +25.23% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.32% | -21.29% | +3.97% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.74% | -34.28% | +13.54% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.92% | -34.28% | +12.36% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.09% | -38.39% | -6.70% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.55% | -21.29% | +14.74% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.72% | -17.44% | +6.72% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.72% | 9.79% | -2.07% |
Volatility
ABBV vs. MSA - Volatility Comparison
AbbVie Inc. (ABBV) and MSA Safety Incorporated (MSA) have volatilities of 6.39% and 6.61%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ABBV | MSA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.39% | 6.61% | -0.22% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.89% | 17.65% | +0.24% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.33% | 23.93% | +0.40% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.91% | 24.71% | -1.80% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.74% | 28.78% | -3.04% |
Dividends
ABBV vs. MSA - Dividend Comparison
ABBV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.02%, more than MSA's 1.34% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ABBV AbbVie Inc. | 3.02% | 2.87% | 3.49% | 3.82% | 3.49% | 3.84% | 4.41% | 4.83% | 3.89% | 2.65% | 3.64% | 3.41% |
MSA MSA Safety Incorporated | 1.34% | 1.31% | 1.21% | 1.11% | 1.26% | 1.16% | 1.14% | 1.30% | 1.58% | 1.78% | 1.89% | 2.92% |
Financials
ABBV vs. MSA - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between AbbVie Inc. and MSA Safety Incorporated. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
ABBV vs. MSA - Profitability Comparison
ABBV - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, AbbVie Inc. reported a gross profit of 12.53B and revenue of 15.00B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 83.5%.
MSA - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, MSA Safety Incorporated reported a gross profit of 219.58M and revenue of 463.63M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 47.4%.
ABBV - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, AbbVie Inc. reported an operating income of 4.73B and revenue of 15.00B, resulting in an operating margin of 31.6%.
MSA - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, MSA Safety Incorporated reported an operating income of 93.01M and revenue of 463.63M, resulting in an operating margin of 20.1%.
ABBV - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, AbbVie Inc. reported a net income of 699.00M and revenue of 15.00B, resulting in a net margin of 4.7%.
MSA - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, MSA Safety Incorporated reported a net income of 71.27M and revenue of 463.63M, resulting in a net margin of 15.4%.
Frequently Asked Questions
ABBV and MSA have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MSA has higher volatility (6.61%) compared to ABBV (6.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ABBV dropped -45.09% vs MSA's -70.32%.
ABBV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.88 vs -0.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ABBV and MSA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer