ABBV vs. META
ABBV (AbbVie Inc.) and META (Meta Platforms, Inc.) are both stocks. ABBV operates in Drug Manufacturers - General (Healthcare), while META operates in Internet Content & Information (Communication Services). Over the past 10 years, ABBV returned 18.45%/yr vs 17.64%/yr for META. At a 0.19 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
ABBV vs. META - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ABBV achieves a 1.08% return, which is significantly higher than META's -10.09% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with ABBV having a 18.45% annualized return and META not far behind at 17.64%.
ABBV
- 1D
- 1.02%
- 1M
- 10.83%
- YTD
- 1.08%
- 6M
- 2.16%
- 1Y
- 25.16%
- 3Y*
- 23.16%
- 5Y*
- 19.52%
- 10Y*
- 18.45%
META
- 1D
- -5.51%
- 1M
- -3.24%
- YTD
- -10.09%
- 6M
- -11.79%
- 1Y
- -13.11%
- 3Y*
- 30.15%
- 5Y*
- 12.59%
- 10Y*
- 17.64%
ABBV vs. META - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ABBV AbbVie Inc. | 1.08% | 33.08% | 18.86% | -0.23% | 24.01% | 32.43% | 27.72% | 1.47% | -0.96% | 60.07% |
META Meta Platforms, Inc. | -10.09% | 13.09% | 66.05% | 194.13% | -64.22% | 23.13% | 33.09% | 56.57% | -25.71% | 53.38% |
Correlation
The correlation between ABBV and META is -0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.07 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.01 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2013 | 0.19 |
The correlation between ABBV and META shifts across timeframes, from -0.07 (1 year) to 0.19 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
ABBV:
$403.11B
META:
$1.52T
ABBV:
$2.05
META:
$27.47
ABBV:
110.71
META:
21.59
ABBV:
6.41
META:
7.09
ABBV:
14.66
META:
6.24
ABBV:
$62.82B
META:
$214.96B
ABBV:
$46.15B
META:
$176.14B
ABBV:
$17.96B
META:
$106.31B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ABBV vs. META — Risk / Return Rank
ABBV
META
ABBV vs. META - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AbbVie Inc. (ABBV) and Meta Platforms, Inc. (META). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ABBV | META | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.41 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.89 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 0.96 | +0.24 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.46 | -0.40 | +1.85 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.27 | -0.84 | +4.11 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ABBV | META | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.04 | -0.37 | +1.41 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.86 | 0.29 | +0.57 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.72 | 0.46 | +0.26 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.75 | 0.55 | +0.20 |
Drawdowns
ABBV vs. META - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ABBV drawdown since its inception was -45.09%, smaller than the maximum META drawdown of -76.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ABBV and META.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ABBV | META | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -45.09% | -76.74% | +31.65% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.32% | -33.30% | +15.98% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.74% | -34.15% | +13.41% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.92% | -76.74% | +54.82% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.09% | -76.74% | +31.65% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.81% | -24.76% | +19.95% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.72% | -15.26% | +4.54% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.71% | 15.60% | -7.89% |
Volatility
ABBV vs. META - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for AbbVie Inc. (ABBV) is 6.15%, while Meta Platforms, Inc. (META) has a volatility of 10.46%. This indicates that ABBV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than META based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ABBV | META | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.15% | 10.46% | -4.31% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.80% | 27.14% | -9.34% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.23% | 35.52% | -11.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.89% | 44.04% | -21.15% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.74% | 38.68% | -12.94% |
Dividends
ABBV vs. META - Dividend Comparison
ABBV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.97%, more than META's 0.35% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ABBV AbbVie Inc. | 2.97% | 2.87% | 3.49% | 3.82% | 3.49% | 3.84% | 4.41% | 4.83% | 3.89% | 2.65% | 3.64% | 3.41% |
META Meta Platforms, Inc. | 0.35% | 0.32% | 0.34% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
ABBV vs. META - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between AbbVie Inc. and Meta Platforms, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
ABBV vs. META - Profitability Comparison
ABBV - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, AbbVie Inc. reported a gross profit of 12.53B and revenue of 15.00B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 83.5%.
META - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Meta Platforms, Inc. reported a gross profit of 46.09B and revenue of 56.31B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 81.9%.
ABBV - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, AbbVie Inc. reported an operating income of 4.73B and revenue of 15.00B, resulting in an operating margin of 31.6%.
META - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Meta Platforms, Inc. reported an operating income of 22.87B and revenue of 56.31B, resulting in an operating margin of 40.6%.
ABBV - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, AbbVie Inc. reported a net income of 699.00M and revenue of 15.00B, resulting in a net margin of 4.7%.
META - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Meta Platforms, Inc. reported a net income of 26.77B and revenue of 56.31B, resulting in a net margin of 47.5%.
Frequently Asked Questions
ABBV and META have a correlation of -0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
META has higher volatility (10.46%) compared to ABBV (6.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ABBV dropped -45.09% vs META's -76.74%.
ABBV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.04 vs -0.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ABBV and META
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer