PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AAZ.L vs. 2099.HK
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

AAZ.L vs. 2099.HK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Anglo Asian Mining plc (AAZ.L) and China Gold International Resources (2099.HK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

AAZ.L is traded in GBp, while 2099.HK is traded in HKD. To make them comparable, the 2099.HK values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AAZ.L achieves a 45.45% return, which is significantly higher than 2099.HK's -19.04% return. Over the past 10 years, AAZ.L has outperformed 2099.HK with an annualized return of 40.95%, while 2099.HK has yielded a comparatively lower 26.60% annualized return.


AAZ.L

1D
2.30%
1M
11.11%
YTD
45.45%
6M
49.53%
1Y
140.96%
3Y*
61.48%
5Y*
26.98%
10Y*
40.95%

2099.HK

1D
5.71%
1M
-16.74%
YTD
-19.04%
6M
-17.26%
1Y
79.03%
3Y*
59.94%
5Y*
47.91%
10Y*
26.60%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AAZ.L vs. 2099.HK - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AAZ.L
Anglo Asian Mining plc
45.45%158.22%83.62%-38.52%-6.15%-9.79%-8.66%81.00%181.08%33.33%
2099.HK
China Gold International Resources
-19.04%258.83%25.72%48.07%29.23%96.73%51.82%-26.55%-28.54%-0.17%

Correlation

The correlation between AAZ.L and 2099.HK is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.23

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.16

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.11

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.13

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 1, 2010

0.11

The correlation between AAZ.L and 2099.HK shifts across timeframes, from 0.11 (5 years) to 0.23 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AAZ.L vs. 2099.HK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AAZ.L
AAZ.L Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
AAZ.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AAZ.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
AAZ.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
AAZ.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
AAZ.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank

2099.HK
2099.HK Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
2099.HK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
2099.HK Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
2099.HK Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
2099.HK Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
2099.HK Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AAZ.L vs. 2099.HK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Anglo Asian Mining plc (AAZ.L) and China Gold International Resources (2099.HK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AAZ.L2099.HKDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.96

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.02

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.23

+0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.02

1.70

+2.32

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.28

4.36

+7.92

AAZ.L vs. 2099.HK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AAZ.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.28, which is higher than the 2099.HK Sharpe Ratio of 1.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AAZ.L and 2099.HK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AAZ.L vs. 2099.HK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AAZ.L drawdown since its inception was -95.63%, which is greater than 2099.HK's maximum drawdown of -90.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AAZ.L and 2099.HK.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AAZ.L2099.HKDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-95.63%

-90.98%

-4.65%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-34.84%

-48.07%

+13.23%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-55.79%

-52.87%

-2.92%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-66.07%

-52.87%

-13.20%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-72.00%

-84.51%

+12.51%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.44%

-45.10%

+42.66%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-45.49%

-47.36%

+1.87%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.43%

18.50%

-7.07%

Volatility

AAZ.L vs. 2099.HK - Volatility Comparison

Anglo Asian Mining plc (AAZ.L) and China Gold International Resources (2099.HK) have volatilities of 21.36% and 21.53%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AAZ.L2099.HKDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

21.36%

21.53%

-0.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

45.70%

45.73%

-0.03%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

61.70%

61.99%

-0.29%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

60.36%

55.74%

+4.62%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

63.01%

54.72%

+8.29%

Dividends

AAZ.L vs. 2099.HK - Dividend Comparison

AAZ.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while 2099.HK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.99%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
2099.HK
China Gold International Resources
2.99%0.40%0.00%8.71%8.56%4.44%0.00%0.00%0.00%
AAZ.L
Anglo Asian Mining plc
0.00%0.00%0.00%5.42%6.64%6.19%5.35%3.61%1.98%

Financials

AAZ.L vs. 2099.HK - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Anglo Asian Mining plc and China Gold International Resources. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Please note, different currencies. AAZ.L values in USD, 2099.HK values in HKD

Frequently Asked Questions


AAZ.L and 2099.HK have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AAZ.L and 2099.HK

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer