PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
2099.HK vs. 010130.KS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

2099.HK vs. 010130.KS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a HK$10,000 investment in China Gold International Resources (2099.HK) and Korea Zinc Inc (010130.KS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

2099.HK is traded in HKD, while 010130.KS is traded in KRW. To make them comparable, the 010130.KS values have been converted to HKD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with 2099.HK having a -19.85% return and 010130.KS slightly higher at -19.64%. Over the past 10 years, 2099.HK has underperformed 010130.KS with an annualized return of 26.69%, while 010130.KS has yielded a comparatively higher 43.33% annualized return.


2099.HK

1D
6.03%
1M
-18.04%
YTD
-19.85%
6M
-18.24%
1Y
72.61%
3Y*
62.20%
5Y*
46.91%
10Y*
26.69%

010130.KS

1D
0.00%
1M
-20.10%
YTD
-19.64%
6M
-23.08%
1Y
19.42%
3Y*
43.61%
5Y*
55.61%
10Y*
43.33%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

2099.HK vs. 010130.KS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
2099.HK
China Gold International Resources
-19.85%287.01%22.94%55.84%15.69%95.98%55.65%-24.05%-32.38%10.09%
010130.KS
Korea Zinc Inc
-19.64%37.81%131.74%21.14%61.17%87.04%56.82%40.11%12.11%48.18%

Correlation

The correlation between 2099.HK and 010130.KS is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.35

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.23

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.24

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.24

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 1, 2010

0.23

The correlation between 2099.HK and 010130.KS shifts across timeframes, from 0.23 (all time) to 0.35 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

2099.HK vs. 010130.KS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

2099.HK
2099.HK Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
2099.HK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
2099.HK Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
2099.HK Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
2099.HK Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
2099.HK Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank

010130.KS
010130.KS Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
010130.KS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
010130.KS Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
010130.KS Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
010130.KS Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
010130.KS Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

2099.HK vs. 010130.KS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for China Gold International Resources (2099.HK) and Korea Zinc Inc (010130.KS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


2099.HK010130.KSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.90

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.80

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.13

+0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.51

0.44

+1.07

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.87

1.02

+2.85

2099.HK vs. 010130.KS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 2099.HK Sharpe Ratio is 1.21, which is higher than the 010130.KS Sharpe Ratio of 0.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 2099.HK and 010130.KS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

2099.HK vs. 010130.KS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 2099.HK drawdown since its inception was -92.85%, which is greater than 010130.KS's maximum drawdown of -84.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 2099.HK and 010130.KS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


2099.HK010130.KSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-92.85%

-84.92%

-7.93%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-49.62%

-53.28%

+3.66%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-51.29%

-66.28%

+14.99%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-51.29%

-66.28%

+14.99%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-84.27%

-66.28%

-17.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-46.58%

-50.68%

+4.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-50.70%

-17.14%

-33.56%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

19.15%

22.50%

-3.35%

Volatility

2099.HK vs. 010130.KS - Volatility Comparison

China Gold International Resources (2099.HK) has a higher volatility of 21.80% compared to Korea Zinc Inc (010130.KS) at 17.66%. This indicates that 2099.HK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than 010130.KS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


2099.HK010130.KSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

21.80%

17.66%

+4.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

46.30%

55.28%

-8.98%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

62.18%

75.29%

-13.11%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

55.87%

71.26%

-15.39%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

54.88%

61.58%

-6.70%

Dividends

2099.HK vs. 010130.KS - Dividend Comparison

2099.HK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.99%, more than 010130.KS's 2.31% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
010130.KS
Korea Zinc Inc
2.31%2.28%17.40%30.12%35.46%39.14%37.36%32.94%25.43%20.28%17.89%18.12%
2099.HK
China Gold International Resources
2.99%0.40%0.00%8.71%8.56%4.44%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

2099.HK vs. 010130.KS - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between China Gold International Resources and Korea Zinc Inc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Please note, different currencies. 2099.HK values in HKD, 010130.KS values in KRW

Frequently Asked Questions


2099.HK and 010130.KS have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for 2099.HK and 010130.KS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer