AAVM vs. AVDV
AAVM (Alpha Architect Global Factor Equity ETF) and AVDV (Avantis International Small Cap Value ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - AAVM is a Multi-factor fund actively managed by Alpha Architect, while AVDV is a Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities fund actively managed by Avantis. Both are actively managed. Over the past 5 years, AAVM returned 7.20%/yr vs 13.72%/yr for AVDV. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. AAVM charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.36%/yr for AVDV.
Performance
AAVM vs. AVDV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AAVM achieves a 17.72% return, which is significantly higher than AVDV's 16.04% return.
AAVM
- 1D
- 0.78%
- 1M
- 3.30%
- YTD
- 17.72%
- 6M
- 21.11%
- 1Y
- 34.30%
- 3Y*
- 19.71%
- 5Y*
- 7.20%
- 10Y*
- —
AVDV
- 1D
- -0.73%
- 1M
- 3.98%
- YTD
- 16.04%
- 6M
- 19.54%
- 1Y
- 44.23%
- 3Y*
- 28.01%
- 5Y*
- 13.72%
- 10Y*
- —
AAVM vs. AVDV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AAVM Alpha Architect Global Factor Equity ETF | 17.72% | 18.54% | 12.07% | -0.74% | -7.00% | 3.52% | 4.69% | 7.44% |
AVDV Avantis International Small Cap Value ETF | 16.04% | 49.37% | 8.67% | 16.85% | -11.47% | 15.80% | 5.01% | 12.05% |
Correlation
The correlation between AAVM and AVDV is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 27, 2019 | 0.70 |
The correlation between AAVM and AVDV shifts across timeframes, from 0.70 (all time) to 0.86 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
AAVM vs. AVDV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
AAVM
AVDV
Industrials
Basic Materials
Consumer Cyclical
Technology
Energy
Healthcare
Utilities
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Real Estate
Financial Services
Industrials
AAVM
AVDV
Basic Materials
AAVM
AVDV
Consumer Cyclical
AAVM
AVDV
Technology
AAVM
AVDV
Energy
AAVM
AVDV
Healthcare
AAVM
AVDV
Utilities
AAVM
AVDV
Consumer Defensive
AAVM
AVDV
Communication Services
AAVM
AVDV
Real Estate
AAVM
AVDV
Financial Services
AAVM
AVDV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AAVM vs. AVDV — Risk / Return Rank
AAVM
AVDV
AAVM vs. AVDV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alpha Architect Global Factor Equity ETF (AAVM) and Avantis International Small Cap Value ETF (AVDV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AAVM | AVDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.26 | 2.86 | -0.60 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.18 | 3.79 | -0.62 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.41 | 1.52 | -0.10 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.28 | 3.37 | -0.09 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.79 | 13.67 | +0.12 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AAVM | AVDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.26 | 2.86 | -0.60 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.46 | 0.80 | -0.34 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.35 | 0.80 | -0.45 |
Drawdowns
AAVM vs. AVDV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AAVM drawdown since its inception was -34.71%, smaller than the maximum AVDV drawdown of -43.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AAVM and AVDV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AAVM | AVDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.71% | -43.01% | +8.30% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.85% | -13.19% | +2.34% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.23% | -14.17% | -6.06% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.73% | -28.08% | +4.35% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.19% | -1.35% | +1.16% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.32% | -6.77% | -6.55% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.58% | 3.24% | -0.66% |
Volatility
AAVM vs. AVDV - Volatility Comparison
Alpha Architect Global Factor Equity ETF (AAVM) and Avantis International Small Cap Value ETF (AVDV) have volatilities of 5.08% and 4.92%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AAVM | AVDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.08% | 4.92% | +0.16% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.89% | 13.07% | -0.18% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.28% | 15.56% | -0.28% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.68% | 17.30% | -1.62% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.91% | 19.73% | -4.82% |
AAVM vs. AVDV - Expense Ratio Comparison
AAVM has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than AVDV's 0.36% expense ratio.
Dividends
AAVM vs. AVDV - Dividend Comparison
AAVM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.74%, less than AVDV's 2.74% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AAVM Alpha Architect Global Factor Equity ETF | 1.74% | 2.05% | 2.54% | 4.13% | 2.24% | 0.82% | 0.00% | 1.76% | 0.93% | 0.81% |
AVDV Avantis International Small Cap Value ETF | 2.74% | 3.05% | 4.31% | 3.29% | 3.17% | 2.39% | 1.67% | 0.36% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AAVM and AVDV have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AAVM has higher volatility (5.08%) compared to AVDV (4.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AAVM dropped -34.71% vs AVDV's -43.01%.
On 5-year performance, AVDV leads with 13.72% vs 7.20% for AAVM. On fees, AVDV is cheaper at 0.36% per year. On volatility, AVDV has been the lower-risk option at 4.92%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, AVDV has performed better with a 13.72% return vs 7.20%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
AVDV is cheaper with a 0.36% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for AAVM.
AVDV has the higher dividend yield at 2.74%, compared with 1.74% for AAVM.
AAVM is categorized as Multi-factor, while AVDV is Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities. They also come from different issuers: Alpha Architect and Avantis. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for AAVM and 0.36% for AVDV.
AVDV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.86 vs 2.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AAVM and AVDV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer