AAUTX vs. HFCVX

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

AAUTX (Thrivent Large Cap Value Fund) and HFCVX (Hennessy Cornerstone Value Fund) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, AAUTX returned 13.14%/yr vs 11.25%/yr for HFCVX. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. AAUTX charges 0.86%/yr vs 1.23%/yr for HFCVX.

Performance

AAUTX vs. HFCVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Thrivent Large Cap Value Fund (AAUTX) and Hennessy Cornerstone Value Fund (HFCVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with AAUTX having a 12.43% return and HFCVX slightly lower at 11.85%. Over the past 10 years, AAUTX has outperformed HFCVX with an annualized return of 13.14%, while HFCVX has yielded a comparatively lower 11.25% annualized return.

AAUTX

• 1D: -0.14%
• 1M: 0.64%
• YTD: 12.43%
• 6M: 12.00%
• 1Y: 27.88%
• 3Y*: 21.48%
• 5Y*: 13.86%
• 10Y*: 13.14%

HFCVX

• 1D: 0.61%
• 1M: -2.88%
• YTD: 11.85%
• 6M: 12.00%
• 1Y: 22.15%
• 3Y*: 15.78%
• 5Y*: 11.87%
• 10Y*: 11.25%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AAUTX vs. HFCVX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
AAUTX Thrivent Large Cap Value Fund	12.43%	19.31%	21.28%	12.63%	-4.89%	31.65%	4.31%	23.66%	-8.82%	12.59%
HFCVX Hennessy Cornerstone Value Fund	11.85%	18.27%	9.59%	5.81%	6.12%	29.94%	-6.39%	20.84%	-9.50%	19.21%

Correlation

The correlation between AAUTX and HFCVX is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.67
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.80
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.85
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.88
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 1, 1996	0.89

Over the past year, the correlation between AAUTX and HFCVX has dropped to 0.67 - well below their long-term average of 0.89, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

AAUTX vs. HFCVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AAUTX

AAUTX Risk / Return Rank: 86
AAUTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 86
AAUTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 82
AAUTX Omega Ratio Rank: 79
AAUTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 91
AAUTX Martin Ratio Rank: 91

HFCVX

HFCVX Risk / Return Rank: 81
HFCVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
HFCVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 78
HFCVX Omega Ratio Rank: 64
HFCVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
HFCVX Martin Ratio Rank: 91

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AAUTX vs. HFCVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Thrivent Large Cap Value Fund (AAUTX) and Hennessy Cornerstone Value Fund (HFCVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	AAUTX	HFCVX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.59	2.37	+0.23
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.57	3.39	+0.18
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.47	1.41	+0.06
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.44	5.89	-1.45
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	16.96	17.08	-0.12

AAUTX vs. HFCVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AAUTX Sharpe Ratio is 2.59, which is comparable to the HFCVX Sharpe Ratio of 2.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AAUTX and HFCVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

AAUTX vs. HFCVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AAUTX drawdown since its inception was -54.34%, smaller than the maximum HFCVX drawdown of -65.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AAUTX and HFCVX.

Drawdown Indicators

	AAUTX	HFCVX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-54.34%	-65.75%	+11.41%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.48%	-3.77%	-2.71%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.85%	-11.32%	-3.53%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-18.71%	-16.81%	-1.90%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-38.88%	-39.39%	+0.51%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.14%	-2.88%	+1.74%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.98%	-8.22%	+0.24%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.69%	1.30%	+0.39%

Volatility

AAUTX vs. HFCVX - Volatility Comparison

Thrivent Large Cap Value Fund (AAUTX) has a higher volatility of 3.54% compared to Hennessy Cornerstone Value Fund (HFCVX) at 3.21%. This indicates that AAUTX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HFCVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AAUTX	HFCVX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.54%	3.21%	+0.33%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.34%	6.99%	+1.35%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.12%	9.39%	+1.73%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.85%	13.24%	+2.61%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.80%	16.46%	+1.34%

AAUTX vs. HFCVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

AAUTX has a 0.86% expense ratio, which is lower than HFCVX's 1.23% expense ratio.

Dividends

AAUTX vs. HFCVX - Dividend Comparison

AAUTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.70%, less than HFCVX's 6.61% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
AAUTX Thrivent Large Cap Value Fund	4.70%	5.28%	16.25%	3.22%	6.12%	7.62%	6.33%	1.52%	7.44%	1.08%	1.18%	0.00%
HFCVX Hennessy Cornerstone Value Fund	6.61%	7.39%	4.56%	3.57%	10.33%	4.81%	2.58%	6.58%	17.16%	14.97%	2.26%	2.57%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AAUTX and HFCVX in my portfolio?

AAUTX and HFCVX have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, AAUTX or HFCVX?

AAUTX has higher volatility (3.54%) compared to HFCVX (3.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AAUTX dropped -54.34% vs HFCVX's -65.75%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

AAUTX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.59 vs 2.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.