AAUTX vs. AAMBX

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

AAUTX (Thrivent Large Cap Value Fund) and AAMBX (Thrivent Municipal Bond Fund) are both mutual funds - AAUTX is a Large Cap Value Equities fund managed by Thrivent, while AAMBX is a Municipal Bonds fund managed by Thrivent. Over the past 10 years, AAUTX returned 12.76%/yr vs 1.79%/yr for AAMBX. At a correlation of -0.09, they often move in opposite directions. AAUTX charges 0.86%/yr vs 0.74%/yr for AAMBX.

Performance

AAUTX vs. AAMBX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Thrivent Large Cap Value Fund (AAUTX) and Thrivent Municipal Bond Fund (AAMBX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AAUTX achieves a 12.74% return, which is significantly higher than AAMBX's 1.88% return. Over the past 10 years, AAUTX has outperformed AAMBX with an annualized return of 12.76%, while AAMBX has yielded a comparatively lower 1.79% annualized return.

AAUTX

• 1D: -0.41%
• 1M: 3.16%
• YTD: 12.74%
• 6M: 14.29%
• 1Y: 30.94%
• 3Y*: 22.06%
• 5Y*: 13.25%
• 10Y*: 12.76%

AAMBX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.88%
• YTD: 1.88%
• 6M: 2.20%
• 1Y: 7.56%
• 3Y*: 3.89%
• 5Y*: 0.56%
• 10Y*: 1.79%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AAUTX vs. AAMBX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
AAUTX Thrivent Large Cap Value Fund	12.74%	19.31%	21.28%	12.63%	-4.89%	31.65%	4.31%	23.66%	-8.82%	12.59%
AAMBX Thrivent Municipal Bond Fund	1.88%	3.39%	2.70%	6.18%	-10.93%	1.99%	4.78%	7.38%	0.32%	4.47%

Correlation

The correlation between AAUTX and AAMBX is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.18
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.15
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.08
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	-0.05
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 21, 1996	-0.09

The correlation between AAUTX and AAMBX shifts across timeframes, from -0.09 (all time) to 0.18 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

AAUTX vs. AAMBX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AAUTX

AAUTX Risk / Return Rank: 86
AAUTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 86
AAUTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 82
AAUTX Omega Ratio Rank: 78
AAUTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 91
AAUTX Martin Ratio Rank: 91

AAMBX

AAMBX Risk / Return Rank: 62
AAMBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 63
AAMBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 76
AAMBX Omega Ratio Rank: 83
AAMBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 45
AAMBX Martin Ratio Rank: 41

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AAUTX vs. AAMBX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Thrivent Large Cap Value Fund (AAUTX) and Thrivent Municipal Bond Fund (AAMBX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	AAUTX	AAMBX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.82	2.32	+0.50
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.92	3.65	+0.27
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.51	1.55	-0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.71	2.53	+2.17
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	18.22	8.76	+9.47
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

AAUTX vs. AAMBX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AAUTX Sharpe Ratio is 2.82, which is comparable to the AAMBX Sharpe Ratio of 2.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AAUTX and AAMBX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	AAUTX	AAMBX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.82	2.32	+0.50
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.84	0.12	+0.72
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.72	0.41	+0.31
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.45	0.46	-0.01

Drawdowns

AAUTX vs. AAMBX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AAUTX drawdown since its inception was -54.34%, which is greater than AAMBX's maximum drawdown of -49.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AAUTX and AAMBX.

Drawdown Indicators

	AAUTX	AAMBX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-54.34%	-49.18%	-5.16%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.48%	-3.13%	-3.35%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.85%	-7.56%	-7.29%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-18.71%	-16.17%	-2.54%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-38.88%	-16.17%	-22.71%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.41%	-0.08%	-0.33%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.99%	-5.20%	-2.79%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.67%	0.90%	+0.77%

Volatility

AAUTX vs. AAMBX - Volatility Comparison

Thrivent Large Cap Value Fund (AAUTX) has a higher volatility of 2.45% compared to Thrivent Municipal Bond Fund (AAMBX) at 1.30%. This indicates that AAUTX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AAMBX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AAUTX	AAMBX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.45%	1.30%	+1.15%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.98%	2.53%	+5.45%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.82%	3.42%	+7.40%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.85%	4.77%	+11.08%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.78%	4.43%	+13.35%

AAUTX vs. AAMBX - Expense Ratio Comparison

AAUTX has a 0.86% expense ratio, which is higher than AAMBX's 0.74% expense ratio.

Dividends

AAUTX vs. AAMBX - Dividend Comparison

AAUTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.69%, more than AAMBX's 3.51% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
AAMBX Thrivent Municipal Bond Fund	3.51%	4.65%	3.93%	2.58%	2.97%	2.66%	2.80%	3.35%	3.45%	3.40%	3.41%	3.39%
AAUTX Thrivent Large Cap Value Fund	4.69%	5.28%	16.25%	3.22%	6.12%	7.62%	6.33%	1.52%	7.44%	1.08%	1.18%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AAUTX and AAMBX in my portfolio?

AAUTX and AAMBX have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, AAUTX or AAMBX?

AAUTX has higher volatility (2.45%) compared to AAMBX (1.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AAUTX dropped -54.34% vs AAMBX's -49.18%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

AAUTX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.82 vs 2.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.