AAUS vs. UJUN

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

AAUS (Alpha Architect US Equity ETF) and UJUN (Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - June) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. AAUS is actively managed, while UJUN is passively managed. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. AAUS charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for UJUN.

Performance

AAUS vs. UJUN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Alpha Architect US Equity ETF (AAUS) and Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - June (UJUN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AAUS achieves a 9.48% return, which is significantly higher than UJUN's 3.32% return.

AAUS

• 1D: -0.74%
• 1M: 4.93%
• YTD: 9.48%
• 6M: 9.33%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

UJUN

• 1D: -0.30%
• 1M: 0.45%
• YTD: 3.32%
• 6M: 4.16%
• 1Y: 10.04%
• 3Y*: 11.26%
• 5Y*: 6.38%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AAUS vs. UJUN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
AAUS Alpha Architect US Equity ETF	9.48%	9.66%
UJUN Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - June	3.32%	4.11%

Correlation

The correlation between AAUS and UJUN is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 24, 2025	0.86

Return for Risk

AAUS vs. UJUN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UJUN

UJUN Risk / Return Rank: 81
UJUN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 73
UJUN Sortino Ratio Rank: 81
UJUN Omega Ratio Rank: 88
UJUN Calmar Ratio Rank: 72
UJUN Martin Ratio Rank: 91

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AAUS vs. UJUN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alpha Architect US Equity ETF (AAUS) and Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - June (UJUN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	AAUS	UJUN	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	2.40	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.77	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.90	0.77	+1.13

Drawdowns

AAUS vs. UJUN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AAUS drawdown since its inception was -9.13%, smaller than the maximum UJUN drawdown of -13.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AAUS and UJUN.

Drawdown Indicators

	AAUS	UJUN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-9.13%	-13.73%	+4.60%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-2.84%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-11.24%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-11.96%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.74%	-0.30%	-0.44%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.31%	-2.07%	+0.76%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	0.46%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	AAUS	UJUN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	0.41%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	3.25%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.45%	4.25%	+8.20%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.45%	8.32%	+4.13%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	12.45%	8.77%	+3.68%

AAUS vs. UJUN - Expense Ratio Comparison

AAUS has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than UJUN's 0.79% expense ratio.

Dividends

AAUS vs. UJUN - Dividend Comparison

AAUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.34%, while UJUN has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
AAUS Alpha Architect US Equity ETF	0.34%	0.37%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
UJUN Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - June	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	3.89%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AAUS and UJUN in my portfolio?

AAUS and UJUN have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, AAUS or UJUN?

On fees, AAUS is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, AAUS or UJUN?

AAUS is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for UJUN.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, AAUS or UJUN?

AAUS has the higher dividend yield at 0.34%, compared with 0.00% for UJUN.

What is the main difference between AAUS and UJUN?

They also come from different issuers: Alpha Architect and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for AAUS and 0.79% for UJUN.