AAUS vs. PSMD
AAUS (Alpha Architect US Equity ETF) and PSMD (Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (December) ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - AAUS is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Alpha Architect, while PSMD is a Defined Outcome fund actively managed by Pacer. Both are actively managed. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. AAUS charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for PSMD.
Performance
AAUS vs. PSMD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AAUS achieves a 9.11% return, which is significantly higher than PSMD's 6.15% return.
AAUS
- 1D
- -0.60%
- 1M
- 0.35%
- 6M
- 8.07%
- YTD
- 9.11%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PSMD
- 1D
- -0.17%
- 1M
- 0.47%
- 6M
- 5.33%
- YTD
- 6.15%
- 1Y
- 12.77%
- 3Y*
- 11.91%
- 5Y*
- 9.23%
- 10Y*
- —
AAUS vs. PSMD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
AAUS Alpha Architect US Equity ETF | 9.11% | 10.11% |
PSMD Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (December) ETF | 6.15% | 5.74% |
Correlation
The correlation between AAUS and PSMD is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 23, 2025 | 0.89 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AAUS vs. PSMD — Risk / Return Rank
AAUS
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
PSMD
AAUS vs. PSMD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alpha Architect US Equity ETF (AAUS) and Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (December) ETF (PSMD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| AAUS | PSMD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.46 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.90 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 15.03 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
AAUS vs. PSMD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AAUS drawdown since its inception was -9.13%, smaller than the maximum PSMD drawdown of -11.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AAUS and PSMD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AAUS | PSMD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -9.13% | -11.96% | +2.83% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -4.42% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -10.70% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -11.96% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.08% | -0.17% | -0.91% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.39% | -1.63% | +0.24% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.85% | — |
Volatility
AAUS vs. PSMD - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AAUS | PSMD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 1.60% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 4.88% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.67% | 5.74% | +6.93% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.67% | 8.64% | +4.03% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.67% | 8.43% | +4.24% |
AAUS vs. PSMD - Expense Ratio Comparison
AAUS has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than PSMD's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
AAUS vs. PSMD - Dividend Comparison
AAUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.34%, while PSMD has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AAUS Alpha Architect US Equity ETF | 0.34% | 0.37% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PSMD Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (December) ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.47% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AAUS and PSMD have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, AAUS is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
AAUS is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for PSMD.
AAUS has the higher dividend yield at 0.34%, compared with 0.00% for PSMD.
AAUS is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while PSMD is Defined Outcome. They also come from different issuers: Alpha Architect and Pacer. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for AAUS and 0.75% for PSMD.
Find the right allocation for AAUS and PSMD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer