AAUS vs. BOXX
AAUS (Alpha Architect US Equity ETF) and BOXX (Alpha Architect 1-3 Month Box ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - AAUS is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Alpha Architect, while BOXX is a Ultrashort Bond fund tracking the Solactive 1-3 Month US T-Bill Index. AAUS is actively managed, while BOXX is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.00, they often move in opposite directions. AAUS charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for BOXX.
Performance
AAUS vs. BOXX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AAUS achieves a 9.11% return, which is significantly higher than BOXX's 2.06% return.
AAUS
- 1D
- -0.60%
- 1M
- 0.35%
- 6M
- 8.07%
- YTD
- 9.11%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BOXX
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 0.38%
- 6M
- 1.88%
- YTD
- 2.06%
- 1Y
- 4.10%
- 3Y*
- 4.71%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AAUS vs. BOXX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
AAUS Alpha Architect US Equity ETF | 9.11% | 10.11% |
BOXX Alpha Architect 1-3 Month Box ETF | 2.06% | 1.92% |
Correlation
The correlation between AAUS and BOXX is -0.00, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 23, 2025 | -0.00 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AAUS vs. BOXX — Risk / Return Rank
AAUS
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
BOXX
AAUS vs. BOXX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alpha Architect US Equity ETF (AAUS) and Alpha Architect 1-3 Month Box ETF (BOXX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| AAUS | BOXX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 8.83 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 59.89 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 504.46 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
AAUS vs. BOXX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AAUS drawdown since its inception was -9.13%, which is greater than BOXX's maximum drawdown of -0.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AAUS and BOXX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AAUS | BOXX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -9.13% | -0.12% | -9.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -0.07% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -0.12% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.08% | 0.00% | -1.08% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.39% | -0.00% | -1.39% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.01% | — |
Volatility
AAUS vs. BOXX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AAUS | BOXX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.11% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 0.26% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.67% | 0.33% | +12.34% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.67% | 0.37% | +12.30% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.67% | 0.37% | +12.30% |
AAUS vs. BOXX - Expense Ratio Comparison
AAUS has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than BOXX's 0.19% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
AAUS vs. BOXX - Dividend Comparison
AAUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.34%, while BOXX has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
AAUS Alpha Architect US Equity ETF | 0.34% | 0.37% | 0.00% |
BOXX Alpha Architect 1-3 Month Box ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.26% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AAUS and BOXX have a correlation of -0.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, AAUS is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
AAUS is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.19% for BOXX.
AAUS has the higher dividend yield at 0.34%, compared with 0.00% for BOXX.
AAUS is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while BOXX is Ultrashort Bond. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for AAUS and 0.19% for BOXX.
Find the right allocation for AAUS and BOXX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer