PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AAUM vs. SPCZ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AAUM vs. SPCZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tema Alternative Asset Managers ETF (AAUM) and RiverNorth Enhanced Pre-Merger SPAC ETF (SPCZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AAUM achieves a -15.70% return, which is significantly lower than SPCZ's 1.36% return.


AAUM

1D
4.05%
1M
-4.38%
YTD
-15.70%
6M
-11.38%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

SPCZ

1D
-0.15%
1M
0.59%
YTD
1.36%
6M
1.44%
1Y
4.77%
3Y*
6.47%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AAUM vs. SPCZ - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between AAUM and SPCZ is 0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2025

0.08

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AAUM vs. SPCZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AAUM

SPCZ
SPCZ Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
SPCZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPCZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPCZ Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
SPCZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPCZ Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AAUM vs. SPCZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tema Alternative Asset Managers ETF (AAUM) and RiverNorth Enhanced Pre-Merger SPAC ETF (SPCZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

AAUM vs. SPCZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AAUMSPCZDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.62

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.76

1.14

-1.90

Drawdowns

AAUM vs. SPCZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AAUM drawdown since its inception was -28.24%, which is greater than SPCZ's maximum drawdown of -4.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AAUM and SPCZ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AAUMSPCZDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.24%

-4.47%

-23.77%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.82%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.47%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-20.34%

-1.68%

-18.66%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.03%

-0.51%

-11.52%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.59%

Volatility

AAUM vs. SPCZ - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AAUMSPCZDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.65%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.30%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27.91%

7.77%

+20.14%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

27.91%

5.59%

+22.32%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.91%

5.59%

+22.32%

AAUM vs. SPCZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

AAUM has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than SPCZ's 0.90% expense ratio.


Dividends

AAUM vs. SPCZ - Dividend Comparison

AAUM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.89%, less than SPCZ's 11.89% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
AAUM
Tema Alternative Asset Managers ETF
0.89%0.75%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SPCZ
RiverNorth Enhanced Pre-Merger SPAC ETF
11.89%12.06%4.24%5.01%0.22%

Frequently Asked Questions


AAUM and SPCZ have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, AAUM is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

AAUM is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for SPCZ.

SPCZ has the higher dividend yield at 11.89%, compared with 0.89% for AAUM.

They also come from different issuers: Tema ETFs and RiverNorth. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for AAUM and 0.90% for SPCZ.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AAUM and SPCZ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer