AAUM vs. QABA

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

AAUM (Tema Alternative Asset Managers ETF) and QABA (First Trust NASDAQ ABA Community Bank Index Fund) are both Financials Equities funds. AAUM is actively managed, while QABA is passively managed. A 0.51 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. AAUM charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for QABA.

Performance

AAUM vs. QABA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tema Alternative Asset Managers ETF (AAUM) and First Trust NASDAQ ABA Community Bank Index Fund (QABA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AAUM achieves a -15.70% return, which is significantly lower than QABA's 11.34% return.

AAUM

• 1D: 4.05%
• 1M: -4.38%
• YTD: -15.70%
• 6M: -11.38%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

QABA

• 1D: 2.94%
• 1M: 1.12%
• YTD: 11.34%
• 6M: 10.44%
• 1Y: 23.63%
• 3Y*: 19.81%
• 5Y*: 3.69%
• 10Y*: 7.00%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AAUM vs. QABA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
AAUM Tema Alternative Asset Managers ETF	-15.70%	1.19%
QABA First Trust NASDAQ ABA Community Bank Index Fund	11.34%	2.34%

Correlation

The correlation between AAUM and QABA is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2025	0.51

Return for Risk

AAUM vs. QABA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QABA

QABA Risk / Return Rank: 32
QABA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 30
QABA Sortino Ratio Rank: 30
QABA Omega Ratio Rank: 31
QABA Calmar Ratio Rank: 39
QABA Martin Ratio Rank: 32

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AAUM vs. QABA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tema Alternative Asset Managers ETF (AAUM) and First Trust NASDAQ ABA Community Bank Index Fund (QABA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	AAUM	QABA	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	1.05	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.14	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.24	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.76	0.35	-1.11

Drawdowns

AAUM vs. QABA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AAUM drawdown since its inception was -28.24%, smaller than the maximum QABA drawdown of -49.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AAUM and QABA.

Drawdown Indicators

	AAUM	QABA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-28.24%	-49.30%	+21.06%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-12.49%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-25.82%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-42.93%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-49.30%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-20.34%	-1.44%	-18.90%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-12.03%	-11.43%	-0.60%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	5.02%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	AAUM	QABA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	6.18%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	15.47%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	27.91%	22.64%	+5.27%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	27.91%	26.53%	+1.38%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	27.91%	28.70%	-0.79%

AAUM vs. QABA - Expense Ratio Comparison

AAUM has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than QABA's 0.60% expense ratio.

Dividends

AAUM vs. QABA - Dividend Comparison

AAUM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.89%, less than QABA's 2.33% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
AAUM Tema Alternative Asset Managers ETF	0.89%	0.75%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
QABA First Trust NASDAQ ABA Community Bank Index Fund	2.33%	2.52%	2.37%	2.71%	2.10%	1.68%	2.55%	1.95%	1.90%	1.42%	1.13%	1.39%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AAUM and QABA in my portfolio?

AAUM and QABA have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, AAUM or QABA?

On fees, QABA is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, AAUM or QABA?

QABA is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for AAUM.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, AAUM or QABA?

QABA has the higher dividend yield at 2.33%, compared with 0.89% for AAUM.

What is the main difference between AAUM and QABA?

They also come from different issuers: Tema ETFs and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for AAUM and 0.60% for QABA.