PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AASOX vs. WMKSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AASOX vs. WMKSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Alger Small Cap Growth Portfolio (AASOX) and WesMark Small Company Fund (WMKSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AASOX achieves a 11.91% return, which is significantly lower than WMKSX's 20.14% return. Over the past 10 years, AASOX has underperformed WMKSX with an annualized return of 9.27%, while WMKSX has yielded a comparatively higher 14.11% annualized return.


AASOX

1D
-1.88%
1M
6.76%
YTD
11.91%
6M
8.70%
1Y
24.81%
3Y*
11.74%
5Y*
-4.02%
10Y*
9.27%

WMKSX

1D
-0.62%
1M
4.65%
YTD
20.14%
6M
17.56%
1Y
33.60%
3Y*
25.52%
5Y*
11.21%
10Y*
14.11%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AASOX vs. WMKSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AASOX
Alger Small Cap Growth Portfolio
11.91%5.89%8.12%16.49%-38.39%-5.07%67.18%29.36%1.47%28.73%
WMKSX
WesMark Small Company Fund
20.14%16.19%22.12%19.42%-20.72%22.81%36.78%20.32%-13.92%13.21%

Correlation

The correlation between AASOX and WMKSX is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.83

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.87

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.85

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.83

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 31, 1993

0.77

The correlation between AASOX and WMKSX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AASOX vs. WMKSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AASOX
AASOX Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
AASOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AASOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
AASOX Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
AASOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
AASOX Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank

WMKSX
WMKSX Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
WMKSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WMKSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
WMKSX Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
WMKSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
WMKSX Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AASOX vs. WMKSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alger Small Cap Growth Portfolio (AASOX) and WesMark Small Company Fund (WMKSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AASOXWMKSXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.81

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.07

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.33

-0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.48

4.14

-2.66

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.90

13.86

-8.96

AASOX vs. WMKSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AASOX Sharpe Ratio is 1.16, which is lower than the WMKSX Sharpe Ratio of 1.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AASOX and WMKSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AASOX vs. WMKSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AASOX drawdown since its inception was -74.54%, which is greater than WMKSX's maximum drawdown of -64.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AASOX and WMKSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AASOXWMKSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-74.54%

-64.09%

-10.45%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.34%

-8.50%

-9.84%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-32.82%

-24.20%

-8.62%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-60.50%

-39.84%

-20.66%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-60.50%

-39.84%

-20.66%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-36.37%

-0.62%

-35.75%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-29.85%

-15.65%

-14.20%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.54%

2.53%

+3.01%

Volatility

AASOX vs. WMKSX - Volatility Comparison

Alger Small Cap Growth Portfolio (AASOX) has a higher volatility of 8.89% compared to WesMark Small Company Fund (WMKSX) at 4.61%. This indicates that AASOX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WMKSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AASOXWMKSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.89%

4.61%

+4.28%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.79%

12.32%

+6.47%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.46%

17.91%

+5.55%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

40.48%

26.13%

+14.35%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

33.51%

23.96%

+9.55%

AASOX vs. WMKSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

AASOX has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than WMKSX's 1.24% expense ratio.


Dividends

AASOX vs. WMKSX - Dividend Comparison

AASOX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.05%, less than WMKSX's 19.07% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AASOX
Alger Small Cap Growth Portfolio
1.05%1.17%0.38%0.00%22.43%49.73%6.88%5.59%4.58%0.00%0.00%0.00%
WMKSX
WesMark Small Company Fund
19.07%22.91%4.69%5.93%6.23%25.75%8.21%0.00%12.53%8.59%5.26%6.57%

Frequently Asked Questions


AASOX and WMKSX have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AASOX has higher volatility (8.89%) compared to WMKSX (4.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AASOX dropped -74.54% vs WMKSX's -64.09%.

WMKSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.97 vs 1.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AASOX and WMKSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer