AASMX vs. VB
AASMX (Thrivent Small Cap Stock Fund) and VB (Vanguard Small-Cap ETF) are both Small Cap Blend Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, AASMX returned 10.86%/yr vs 11.08%/yr for VB. Their 0.96 correlation means they have historically moved very closely together. AASMX charges 1.07%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for VB.
Performance
AASMX vs. VB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with AASMX having a 15.31% return and VB slightly lower at 15.19%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with AASMX having a 10.86% annualized return and VB not far ahead at 11.08%.
AASMX
- 1D
- 1.56%
- 1M
- -2.55%
- 6M
- 9.10%
- YTD
- 15.31%
- 1Y
- 23.75%
- 3Y*
- 10.55%
- 5Y*
- 6.46%
- 10Y*
- 10.86%
- ALL TIME*
- 8.93%
VB
- 1D
- -0.22%
- 1M
- -1.73%
- 6M
- 10.09%
- YTD
- 15.19%
- 1Y
- 25.91%
- 3Y*
- 14.02%
- 5Y*
- 7.45%
- 10Y*
- 11.08%
- ALL TIME*
- 9.88%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | |
| $121.48M | $119.40M | $165.11M |
AASMX vs. VB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AASMX Thrivent Small Cap Stock Fund | 15.31% | 2.13% | 13.02% | 12.20% | -11.24% | 23.82% | 22.48% | 27.55% | -10.77% | 11.70% |
VB Vanguard Small-Cap ETF | 15.19% | 8.87% | 14.17% | 18.22% | -17.51% | 17.57% | 19.19% | 27.34% | -9.34% | 16.26% |
Correlation
The correlation between AASMX and VB is 0.93, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.93 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.95 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.96 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.95 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 30, 2004 | 0.96 |
The correlation between AASMX and VB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AASMX vs. VB — Risk / Return Rank
AASMX
VB
AASMX vs. VB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Thrivent Small Cap Stock Fund (AASMX) and Vanguard Small-Cap ETF (VB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| AASMX | VB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.29 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.33 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.26 | -0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.76 | 2.67 | -0.91 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.76 | 9.73 | -3.97 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
AASMX vs. VB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AASMX drawdown since its inception was -57.13%, roughly equal to the maximum VB drawdown of -59.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AASMX and VB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AASMX | VB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -57.13% | -59.56% | +2.43% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.55% | -8.98% | -2.57% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.56% | -25.36% | -1.20% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.43% | -28.15% | -1.28% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.66% | -42.05% | +0.39% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.02% | -2.63% | -1.39% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.76% | -8.39% | -2.37% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.52% | 2.46% | +1.06% |
Volatility
AASMX vs. VB - Volatility Comparison
Thrivent Small Cap Stock Fund (AASMX) has a higher volatility of 4.06% compared to Vanguard Small-Cap ETF (VB) at 3.36%. This indicates that AASMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AASMX | VB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.06% | 3.36% | +0.70% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.70% | 12.01% | +0.69% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.39% | 16.47% | +0.92% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.31% | 20.69% | +1.62% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.60% | 21.37% | +1.23% |
AASMX vs. VB - Expense Ratio Comparison
AASMX has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is higher than VB's 0.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
AASMX vs. VB - Dividend Comparison
AASMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.72%, more than VB's 1.22% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AASMX Thrivent Small Cap Stock Fund | 2.72% | 3.14% | 4.21% | 0.42% | 12.87% | 14.74% | 1.83% | 10.84% | 18.67% | 0.00% | 0.17% | 0.00% |
VB Vanguard Small-Cap ETF | 1.22% | 1.33% | 1.30% | 1.55% | 1.59% | 1.24% | 1.14% | 1.39% | 1.67% | 1.35% | 1.50% | 1.48% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.93, AASMX and VB move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
AASMX has higher volatility (4.06%) compared to VB (3.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AASMX dropped -57.13% vs VB's -59.56%.
VB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.46 vs 1.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AASMX and VB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer