AASMX vs. VB
Compare and contrast key facts about Thrivent Small Cap Stock Fund (AASMX) and Vanguard Small-Cap ETF (VB).
AASMX is managed by Thrivent. It was launched on Jul 1, 1996. VB is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the CRSP US Small Cap. It was launched on Jan 26, 2004.
Performance
AASMX vs. VB - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
AASMX vs. VB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AASMX Thrivent Small Cap Stock Fund | -3.28% | 2.13% | 13.02% | 12.20% | -11.24% | 23.82% | 22.48% | 27.55% | -10.77% | 11.70% |
VB Vanguard Small-Cap ETF | 1.92% | 8.87% | 14.17% | 18.22% | -17.51% | 17.57% | 19.19% | 27.34% | -9.34% | 16.26% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AASMX achieves a -3.28% return, which is significantly lower than VB's 1.92% return. Over the past 10 years, AASMX has underperformed VB with an annualized return of 9.89%, while VB has yielded a comparatively higher 10.51% annualized return.
AASMX
- 1D
- -1.15%
- 1M
- -9.52%
- YTD
- -3.28%
- 6M
- -1.97%
- 1Y
- 9.87%
- 3Y*
- 6.06%
- 5Y*
- 3.84%
- 10Y*
- 9.89%
VB
- 1D
- 3.18%
- 1M
- -5.13%
- YTD
- 1.92%
- 6M
- 3.76%
- 1Y
- 19.75%
- 3Y*
- 13.04%
- 5Y*
- 5.35%
- 10Y*
- 10.51%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
AASMX vs. VB - Expense Ratio Comparison
AASMX has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is higher than VB's 0.05% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
AASMX vs. VB — Risk / Return Rank
AASMX
VB
AASMX vs. VB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Thrivent Small Cap Stock Fund (AASMX) and Vanguard Small-Cap ETF (VB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AASMX | VB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.45 | 0.91 | -0.46 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.80 | 1.41 | -0.61 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.10 | 1.19 | -0.09 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.54 | 1.39 | -0.84 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.97 | 5.97 | -4.00 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AASMX | VB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.45 | 0.91 | -0.46 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.17 | 0.26 | -0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.44 | 0.49 | -0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.37 | 0.42 | -0.04 |
Correlation
The correlation between AASMX and VB is 0.96, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
AASMX vs. VB - Dividend Comparison
AASMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.24%, more than VB's 1.34% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AASMX Thrivent Small Cap Stock Fund | 3.24% | 3.14% | 4.21% | 0.42% | 12.87% | 14.74% | 1.83% | 10.84% | 18.67% | 0.00% | 0.17% | 0.00% |
VB Vanguard Small-Cap ETF | 1.34% | 1.33% | 1.30% | 1.55% | 1.59% | 1.24% | 1.14% | 1.39% | 1.67% | 1.35% | 1.50% | 1.48% |
Drawdowns
AASMX vs. VB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AASMX drawdown since its inception was -57.13%, roughly equal to the maximum VB drawdown of -59.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AASMX and VB.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| AASMX | VB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -57.13% | -59.56% | +2.43% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.37% | -14.29% | -0.08% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.43% | -28.15% | -1.28% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.66% | -42.05% | +0.39% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.35% | -6.08% | -5.27% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.86% | -8.49% | -2.37% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.98% | 3.32% | +0.66% |
Volatility
AASMX vs. VB - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Thrivent Small Cap Stock Fund (AASMX) is 6.30%, while Vanguard Small-Cap ETF (VB) has a volatility of 6.84%. This indicates that AASMX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| AASMX | VB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.30% | 6.84% | -0.54% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.49% | 12.60% | -0.11% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.20% | 21.86% | +0.34% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.36% | 20.78% | +1.58% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.60% | 21.40% | +1.20% |