PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AASMX vs. PRSVX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AASMX vs. PRSVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Thrivent Small Cap Stock Fund (AASMX) and T. Rowe Price Small-Cap Value Fund (PRSVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AASMX achieves a 12.90% return, which is significantly lower than PRSVX's 17.21% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with AASMX having a 10.99% annualized return and PRSVX not far behind at 10.63%.


AASMX

1D
1.20%
1M
4.72%
YTD
12.90%
6M
11.68%
1Y
24.57%
3Y*
13.05%
5Y*
5.96%
10Y*
10.99%

PRSVX

1D
1.18%
1M
3.66%
YTD
17.21%
6M
16.14%
1Y
32.70%
3Y*
16.27%
5Y*
6.45%
10Y*
10.63%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AASMX vs. PRSVX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AASMX
Thrivent Small Cap Stock Fund
12.90%2.13%13.02%12.20%-11.24%23.82%22.48%27.55%-10.77%11.70%
PRSVX
T. Rowe Price Small-Cap Value Fund
17.21%8.31%10.84%12.34%-18.53%25.47%12.49%25.82%-11.58%12.84%

Correlation

The correlation between AASMX and PRSVX is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.90

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 1996

0.93

The correlation between AASMX and PRSVX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AASMX vs. PRSVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AASMX
AASMX Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
AASMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AASMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
AASMX Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
AASMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
AASMX Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank

PRSVX
PRSVX Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
PRSVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PRSVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
PRSVX Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
PRSVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
PRSVX Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AASMX vs. PRSVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Thrivent Small Cap Stock Fund (AASMX) and T. Rowe Price Small-Cap Value Fund (PRSVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AASMXPRSVXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.58

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.76

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.37

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.31

3.98

-1.67

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.73

14.83

-7.10

AASMX vs. PRSVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AASMX Sharpe Ratio is 1.55, which is comparable to the PRSVX Sharpe Ratio of 2.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AASMX and PRSVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AASMXPRSVXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.55

2.13

-0.58

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.27

0.33

-0.06

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.49

0.51

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.40

0.64

-0.24

Drawdowns

AASMX vs. PRSVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AASMX drawdown since its inception was -57.13%, roughly equal to the maximum PRSVX drawdown of -55.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AASMX and PRSVX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AASMXPRSVXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-57.13%

-55.37%

-1.76%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.55%

-8.93%

-2.62%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.56%

-24.60%

-1.96%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.43%

-28.17%

-1.26%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.66%

-40.97%

-0.69%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.81%

-7.49%

-3.32%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.44%

2.37%

+1.07%

Volatility

AASMX vs. PRSVX - Volatility Comparison

Thrivent Small Cap Stock Fund (AASMX) and T. Rowe Price Small-Cap Value Fund (PRSVX) have volatilities of 4.43% and 4.49%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AASMXPRSVXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.43%

4.49%

-0.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.32%

12.31%

+0.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.19%

16.70%

+0.49%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.38%

19.79%

+2.59%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.65%

21.03%

+1.62%

AASMX vs. PRSVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

AASMX has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is higher than PRSVX's 0.78% expense ratio.


Dividends

AASMX vs. PRSVX - Dividend Comparison

AASMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.78%, less than PRSVX's 10.09% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AASMX
Thrivent Small Cap Stock Fund
2.78%3.14%4.21%0.42%12.87%14.74%1.83%10.84%18.67%0.00%0.17%0.00%
PRSVX
T. Rowe Price Small-Cap Value Fund
10.09%11.83%9.77%3.27%5.28%6.98%2.03%4.59%9.46%3.79%3.77%22.55%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.90, AASMX and PRSVX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

PRSVX has higher volatility (4.49%) compared to AASMX (4.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AASMX dropped -57.13% vs PRSVX's -55.37%.

PRSVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.13 vs 1.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AASMX and PRSVX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer