AASMX vs. DFISX
Compare and contrast key facts about Thrivent Small Cap Stock Fund (AASMX) and DFA International Small Company Portfolio (DFISX).
AASMX is managed by Thrivent. It was launched on Jul 1, 1996. DFISX is managed by Dimensional. It was launched on Sep 30, 1996.
Performance
AASMX vs. DFISX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
AASMX vs. DFISX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AASMX Thrivent Small Cap Stock Fund | -3.28% | 2.13% | 13.02% | 12.20% | -11.24% | 23.82% | 22.48% | 27.55% | -10.77% | 11.70% |
DFISX DFA International Small Company Portfolio | -1.97% | 36.35% | 3.76% | 14.46% | -17.13% | 10.71% | 9.27% | 24.18% | -19.42% | 24.78% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AASMX achieves a -3.28% return, which is significantly lower than DFISX's -1.97% return. Over the past 10 years, AASMX has outperformed DFISX with an annualized return of 9.89%, while DFISX has yielded a comparatively lower 7.66% annualized return.
AASMX
- 1D
- -1.15%
- 1M
- -9.52%
- YTD
- -3.28%
- 6M
- -1.97%
- 1Y
- 9.87%
- 3Y*
- 6.06%
- 5Y*
- 3.84%
- 10Y*
- 9.89%
DFISX
- 1D
- -0.34%
- 1M
- -11.77%
- YTD
- -1.97%
- 6M
- 2.11%
- 1Y
- 26.89%
- 3Y*
- 14.28%
- 5Y*
- 6.58%
- 10Y*
- 7.66%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
AASMX vs. DFISX - Expense Ratio Comparison
AASMX has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is higher than DFISX's 0.39% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
AASMX vs. DFISX — Risk / Return Rank
AASMX
DFISX
AASMX vs. DFISX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Thrivent Small Cap Stock Fund (AASMX) and DFA International Small Company Portfolio (DFISX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AASMX | DFISX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.45 | 1.66 | -1.21 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.80 | 2.15 | -1.36 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.10 | 1.33 | -0.22 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.54 | 2.04 | -1.50 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.97 | 7.97 | -6.01 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AASMX | DFISX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.45 | 1.66 | -1.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.17 | 0.42 | -0.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.44 | 0.48 | -0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.37 | 0.44 | -0.07 |
Correlation
The correlation between AASMX and DFISX is 0.56, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
AASMX vs. DFISX - Dividend Comparison
AASMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.24%, which matches DFISX's 3.21% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AASMX Thrivent Small Cap Stock Fund | 3.24% | 3.14% | 4.21% | 0.42% | 12.87% | 14.74% | 1.83% | 10.84% | 18.67% | 0.00% | 0.17% | 0.00% |
DFISX DFA International Small Company Portfolio | 3.21% | 3.19% | 3.39% | 3.01% | 3.51% | 3.06% | 1.71% | 4.54% | 7.74% | 1.27% | 4.44% | 4.47% |
Drawdowns
AASMX vs. DFISX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AASMX drawdown since its inception was -57.13%, smaller than the maximum DFISX drawdown of -60.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AASMX and DFISX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| AASMX | DFISX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -57.13% | -60.66% | +3.53% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.37% | -11.96% | -2.41% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.43% | -35.06% | +5.63% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.66% | -43.00% | +1.34% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.35% | -11.77% | +0.42% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.86% | -11.69% | +0.83% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.98% | 3.06% | +0.92% |
Volatility
AASMX vs. DFISX - Volatility Comparison
Thrivent Small Cap Stock Fund (AASMX) has a higher volatility of 6.30% compared to DFA International Small Company Portfolio (DFISX) at 5.90%. This indicates that AASMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DFISX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| AASMX | DFISX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.30% | 5.90% | +0.40% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.49% | 10.04% | +2.45% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.20% | 15.38% | +6.82% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.36% | 15.75% | +6.61% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.60% | 16.11% | +6.49% |