AASMX vs. AAUTX
AASMX (Thrivent Small Cap Stock Fund) and AAUTX (Thrivent Large Cap Value Fund) are both mutual funds - AASMX is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund managed by Thrivent, while AAUTX is a Large Cap Value Equities fund managed by Thrivent. Over the past 10 years, AASMX returned 11.83%/yr vs 13.14%/yr for AAUTX. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. AASMX charges 1.07%/yr vs 0.86%/yr for AAUTX.
Performance
AASMX vs. AAUTX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AASMX achieves a 17.26% return, which is significantly higher than AAUTX's 12.43% return. Over the past 10 years, AASMX has underperformed AAUTX with an annualized return of 11.83%, while AAUTX has yielded a comparatively higher 13.14% annualized return.
AASMX
- 1D
- 0.15%
- 1M
- 6.55%
- YTD
- 17.26%
- 6M
- 14.76%
- 1Y
- 27.96%
- 3Y*
- 14.64%
- 5Y*
- 6.89%
- 10Y*
- 11.83%
AAUTX
- 1D
- -0.14%
- 1M
- 0.64%
- YTD
- 12.43%
- 6M
- 12.00%
- 1Y
- 27.88%
- 3Y*
- 21.48%
- 5Y*
- 13.86%
- 10Y*
- 13.14%
AASMX vs. AAUTX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AASMX Thrivent Small Cap Stock Fund | 17.26% | 2.13% | 13.02% | 12.20% | -11.24% | 23.82% | 22.48% | 27.55% | -10.77% | 11.70% |
AAUTX Thrivent Large Cap Value Fund | 12.43% | 19.31% | 21.28% | 12.63% | -4.89% | 31.65% | 4.31% | 23.66% | -8.82% | 12.59% |
Correlation
The correlation between AASMX and AAUTX is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 28, 1996 | 0.85 |
The correlation between AASMX and AAUTX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AASMX vs. AAUTX — Risk / Return Rank
AASMX
AAUTX
AASMX vs. AAUTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Thrivent Small Cap Stock Fund (AASMX) and Thrivent Large Cap Value Fund (AAUTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| AASMX | AAUTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.87 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.05 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.47 | -0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.59 | 4.44 | -1.85 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.70 | 16.96 | -8.26 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
AASMX vs. AAUTX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AASMX drawdown since its inception was -57.13%, which is greater than AAUTX's maximum drawdown of -54.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AASMX and AAUTX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AASMX | AAUTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -57.13% | -54.34% | -2.79% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.55% | -6.48% | -5.07% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.56% | -14.85% | -11.71% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.43% | -18.71% | -10.72% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.66% | -38.88% | -2.78% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -1.14% | +1.14% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.79% | -7.98% | -2.81% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.44% | 1.69% | +1.75% |
Volatility
AASMX vs. AAUTX - Volatility Comparison
Thrivent Small Cap Stock Fund (AASMX) has a higher volatility of 4.94% compared to Thrivent Large Cap Value Fund (AAUTX) at 3.54%. This indicates that AASMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AAUTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AASMX | AAUTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.94% | 3.54% | +1.40% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.63% | 8.34% | +4.29% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.43% | 11.12% | +6.31% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.36% | 15.85% | +6.51% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.67% | 17.80% | +4.87% |
AASMX vs. AAUTX - Expense Ratio Comparison
AASMX has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is higher than AAUTX's 0.86% expense ratio.
Dividends
AASMX vs. AAUTX - Dividend Comparison
AASMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.68%, less than AAUTX's 4.70% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AASMX Thrivent Small Cap Stock Fund | 2.68% | 3.14% | 4.21% | 0.42% | 12.87% | 14.74% | 1.83% | 10.84% | 18.67% | 0.00% | 0.17% |
AAUTX Thrivent Large Cap Value Fund | 4.70% | 5.28% | 16.25% | 3.22% | 6.12% | 7.62% | 6.33% | 1.52% | 7.44% | 1.08% | 1.18% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AASMX and AAUTX have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AASMX has higher volatility (4.94%) compared to AAUTX (3.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AASMX dropped -57.13% vs AAUTX's -54.34%.
AAUTX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.59 vs 1.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AASMX and AAUTX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer