AASG.L vs. JRCE.L

Last updated Jul 18, 2026

AASG.L (Amundi MSCI Emerging Markets Asia UCITS ETF USD) and JRCE.L (JPMorgan China A Research Enhanced Index Equity (ESG) UCITS ETF USD (acc)) are both exchange-traded funds - AASG.L is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the MSCI AC Asia Ex Japan NR USD, while JRCE.L is a China Equities fund tracking the MSCI China A Onshore NR CNY. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, AASG.L returned 19.46%/yr vs 9.61%/yr for JRCE.L. A 0.56 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. AASG.L charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for JRCE.L.

Performance

AASG.L vs. JRCE.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Amundi MSCI Emerging Markets Asia UCITS ETF USD (AASG.L) and JPMorgan China A Research Enhanced Index Equity (ESG) UCITS ETF USD (acc) (JRCE.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AASG.L achieves a 18.19% return, which is significantly lower than JRCE.L's 10,596.03% return.

AASG.L

• 1D: -1.95%
• 1M: -11.19%
• 6M: 11.74%
• YTD: 18.19%
• 1Y: 32.83%
• 3Y*: 19.46%
• 5Y*: 7.06%
• 10Y*: 68.82%

JRCE.L

• 1D: -2.18%
• 1M: -5.23%
• 6M: 3.47%
• YTD: 10,596.03%
• 1Y: 29.13%
• 3Y*: 9.61%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AASG.L vs. JRCE.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
AASG.L Amundi MSCI Emerging Markets Asia UCITS ETF USD	18.19%	23.83%	14.04%	0.69%	-8.80%
JRCE.L JPMorgan China A Research Enhanced Index Equity (ESG) UCITS ETF USD (acc)	10,596.03%	-98.80%	11.38%	-17.74%	-9.39%

Correlation

The correlation between AASG.L and JRCE.L is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.53
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.51
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 21, 2022	0.56

The correlation between AASG.L and JRCE.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.51 to 0.56 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

AASG.L vs. JRCE.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AASG.L

AASG.L Risk / Return Rank: 57
AASG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 57
AASG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 53
AASG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 60
AASG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 58
AASG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 58

JRCE.L

JRCE.L Risk / Return Rank: 48
JRCE.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 10
JRCE.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 100
JRCE.L Omega Ratio Rank: 100
JRCE.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 14
JRCE.L Martin Ratio Rank: 14

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AASG.L vs. JRCE.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi MSCI Emerging Markets Asia UCITS ETF USD (AASG.L) and JPMorgan China A Research Enhanced Index Equity (ESG) UCITS ETF USD (acc) (JRCE.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	AASG.L	JRCE.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.50	0.00	+1.50
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.03	263.36	-261.34
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.28	88.90	-87.62
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.27	0.31	+1.96
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.61	0.70	+6.91

AASG.L vs. JRCE.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AASG.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.50, which is higher than the JRCE.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AASG.L and JRCE.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

AASG.L vs. JRCE.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AASG.L drawdown since its inception was -34.12%, smaller than the maximum JRCE.L drawdown of -99.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AASG.L and JRCE.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	AASG.L	JRCE.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-34.12%	-99.20%	+65.08%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.41%	-99.05%	+84.64%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-24.46%	-99.15%	+74.69%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-26.06%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-34.12%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-14.41%	-8.82%	-5.59%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-11.41%	-21.04%	+9.63%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.31%	43.28%	-38.97%

Volatility

AASG.L vs. JRCE.L - Volatility Comparison

Amundi MSCI Emerging Markets Asia UCITS ETF USD (AASG.L) has a higher volatility of 10.05% compared to JPMorgan China A Research Enhanced Index Equity (ESG) UCITS ETF USD (acc) (JRCE.L) at 9.07%. This indicates that AASG.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JRCE.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AASG.L	JRCE.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.05%	9.07%	+0.98%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	19.54%	654.26%	-634.72%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	21.82%	25,991.73%	-25,969.91%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.93%	12,491.08%	-12,468.15%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	2,144.70%	12,491.08%	-10,346.38%

AASG.L vs. JRCE.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

AASG.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than JRCE.L's 0.40% expense ratio.

Dividends

AASG.L vs. JRCE.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither AASG.L nor JRCE.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AASG.L and JRCE.L in my portfolio?

AASG.L and JRCE.L have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, AASG.L or JRCE.L?

On fees, AASG.L is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, AASG.L or JRCE.L?

AASG.L is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for JRCE.L.

What is the main difference between AASG.L and JRCE.L?

AASG.L is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while JRCE.L is China Equities. AASG.L tracks MSCI AC Asia Ex Japan NR USD, while JRCE.L tracks MSCI China A Onshore NR CNY. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for AASG.L and 0.40% for JRCE.L.